Summary
The survival probability as estimated by an individual is,ceteris paribus supposed to depend on his relative income position in a set of reference incomes. The relative income position is thus defined in close connection to the preference formation theory of Kapteyn. It is shown that then this survival probability, called ‘utility,’ may be equated to the relative income position. A nice result of this approach is the possibility to formulate a utilitarian welfare function, which leads to the definition of income inequality measures. It is shown that the use of sets of reference incomes may lead to considerably smaller measured inequality.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cowell, F.A.,Measuring Inequality, Oxford, 1977.
Deaton, A. and J. Muellbauer,Economics and Consumer Behavior, Cambridge, 1980.
Duesenberry, J.S.,Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behavior, Cambridge, 1949.
Kapteyn, A., ‘A Theory of Preference Formation,’ MRG Working Paper 7933, Modelling Research Group, University of Southern California, 1979.
Kapteyn, A.,Nut en Economie, Inaugural Lecture, Tilburg University, 1982.
Sen, A.K.,On Economic Inequality, Oxford, 1973.
Yule, G.U. and M.G. Kendall,An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics, Londen, 1957.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hempenius, A.L. Relative income position, individual and social income satisfaction, and income inequality. De Economist 132, 468–478 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380344
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380344