Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the load-carrying capacity of anchors in rock

  • Papers
  • Published:
Hydrotechnical Construction Aims and scope

Conclusions

  1. 1.

    The proposed method of analysis of the load-carrying capacity of an anchor on the basis of the strength of the plug-rock interface makes it possible to take into account more adequately the actual stress conditions at this interface in comparison with the schemes based on an arbitrary uniform stress distribution.

  2. 2.

    Failure of the rock within the limits of the so-called inverted cone is a highly complex process, which necessitates special examination and analysis on the basis of solutions using numerical methods. In addition, because of the higher probability of loss of load-carrying capacity through failure of the plug-rock interface than of failure of the rock itself, the approximate analysis using the inverted cone scheme may be retained by applying the results of the tests on uplift resistance of slabs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. A. N. Marchuk, “Sections in gravity dam with stressed anchors in its foundation,” Gidrotekh. Stroitel'., No. 6 (1964).

  2. A. P. Timofeev, “Anchorage of concrete elements,” Gidrotekh. Stroitel'., No. 1 (1962).

  3. R. Muki and E. Sternberg, “Elastostatic load-transfer to a half-space from a partially embedded axially loaded rod,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, Vol. 6 (1970).

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 3, pp. 14–19, March, 1975.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ukhov, S.B., Kornilov, A.M. & Kotov, P.B. Evaluation of the load-carrying capacity of anchors in rock. Hydrotechnical Construction 9, 226–234 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380719

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380719

Keywords

Navigation