Electrochemical promotion of the NO reduction by C2H4 on Pt/YSZ and by CO on Pd/YSZ
The effect of electrochemical promotion was investigated for the catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ethylene and carbon monoxide on polycrystalline Pt and Pd, respectively, deposited on yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ).
It was found in both cases that applying negative potentials and thus lowering the catalyst work function results in a pronounced increase in the catalytic rate and in the selectivity to nitrogen. A 7-fold increase was observed for the NO+C2H4 reaction on Pt while a 2-fold increase was obtained for the NO+CO reaction on Pd. The induced changes in catalytic rates were found to be 7 to 50 times higher than the rates of ion transfer from the catalyst surface. In both reactions, the observed electrophilic behavior can be attributed to the strengthening of the chemisorptive NO bond and concomitant enhanced dissociation of NO as the catalyst potential and work function is decreased.
Forced periodic oscillations of the applied current was investigated and resulted in a enhanced production of CO2, but an intermediate selectivity towards N2, as compared to constant current application. The effect of the cycling waveform, frequency and amplitude was studied and provided evidence that the synergy observed during the cycling experiment results from a favorable transient coverage of adsorbed species on the catalyst surface as the catalyst potential oscillates from negative to positive values.
KeywordsZirconia Carbon Monoxide Nitric Oxide C2H4 Work Function
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- C.G. Vayenas, M.M. Jaksic, S.I. Bebelis and S.G. Neophytides, “The Electrochemical Activation of Catalytic Reactions” in Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry (J.O.'M. Bockris, B.E. Conway and R.E, White, eds.), Vol29, 57–202, Plenum Press, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
- K.C. Taylor, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng.35(4), 457–481 (1993).Google Scholar
- M. Shelef and G.W. Graham, Catal. Rev.-Sci and Eng.36(3), 433–457 (1994).Google Scholar
- J.C. Summers and W.B. Williamson, ACS Symp. Ser.55, J.N. Armor, (ed.) (1994).Google Scholar
- J. Dettling, Z. Hu, Y.K. Lui, R. Smaling, C.Z. Wan and A. Punke, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, Vol.96, 461–472 (1995).Google Scholar
- V.G. Papadakis, C.A. Pliangos, I.V. Yentekakis, X.E. Verykios and C.G. Vayenas, Catalysis Today688, 0 (1996).Google Scholar
- A. Palermo, R.M. Lambert, I.R. Harkness, I.V. Yentekakis, O. Mar'ina and C.G. Vayenas, J. Catal., in press (1996).Google Scholar
- O.A. Mar'ina, I.V. Yentekakis, C.G. Vayenas, A. Palermo and M. Lambert, submitted to J. Catal. (1996).Google Scholar
- E. Varkaraki, PhD Thesis No 1455, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne.Google Scholar
- A. Kaloyannis and C.G. Vayenas, to be submitted.Google Scholar
- M. Marwood and C.G. Vayenas, submitted to J. Catal. (1996).Google Scholar
- A. Renken, International Chemical Engineering24, No 2, 202–213 (1984).Google Scholar
- P.L. Silveston, Can. J. Chem. Eng.69, 1106–1120 (1991).Google Scholar
- M.R. Prairie and J.E. Bailey, Chem. Eng. Sci.42, No. 9, 2085–2102 (1987).Google Scholar
- H. Muraki and Y. Fujitani, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev.25, 414–419 (1986).Google Scholar