Conclusions
-
1.
For conditions similar to those prevailing at the Krasnoyarsk hydroelectric plant, the spacing 1.5×3 m of the cooling pipes is the most economical one.
-
2.
The spacing 3×1.5 m may ensure maintenance of the temperature regime during the hardening of the mix in the main concrete mass.
-
3.
The cost of the cooling water decreases as the spacing of the pipes is increased.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literature Cited
VSN-02-64, Tentative Instructions for the Securing of Monolithic Concrete Hydraulic Structures in Regions Having a Severe Continental Climate [in Russian], Énergiya (1964).
F. A. Shevelev, Table for the Hydraulic Analysis of Steel, Cast-Iron, and Asbestos-Cement Water Pipe [in Russian], Stroiizdat (1956).
A. P. Dolmatov and S. Z. Neidlin, Temperature Control of the Massive concrete of the Krasnoyarsk hydro-electric station dam, ”Gidrotekh. Stroitel”, No. 11 (1968).
Additional information
Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 1, pp. 43–44, January, 1971.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dolmatov, A.P. Determination of the most economical spacing of cooling coils for concrete massess. Hydrotechnical Construction 5, 68–69 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379341
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379341