Philosophia

, Volume 23, Issue 1–4, pp 3–23 | Cite as

Scientific discovery: A philosophical survey

  • Aharon Kantorovich
Philosophical Surveys

Keywords

Scientific Discovery Philosophical Survey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baggott, J. 1990. “Serendipity and Scientific Progress,”New Scientist No. 1706: 67–68.Google Scholar
  2. Blachowicz, J. 1987. “Discovery as Correction,”Synthese 71: 235–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —. 1989. “Discovery and Ampliative Inference”Philosophy of Science 56: 438–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchanan, B. 1982. “Mechanizing the Search for Explanatory Hypotheses”, InPSA, vol. 2, ed., P. Asquith, & I. Hacking, 129–146. East Lansing, Michigan: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
  5. Cushing, J.T. 1990.Theory Construction and Selection in Modern Physics: The S Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cziko, G. A. & Campbell, D. T. “Comprehensive bibliography: Evolutionary epistemology”,Journal of Social and Biological Structures, 13: 41–82.Google Scholar
  7. Donovan, A., Laudan, L., & Laudan, R. 1988.Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Giere, R. 1988. Explaining Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gooding, D., Pinch, T. & Schaffer, S. (1989).The Uses of Experiment: Studies in The Natural Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hahlweg, K. & Hooker, C. ed. 1989.Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hanson, N. R. 1958.Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hull, D. 1988.Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jacob, F. 1977. “Evolution and Tinkering”,Science, 196: 1161–1166.Google Scholar
  14. Kantorovich, A. 1993.Scientific Discovery: Logic and Tinkering. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kantorovich, A. & Ne'eman, Y. 1989. “Serendipity as a Source of Evolutionary Progress in Science”,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20: 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleiner, S. 1983. “A new look at Kepler and Abductive Argument,”Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 14: 279–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kohn, A. 1989.Fortune or Failure: Missed Opportunities and Chance Discoveries. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Lamb, D. & Easton, S. M. 1984.Multiple Discovery: The Pattern of Scientific Progress. Avebury Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  19. Langley P., Simon, H., Bradshaw, G. & Zytkow, J. 1987.Scientific Discovery: Computational Explorations of the Creative Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Levi-Strauss, C. 1962.La Pensée Sauvage. Plon: Paris.Google Scholar
  21. Lugg, A. 1985. “The process of Discovery”,Philosophy of Science, 52: 207–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Musgrave, A. 1988. “Is there a Logic of Scientific Discovery?”LSE Quarterly 2–3: 205–227.Google Scholar
  23. Nickles, T. (ed.) 1978.Scientific Discovery, Logic and Rationality. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  24. — (ed.) 1980.Scientific Discovery: Case Studies. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  25. Pickering, A. 1984.Constructing Quarks. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Polanyi, M. 1958.Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  27. Roberts, R. M. 1989.Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science. John Wiley. Science, (28 Feb.) 1992. “Products and Materials”.Google Scholar
  28. Shapiro, G. 1986.A Skeleton in the Darkroom — Stories of Serendipity in Science. San Francisco: Harper&Row.Google Scholar
  29. Simon, H. A. 1987. “Is a Scientific Discovery a Topic in the Philosophy of Science?” InScientific Inquiry in Philosophical Perspective, ed. N. Rescher, 1–15. University Press of America.Google Scholar
  30. Simonton, D. K. 1988.Scientific Genius: A Psychology of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Thagard, P. 1980. “Against Evolutionary Epistemology”.Proceedings of the Biannual Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, East Lansing, Michigan.Google Scholar
  32. — 1988.Computational Philosophy of Science. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Vaux, J. 1990. “Replicating the Expert”,New Scientist, No. 1706: 55–58.Google Scholar
  34. Winograd, T. A., & F. Flores. 1987.Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  35. Zahar, E. 1983. “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Invention?British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34: 243–61.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philosophia 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aharon Kantorovich
    • 1
  1. 1.Tel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations