, Volume 24, Issue 3–4, pp 321–330 | Cite as

Supervenience, reduction, and infinite disjunction

  • Nick Zangwill


Infinite Disjunction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blackburn 1971 “Moral Realism”, John Casey (ed.),Morality and Moral Reasoning, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  2. Blackburn 1985 “Supervenience Revisited”, IAN Hacking, (ed.)Exercises in Analysis: Essays in Honour of Casimir Lewy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Davidson 1980 “Mental Events”,Actions and Events, Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  4. Honderich 1982 “The Argument for Anomalous Monism”,Analysis.Google Scholar
  5. Kim 1978 “Supervenience and Nomological Incommensurables”,American Philosophical Quarterly.Google Scholar
  6. Kim 1984a “Concepts of Supervenience”,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.Google Scholar
  7. Kim 1984b. “Epiphenomenal and Supervenient Causation”,Midwest Studies in Philosophy, Vol.IX, Causation and Causal Theories, University of Minnesota Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  8. Kim 1990 “Supervenience as a Philosophical Concept”,Metaphilosophy.Google Scholar
  9. Moore 1903,Principia Ethica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Owens 1989 “Disjunctive Laws”,Analysis.Google Scholar
  11. Teller 1984 “Comments on Kim”,Southern Journal of Philosophy Supplement.Google Scholar
  12. Zangwill 1992a “Variable Realization: Not Proved”,Philosophical Quarterly.Google Scholar
  13. Zangwill 1992b “Long Live Supervenience”,Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.Google Scholar
  14. Zangwill 1993 “Supervenience and Anomalous Monism”,Philosophical Studies.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philosophia 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Zangwill
    • 1
  1. 1.University of GlasgowGlasgowU.K.

Personalised recommendations