Philosophia

, Volume 26, Issue 1–2, pp 65–77 | Cite as

Could demonstratives be descriptions?

  • Steven Rieber
Series: Emotion
  • 45 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Donnellan, Keith (1966), “Reference and Definite Descriptions”,The Philosophical Review 77, pp. 281–304.Google Scholar
  2. Grice, H.P. (1969), “Vacuous Names,” in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (ed.)Words and Objections, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 118–145.Google Scholar
  3. Kaplan, David (1989), “Demonstratives,” in J. Almog et al. (ed.)Themes from Kaplan, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 481–563.Google Scholar
  4. Kripke, Saul (1977), “Speaker Reference and Semantic Reference,” in P. French et al. (ed.)Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 6–27.Google Scholar
  5. Lewis, David (1980), “Index, Context, and Content,” in S. Kanger and S. Ohman (ed.)Philosophy and Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  6. Neale, Stephen (1990),Descriptions, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Numberg, Geoffrey (1993), “Indexicality and Deixis,”Linguistics and Philosophy 16, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
  8. Perry, John (1979), “The Problem of the Essential Indexical,”Nous 13, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
  9. Recanati, Francois (1993),Direct Reference, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Reichenbach, Hans (1947),Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York: Macmillian.Google Scholar
  11. Russell, Bertrand (1940),An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philosophia 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven Rieber
    • 1
  1. 1.State UniversityGeorgiaAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations