This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Church, A.,Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Princeton, 1956.
Cohen, S.M., “Socrates on the Definition of Pietey: Euthyphro 10A–11B,” inThe Philsophy of Socrates, ed. by G. Vlastos, Garden City, 1971, pp. 158–76.
Føllesdal, D., “Quantification into Causal Contexts,” inReferences and Modality, ed. by L. Linsky, Oxford, 1971, pp. 52–62.
Geach, P.T., “Plato's Euthyphro: An Analysis and Commentary,”The Monist 50 (1966), pp. 369–82.
Gerhardt, C.I. (ed.),Philosophische Schriften von G.W. Leibniz, Vol. VII, Berlin, 1875–90.
Kripke, S., “A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic,”JSL, 24 (1959), pp. 1–15.
Kripke, S., “Semantical Considerations on Modal Logic” (1963), inReference and Modality, ed. by L. Linsky, Oxford, 1971, pp. 63–72.
Mates, B., “Leibniz on Possible Worlds”, inLeibniz: a collection of critical essays, ed. by H.G. Frankfurt, Garden City, 1972, pp. 335–64.
Plato,Euthyphro, inThe Trial and Death of Socrates, ed. and trans. by G.M. A. Grube, Indianapolis, 1975.
Quine, W.V.O., “Three Grades of Modal Involvement” (1953), inThe Ways of Paradox, New York, 1966, pp. 156–74.
Quine, W.V.O. “Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes” (1956), inReference and Modality, L. Linsky (ed.), Oxford, 1971, pp. 101–111.
Quine, W.V.O.,Word and Object, New York, 1960.
Sharvy, R. “Euthyphro 9d–11b: Analysis and Definition in Plato and Others,”Nous 6 (1972), pp. 119–37.
—— “Three Types of Referential Opacity,”Phil Sci 39 (1972), pp. 153–161.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I have used G.M.A. Grube's translation of theEuthyphro, which according to Grube, follows Burnet's Oxfort text. See Grube's,The Trial and Death of Socrates (Indianapolis, 1975).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Friedman, J.I. Plato'sEuthyphro and Leibniz' Law. Philosophia 12, 1–20 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379355
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379355