Skip to main content
Log in

Varying responses to feeding competition in a group of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta)

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The behaviour of members of a group of rhesus monkeys was observed in experimentally created, competitive feeding situations. Socially dominant members of the group tended to start eating before lower-ranking subjects, and generally ate more. Dominants sometimes used aggression to control access to food, but overall, intermediate-ranking monkeys were involved in most agonistic episodes. Non-dominant subjects improved their feeding performance when food was presented in three piles rather than one pile, often by snatching food and consuming it away from the pile. These general patterns were less evident when realistic snake models were placed on some of the food piles. Feeding was disrupted by the presence of snakes, but notably, subordinates risked feeding in these conditions. Piles containing preferred foods and snakes were eaten from, but a low-preference food (carrot) under snakes went untouched by all subjects. The results suggest that group-members evaluate potential risks and benefits of competing for a restricted resource, and that dominance status, while an important factor, is only one element in the equation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baulu, J. &D. E. Redmond, Jr., 1980. Social and nonsocial behaviours of sex- and age-matched enclosed and free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Folia Primatol., 34: 239–258.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belzung, C. &J. R. Anderson, 1986. Social rank and responses to feeding competition in rhesus monkeys.Behav. Proc., 12: 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. S., 1981. Dominance: The baby and the bathwater.Behav. Brain Sci., 4: 419–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chamove, A. S., 1983. Role or dominance in macaque response to novel objects.Motiv. Emotion, 7: 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • ,J. R. Anderson, S. C. Morgan-Jones, &S. P. Jones, 1982. Deep woodchip litter: Hygiene, feeding, and behavioral enhancement in eight primate species.Int. J. Stud. Anim. Prob., 3: 308–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. &P. H. Harvey, 1976. Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In:Growing Points in Ethology,P. P. G. Bateson &R. A. Hinde (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 195–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deag, J. M., 1977. Aggression and submission in monkey societies.Anim. Behav., 25: 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. M., 1984. Coping with social tension: Sex differences in the effect of food provision to small rhesus monkey groups.Anim. Behav., 32: 765–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • , 1986. Class structure in a rhesus monkey group: The interplay between dominance and tolerance.Anim. Behav., 34: 1033–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diezinger, F. &J. R. Anderson, 1986. Starting from scratch: A first look at a “displacement activity” in group-living rhesus monkeys.Amer. J. Primatol., 11: 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehardt, C. L. &I. S. Bernstein, 1986. Matrilineal overthrows in rhesus monkey groups.Int. J. Primatol., 7: 157–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fa, J. E. & C. H. Southwick (eds.), in press.The Ecology and Behavior of Food-enhanced Primate Groups. Alan R. Liss, New York.

  • Hinde, R. A. &S. B. Datta, 1981. Dominance—an intervening variable.Behav. Brain Sci., 4: 442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. B., 1981. The evolution and socioecology of dominance in primate groups: A theoretical formulation, classification and assessment.Primates, 22: 70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindburg, D. G., 1971. The rhesus monkey in north India: An ecological and behavioral study. In:Primate Behavior: Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Vol. 2,L. A. Rosenblum (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loy, J., 1975. The descent of dominance inMacaca: Insights into the structure of human societies. In:Socioecology and Psychology of Primates,R. H. Tuttle (ed.), Mouton, the Hague, pp. 153–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S., 1967. Pattern and process in competition.Adv. Ecol. Res., 4: 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mineka, S., M. Davidson, M. Cook, &R. Keir, 1984. Observational conditioning of snake fear in rhesus monkeys.J. Abnorm. Psychol., 93: 355–372.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ,R. Keir, &V. Price, 1980. Fear of snakes in wild and laboratory-reared monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Anim. Learn. Behav., 8: 653–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, S. M., 1974. The concept of dominance and methods of assessment.Anim. Behav., 22: 914–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, T. E., 1974. The concept of social dominance.Behav. Biol., 11: 131–154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sade, D. S., 1967. Determinants of dominance in a group of free-ranging rhesus monkeys. In:Social Communication Among Primates,S. Altmann (ed.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R., S. N. Sinha, &V. P. Dixit, 1984. Validation of dominance measures in free-ranging rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): A multivariate analysis. In:Current Primate Researches,M. L. Roonwal,S. M. Mohnot, &N. S. Rathore (eds.), Univ. of Jodhpur, Jodhpur, pp. 263–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, C. H., 1967. An experimental study of intragroup agonistic behaviour in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Behaviour, 28: 182–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Brennan, J., Anderson, J.R. Varying responses to feeding competition in a group of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Primates 29, 353–360 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380958

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380958

Key Words

Navigation