Skip to main content
Log in

Differential phytotoxicity among species and cultivars of the genusBrassica to wheat

I. Laboratory and field screening of species

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Field, glasshouse and laboratory studies were conducted to examine the degree of phytotoxicity and any differential phytotoxicity among residues of the genus Brassica usingTriticum aestivum as the test species. Compared to water controls, aqueous extracts of thirteen Brassica residues from six species ranged in inhibition from 56.7% to 91.4% for coleoptile growth and 59.1% to 97.8% for root growth. Based on the aqueous extract screening, six cultivars representing four species were used in a field experiment which showed significant differences among cultivars and species. All residues reduced grain yield, plant dry weight, plant height and tiller production in wheat. Increasing levels of inhibition occurred fromB. campestris cv. Torch,B. juncea cv. Zem 1,B. napus cv. Wesroona,B. nigra cv. Vince,B. juncea cvs. Lethbridge 22A and Zem 2. There are significant positive correlations for the ranked cultivars among the parameters measured in each trial and among trials. Laboratory studies indicated that field residues, stored dry, became less toxic over time and that increasing humidity appeared to increase the rate of decay of activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bell D 1970 Allelopathic effect ofBrassica nigra on annual grasslands. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell D T, Muller C H 1973 Dominance of California annual grasslands byBrassica nigra. Am. Midland Nat. 90 (2), 277–299.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell A G 1959 A germination inhibitor and root growth retarder inB. oleracea var. Chou Moellier. Nature 183, 1263–1264.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fay P K and Duke W B 1977 An assessment of allelopathic potential inAvena germ plasm. Weed Sci. 25, 224–228.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Guenzi W D, McCalla T M, Norstadt F A 1967 Presence and persistence of phytotoxic substances in wheat, oat, corn and sorghum residues. Agron. J. 59, 163–165.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grummer G 1961 The role of toxic substances in the interrelationships between higher plants. Symp. Soc. Exp. Bio. 15, 219–228.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harper S H T and Lynch J M 1982 The role of water-soluble components in phytotoxicity from decomposing straw. Plant and Soil 65, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horricks J 1969 Influence of rape residues on cereal production. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 49, 632–634.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jessop, R S and Stewart L S 1983 Effects of crop residues, soil type and temperature on emergence and early growth of wheat. Plant and Soil 74, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kimber R W L 1967 Phytotoxicity from plant residues. I. The influence of rotted wheat straw on seedling growth. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 18, 361–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leather, G R 1983 Sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) are allelopathic to weeds. Weed Sci. 31, 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lockerman R H and Putnam A R 1979 Evaluation of allelopathic cucumbers as an aid to weed control. Weed Sci. 27, 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lockerman R H and Putnam A R 1981 Mechanisms for differential interference among cucumber cultivar pioneer accessions. Bot. Gaz. 142, 427–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McCalla T M and Norstadt F A 1974 Toxicity problems in mulch tillage. J. Agric. Env. 1, 153–174.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Neal J L 1973 Effect of rape on accumulation of nitrate in soil. Weekly Letter No. 2057, Lethbridge Res. Stn., Alberta, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Parr J F, Papendick R I 1978 Factors affecting the decomposition of crop residues by micro-organisms. In Crop Residue Management Systems, ASA Special Publication No. 31, 1978, Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Putnam A R and Duke W B 1974 Biological suppression of weeds: evidence for allelopathy in accessions of cucumbers. Sci. 185, 370–372.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Patrick A A 1971 Phytotoxic substances associated with the decomposition in soil of plant residues. Scil Science 111, 13–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rice E L 1984 Allelopathy. 2nd Edn. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rose S J, Burnside O C, Specht J E and Swisher B A 1984 Competition and allelopathy between soybeans and weeds. Agron. J. 76, 523–528.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Steele R G D, Torrie J H 1980 Principles and procedures of statistics. 2nd Edn., McGraw-Hill, Kogakusha, Ltd., Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stowe L G 1979 Allelopathy and its influence on the distribution of plants in an Illionois old-field. J. Ecol. 67, 1067–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stringham G R 1971 Genetics of four hypocotyl mutans inB. campestris J. Hered. 62, 248–250.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vera C L 1981 Adverse effect ofBrassica species on subsequent crops. M.Sc. thesis, University of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Waddington J and Bowren K E 1978 Effect of crop residue on production of barley, bromegrass and alfalfa in the greenhouse and in the field. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 58, 249–255.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mason-Sedun, W., Jessop, R.S. & Lovett, J.V. Differential phytotoxicity among species and cultivars of the genusBrassica to wheat. Plant Soil 93, 3–16 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02377141

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02377141

Key words

Navigation