, Volume 14, Issue 1–2, pp 83–97 | Cite as

Cans, advantages, and possible worlds

  • Douglas N. Walton


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Lennart Åqvist, ‘A New Approach to the Logical Theory of Actions and Causality,’ in Sören Stenlund (ed.),Logical Theory and Semantics, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1974, 73–91.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bruce Aune, “Can' in theEncyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Paul Edwards, New York, MacMillan and the Free Press, 1967, Vol. 2, 18–20.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Alvin Goldman,A Theory of Human Action, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall, 1970.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Keith Lehrer, ‘Can in Theory and Practice: A Possible World Analysis,’ inAction Theory, ed. Myles Brand and Douglas Walton, Dordrecht, Reidel, 1976, 241–270.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Nicholas Rescher and Alasdair Urquhart,Temporal Logic, New York, Springer-Verlag, 1971.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Douglas Walton, “Logical Form and Agency,”Philosophical Studies, 29, 1976, 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Douglas Walton, “Relatedness in Intensional Action Chains,’Philosophical Studies, 36, 1979, 175–223.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Bar-Ilan University 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas N. Walton
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of winnipegWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations