, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 465–475 | Cite as

An ecological comparison of two sympatric primates:Saguinus fuscicollis andCallicebus moloch of Amazonian Peru

  • Janis Crandlemire-Sacco


The ecologies of two sympatric primates,Saguinus fuscicollis andCallicebus moloch, were compared during a four-month field study in southeastern Peru in order to examine the mechanisms by which these primate frugivores minimize competition for food and space.Saguinus fuscicollis andCallicebus moloch were found to differ dramatically both in diet and in use of the shared habitat. Specifically, tamarins and titis showed very little overlap in their choices of food plants or animal foods and they used distinctive foraging styles, exploiting very different parts of the habitat for animal prey. Significant interspecific differences were found in the use of particular support structures and strata within the forest, and in the density of vegetation preferred. These results suggest that resource competition between saddle-backed tamarins and dusky titis is minimal, a fact that could account for the high frequency of free association between the two species and the benign nature of these interspecific contacts.

Key Words

Ecology Diet Sympatry Competition Polyspecific groups 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altmann, J., 1977. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods.Behaviour, 49: 227–265.Google Scholar
  2. Crandlemire-Sacco, J. L., 1986. The ecology of the saddle-backed tamarin,Saguinus fuscicollis, of Southeastern Peru. Unpub. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  3. Dixon, W. J. (ed.), 1983.BMDP Statistical Software. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  4. Easley, S. P., 1982. Ecology and behavior ofCallicebus torquatus, Cebidae, Primates. Unpub. Ph.D. dissertation, Washington Univ., St. Louis.Google Scholar
  5. ————, 1984. Diet and territory inCallicebus torquatus.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 63: 154–155.Google Scholar
  6. ———— &P. A. Garber, 1982. Activity patterns in two species of Neotropical primates.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 57: 184.Google Scholar
  7. Gartlan, J. S. &T. T. Struhsaker, 1972. Polyspecific associations and niche separation in rainforest anthropoids in Cameroon, West Africa.J. Zool., London, 168: 221–226.Google Scholar
  8. Gautier-Hion, A., R. Quris, &J.-P. Gautier, 1983. Monospecific vs. polyspecific life: A comparative study of foraging and antipredatory tactics in a community ofCercopithecus monkeys.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 12: 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kinzey, W. G., 1977. Diet and feeding behavior ofCallicebus torquatus. In:Primate Ecology,T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 127–151.Google Scholar
  10. ————, 1978. Feeding behavior and molar features in two species of titi monkeys. In:Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 1,D. J. Chivers &J. Herbert (eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 373–385.Google Scholar
  11. ————, 1981. The titi monkeys, genusCallicebus. In:Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 1,A. F. Coimbra-Filho &R. A. Mittermeier (eds.), Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 214–276.Google Scholar
  12. ———— &M. Becker, 1983. Activity pattern of the masked titi monkey,Callicebus personatus.Primates, 24: 337–343.Google Scholar
  13. ———— &A. H. Gentry, 1979. Habitat utilization in two species ofCallicebus. In:Primate Ecology: Problem Oriented Field Studies,R. W. Sussman (ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 89–100.Google Scholar
  14. ————,A. L. Rosenberger, D. S. Heisler, D. L. Prowse, &J. S. Frilling, 1977. A preliminary field investigation of the yellow handed titi monkey,Callicebus torquatus torquatus in Northern Peru.Primates, 18: 159–181.Google Scholar
  15. Klein, L. L. &D. Klein, 1973. Observations of two types of Neotropical primate intertaxa associations.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 38: 649–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Koopmans, L. H., 1981.An Introduction to Contemporary Statistics. Duxbury Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  17. Moynihan, M., 1976.The New World Primates. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  18. Norconk, M. A., 1985. Characteristics of mixed-species troops ofSaguinus mystax andSaguinus fuscicollis: Group dynamics.Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 66(2): 210.Google Scholar
  19. Pearson, D. L. &J. L. Anderson, 1985. Perching heights and nocturnal roots of some tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) in Southeastern Peru.Biotropica, 17(2): 126–129.Google Scholar
  20. Pook, A. G. &G. Pook, 1982. Polyspecific associations betweenSaguinus fuscicollis, Saguinus labiatus, Callimico goeldii, and other primates in Northwestern Bolivia.Folia Primatol., 38: 196–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Struhsaker, T. T., 1981. Polyspecific associations among tropical rain-forest primates.Z. Tierpsycol., 57: 268–304.Google Scholar
  22. Terborgh, J., 1983.Five New World Primates. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  23. Thorington, R. W., 1967. Feeding activity ofCebus andSaimiri in a Colombian forest. In:Neue Ergbrisse der Primatologie,D. Starck,R. Schneider, &H. J. Kuhn (eds.), Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 136–179.Google Scholar
  24. Waser, P. M., 1980. Polyspecific associations ofCercocebus albigena: Geographical variation and ecological correlates.Folia Primatol., 33: 57–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. ————, 1987. Interactions among primate species. In:Primate Societies,B. B. Smuts,D. L. Cheney,R. M. Seyfarth,R. W. Wrangham, &T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 210–226.Google Scholar
  26. ———— &T. J. Case, 1981. Monkeys and matrices: Coexistence of “Omnivorous” forest primates.Oecologia, 49: 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yoneda, M., 1981. Ecological studies ofSaguinus fuscicollis andSaguinus labiatus with reference to habitat segregation and height preference.Kyoto Univ. Overseas Res. Rep. of New World Monkeys, 2: 43–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janis Crandlemire-Sacco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations