, Volume 31, Issue 1–2, pp 185–203 | Cite as

Evidentialism, warrant, and the division of epistemic labor

  • Colin P. Ruloff


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bergmann, Michael. 2000. “Deontology and Defeat.”Philosophy and Phenomenological Research LX, No. 1: 90.Google Scholar
  2. Jaeger, Christoph. 2000. “Warrant, Defeaters, and the Epistemic Basis of Theistic Belief.” Scholar
  3. Kvanvig, Jonathan. Ed. 1996.Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. Plantinga, Alvin. 1993.Warrant and Proper Function. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Plantinga, Alvin. 2000.Warranted Christian Belief. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Putnam, Hilary. 1975. “The Meaning of Meaning” inMind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ruloff, Colin. 2002. “Some Remarks on BonJour on Warrant, Proper Function, and Defeasibility.”Principia: An International Journal of Epistemiology Vol. 4, No. 2: 215–228.Google Scholar
  8. Sennett, James F. 1993. “Reformed Epistemology and Epistemic Dutty”Faith in Theory and Practice. Elizabeth S. Radcliffe and Carol White, Eds. Chicago and LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court.Google Scholar
  9. Sudduth, Michael. 1999. “The Internalist Character and Evidentialist Implications of Plantingian Defeaters.”International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 45, No. 3: 167–187.Google Scholar
  10. Wykstra, Stephen. 1989. “Toward a Sensible Evidentialism: On the Notion of Needing Evidence”Philosophy of Religion: Selected Readings (2nd Edition). William Rowe and WilliamGoogle Scholar
  11. Wainwright, Eds. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philosophia 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin P. Ruloff
    • 1
  1. 1.The Claremont Graduate UniversityClaremomtUSA

Personalised recommendations