Conclusions
-
1.
Observations of seepage, structure deformation, and reconfiguration of the channel, testify to the fact that the XXII Congress KPSS Volga HES, constructed on sandy siltstone rock, is functioning normally.
-
2.
Omission of quick-lowering gates in front of the turbines, and of individual stop gates in the HES forebay, has not caused complications in operation.
-
3.
The rubber seals between the concrete slabs, installed instead of filters beneath the concrete protective covering on the earth dam slopes, are functioning well.
-
4.
Multi-unit HES should be equipped with reliable totalizing instruments for computing flow through the turbines.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
G. A. Russo (editor), Hydroelectric Stations of the Volga and Kama Sequences [in Russian], Gosénergoizdat (1960).
A. V. Mikhailov, “The Volga-Kama sequence of hydrocomplexes,” Gidrotekh. Stroitel', No. 6 (1967).
A. V. Mikhailov (editor), Technical Record and Design and Construction of the XXII Congress KPSS Volga HES [in Russian], Izd-vo “Énergiya” (1965).
A. V. Mikhailov and I. S. Kharitonov, “The Stalingrad hydroelectrical station,” Gidrotekh. Stroitel', No. 1 (1959).
A. V. Mikhailov, “Some design and construction decisions concerning the hydrotechnical structures of the Stalingrad hydrocomplex,” No. 8 (1961).
A. V. Mikhailov and V. M. Sinyavskaya, “Hydraulic regimen for operating spillway structures of the Stalingrad hydrocomplex,” No. 9 (1961).
A. V. Natanson, “Principal hydropower equipment of the XXII Congress KPSS Volga HES, No. 10 (1961).
A. O. Sudzilovskii, “Mechanical equipment of the Volgograd hydrocomplex structures,” No. 11 (1961).
A. Ya. Kuznetsov, “Construction of the Stalingrad hydroelectric station,” No. 3 (1961).
P. A. Kulakov and A. S. Abakumova, “Concrete hydraulic structures of the Volgograd hydrocomplex,” No. 12 (1961).
Yu. S. Abramov and I. I. Bityukov, “Prefabricated reinforced concrete in the principal structures of the Stalin-grad HES,” No. 8 (1961).
V. N. Razin, “Concrete production during construction of the Stalingrad HES building,” No. 10 (1960).
A. G. Yakobson, “Damming the Volga channel for construction of the Stalingrad hydroelectric station,” No. 2 (1959).
V. I. Bondarenko, “Vertical drainage for construction of the Stalingrad hydrocomplex,” No. 10 (1959).
F. I. Emel'yanov, “Construction of the spillway dam blanket for the Stalingrad hydrocomplex by dumping clay soils into water,” No. 3 (1959).
E. F. Drondin and A. M. Lar'kov, “Operation of filters during unwatering of the foundations for the Stalingrad hydrocomplex,” No. 2 (1960).
K. I. Rossinskii, “Deformations of the Volga channel in the Stalingrad hydrocomplex tailbay,” No. 10 (1961).
V. M. Sinyavskaya, P. D. Gavriski, and M. N. Rubanik, “Full-scale studies of hydraulic structures of the Stalingrad hydrocomplex,” No. 9 (1961).
B. A. Bal', “Ejection tests for the XXII Congress KPSS Volga HES,” No. 6 (1966).
M. P. Samokhvalova, “Reconfiguration of the Volga reservoir banks,” No. 11 (1966).
V. S. Serkov, “Full-scale tests of ejection at combined HES with pressure spillways,” No. 4 (1967).
V. I. Bondarenko and K. A. Bobkov, “Effectiveness of the subsurface seepage prevention contour of a hydroelectric station,” No. 11 (1966).
M. A. Rudyk, A. R. Freishist, A. A. Davydov, and N. N. Klingert (deceased), “Full-scale tests of the triple cross-bar surface gate for the XXII Congress KPSS Volga HES dam,” No. 2 (1968).
I. V. Goryunov and V. V. Perzhinskii, “Change of the ice-thermal regimen of the Lower Volga associated with construction of the XXII Congress KPSS Volga HES and the formation of the Volgograd reservoir,” No. 1 (1968).
V. G. Grebenkin and V. M. Kostomarov, “Collapse of the bank at Levchunovka village on the Volgograd reservoir,” No. 1 (1968).
A. N. Chemin and E. A. Elokhin, “Effect of the Stalingrad hydrocomplex on the national economy,” No. 8 (1961).
N. M. Chuprakov, “Role of the XXII Congress KPSS Volga HES in the Unified Power System of the European part of the USSR,” No. 10 (1961).
Additional information
This paper closes the account of experiences in operating the active HES constructed on the Volga River. Experiences in operating other Volga hydrocomplexes are given in “Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo” No. 6, 7, 9, and 10 (1967). Highlights of experiences in operating the Kama hydrocomplexes began with the paper of V. D. Yasinska, published in the present issue of this journal. — Editor.
Translated from Gidrotekhnicheskoe Stroitel'stvo, No. 4, pp. 1–10, April, 1968.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivanov, M.A. Experiences in Operating the Principal Structures of the XXII Congress KPSS Volga Hydroelectric Station. Hydrotechnical Construction 2, 278–289 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02376419
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02376419