Skip to main content
Log in

Auditory assessment of avian predator threat in semi-captive ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta)

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Antiraptor responses from forest-living ringtailed lemurs to advertisement calls of naturally-occurring red-tailed hawks suggested that the lemurs discriminated these calls from other environmental sounds. A series of playback experiments, using real animal sounds and synthetic sound probes, was conducted to investigate the acoustic basis of this putative discrimination. Two semi-captive groups of ringtails served as study subjects: one group had many years of experience living in the forest, whereas the other group had relatively little such experience. Responses to playbacks suggested that both groups used the same acoustic criteria to discriminate “calls of large hawks” from other sounds, but the range of auditory stimuli that evoked antiraptor responses was broader for the experienced group than for the inexperienced group. Although several interpretations of the experimental results are possible, one that seems particularly compatible with the data is the “prototype” concept of stimulus categorization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beeman, K., 1989.“SIGNAL” User's Guide. Engineering Design, Belmont, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartecki, U. &E. W. Heymann, 1987. Field observations of snake-mobbing in a group of saddleback tamarins,Saguinus fuscicollis nigrifrons.Folia Primatol., 48: 199–202.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. H. &D. Amadon, 1968.Eagles, Hawks, and Falcons of the World. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B. &S. R. Schulman, 1980. Alarm responses to raptors by rhesus monkeys at Cayo Santiago.J. Mammal., 61: 739–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. A., 1986.Boa constrictor predation and group response in white-faced cebus monkeys.Biotropica, 18: 171–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, D. L. &R. W. Wrangham, 1987. Predation. In:Primate Societies,B. B. Smuts,D. L. Cheney,R. M. Seyfarth,R. W. Wrangham, &T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gautier-Hion, A. &C. E. G. Tutin, 1987. Simultaneous attack by adult males of a polyspecific troop of monkeys against a crowned hawk eagle.Folia Primatol., 51: 149–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouzoules, H., L. M. Fedigan, &L. Fedigan, 1975. Responses of a transplanted troop of Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata) to bobcat (Lynx rufus) predation.Primates, 16: 335–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, E. W., 1987. A field observation of predation on a moustached tamarin (Saguinus mystax) by an anaconda.Int. J. Primatol., 8: 193–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, A., 1966.Lemur Behavior. Univ. of Chicago Press. Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedonia, J. M., 1990. What is being communicated in the antipredator calls of lemurs? Evidence from playback experiments with ringtailed and ruffed lemurs.Ethol., 86: 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &J. F. Polak, 1989. Visual assessment of avian threat in semi-captive ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta).Behaviour, 111: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis, L., P. W. D. Dodd, &J. C. Fentress, 1985. The pooling fallacy: Problems arising when individuals contribute more than one observation to the data set.Z. Tierpsychol., 68: 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, M. E. & J. M. Macedonia, in press. Response urgency does not determine antipredator call selection in ringtailed lemurs.Anim. Behav.

  • Rosch, E. 1977. Classification of real-world objects: origins and representations in cognition. In:Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science,P. N. Johnson-Laird &P. C. Wason (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 212–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauther, M., 1989. Antipredator behavior in troops of free-rangingLemur catta at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar.Int. J. Primatol., 10: 595–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaik, C. P. van &M. A. van Noordwijk, 1989. The special role of male Cebus monkeys in predator avoidance and its effect on group composition.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 24: 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seyfarth, R. M. &D. L. Cheney, 1980. The ontogeny of vervet monkey alarm calling: A preliminary report.Z. Tierpsychol., 54: 37–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &D. L. Cheney, 1986. Vocal development in vervet monkeys.Anim. Behav., 34: 1640–1658.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, ————, &P. Marler, 1980. Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate.Anim. Behav., 28: 1070–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. O., 1968. Provoked release of mobbing — a hunting technique ofMicrastur falcons.Ibis., 111: 241–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. &F. J. Rolf, 1969.Biometry. W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, I., 1982.The Primates of Madagascar. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen, N., 1939. Why do birds behave as they do?Bird Lore, 41: 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. M., P. D. Stewart, G.-S. Ramangason, A. M. Denning, &M. S. Hutchings, 1989. Ecology and conservation of the crowned lemur,Lemur coronatus, at Ankarana, N. Madagascar.Folia Primatol., 52: 1–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Macedonia, J.M., Yount, P.L. Auditory assessment of avian predator threat in semi-captive ringtailed lemurs (Lemur catta). Primates 32, 169–182 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381174

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381174

Key Words

Navigation