Skip to main content
Log in

Female-male earnings differentials in the founder countries of the european economic community: An econometric investigation

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In this study an attempt was made to find out whether the female-male earnings differentials in the six founder countries of the EEC were caused by the differences in the work characteristics of the two groups or by a systematic bias against women. In cases where discrimination against women appeared to exist an estimate was made of its degree. It was found that in all countries considered, with the exception of the Netherlands, women had lower average earnings even after standardizing for their different work characteristics. In these countries a substantial part of the female-male earnings differential could not be explained by the differences in the work characteristics of women and could be attributed to other factors, among which sexual prejudice seemed the most likely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addison, J.T., ‘Gleichberechtingung — The German Experience,’ in: Barrie O. Pettman (ed.),Equal Pay for Women, Bradford, England, 1975, pp. 99–128.

  • Arrow, K.J., ‘Models of Job Discrimination,’ in A.H. Pascal (ed.),Racial Discrimination in Economic Life, Lexington, Mass, 1972, pp. 83–102.

  • Arrow, K.J., ‘Some Mathematical Models of Race Discrimination in the Labor Market,’ in: A.H. Pascal (ed.),Racial Discimination in Economic Life, Lexington, Mass., 1972, 187–204.

  • Arrow, K.J., ‘The Theory of Discrimination,” in: Orley Ashenfelter and A. Ress (eds.),Discrimination in Labor Markets, Princeton, N.J., 1973, pp. 3–33.

  • Aigner, D.J. and G.C. Gain, ‘Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Markets,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, XXX (1977), pp. 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, N.S. and R.D. Morgenstern, ‘Why Do Blacks and Women Have High Unemployment Rates?,’Journal of Human Resources, IX (1974), pp. 452–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary,The Economics of Discrimination, 2nd Ed. Chicago, 1971, pp. 13–100.

  • Blinder, A.S., ‘Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates,’Journal of Human Resources, VIII (1973), pp 436–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J., ‘Pay Differerences Between Men and Women in the Same Job,’Monthly Labor Review, XCIV (1971), pp. 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazzini, A.J., ‘Equality of Employment Opportunity in the Federal White-Collar Civil Service,’Journal of Human Resources, VII (1972), pp. 424–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferber, M.A. and H.M. Lowry, ‘The Sex Differential in Earnings: A Reappraisal,”Industrial and Labor Relations Review, XXIX (1976), pp. 377–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V.R., ‘Differences in Hourly Earnings Between Men and Women,’Monthly Labor Review, XCIV (1971), pp. 9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, Christine, ‘Male-Female Differentials in Great Britain: Is Marriage an Equal Opportunity?,’Economic Journal, XCIV (1980), pp. 751–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronau, Reuben, ‘Wage Comparisons — A Selectivity Bias,’Journal of Political Economy, LXXXII (1974), pp. 1119–1143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, M., ‘Male-Female Differentials and the Impact of Equal Pay Legislation,’Review of Economics and Statistics, LVII (1975), pp. 462–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, M., ‘The Influence of the Status and Sex Composition of Occupations on the Male-Female Earnings Gap,’Industrial and Labor Relations Review, XXXI (1978), pp. 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leijon, A.G., ‘Sexual Equality in the Labor Markets: Some Experiences and Views of the Nordic Countries,”International Labour Review, CXII (1975), pp. 109–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B.G. and J.A. Malkiel, ‘Male-Female Pay Differential in Professional Employment,’American Economic Review, LXIII (1973), pp. 693–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, D., ‘Differences in Pay Between Men and Women Workers,’Monthly Labor Review, XC (1967), pp. 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, Jacob and S. Polachek, ‘Family Investments in Human Capital: Earnings of Women,’Journal of Political Economy, LXXXII (1974), pp. S76-S108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaxaca, R., ‘Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets,’International Labour Review, XIV (1973), pp. 693–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, E., ‘The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism,’American Economic Review, LXII (1972), pp. 659–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanborn, H., ‘Pay Differences Between Men and Women,’Industrial and Labor Relations Review, XVII (1964), pp. 534–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandell, S.H., ‘Is the Unemployment Rakte of Women Too Low? A Direct Test of the Economic Theory of Job Search,’Review of Economics and Statistics, LXII (1980), pp. 634–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E., ‘Approches to the Economics of Discrimination,’American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, LXIII (1973), pp. 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E., ‘Theories of Discrimination and Economic Policy,’ in: G.M. Von Furstenberg, A. Horowitz and B. Harrison (eds.),Patterns of Racial Discrimination (Vol. II), Employment and Income, Lexington, Mass., 1974, pp. 5–26.

  • Sullerot, E., ‘Equality of Renumeration for Men and Women in the Member States of the EEC,’International Labour Review, CXII (1975), pp. 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suter, L.E. and H.P. Miller, ‘Income Differences between Men and Career Women,’American Journal of Sociology, LXXVIII (1973), pp. 962–974.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kottis, A.P. Female-male earnings differentials in the founder countries of the european economic community: An econometric investigation. De Economist 132, 204–223 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380299

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02380299

Keywords

Navigation