Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Confirmation of empirical theories by observation sets

  • Five Essays on Racism
  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J.L. Bell and A.B. Slomson, Models and Ultraproducts: an introduction, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Grant, Incomplete models, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic XV(1974) pp. 601–607.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.H. Harris, Popper's definitions of ‘verisimilitude’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25(1974) pp. 160–166.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.G. Hempel, Studies in the logic of confirmation, in Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York, 1965 pp. 3–51.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Musgrave, Logical versus historical theories of confirmation, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25(1974) pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Przelecki, The Logic of Empirical Theories, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Florida, 32611, Gainesville, Florida, USA

    John Grant

Authors
  1. John Grant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grant, J. Confirmation of empirical theories by observation sets. Philosophia 8, 367–380 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379249

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02379249

Keywords

Search

Navigation