, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 145–152 | Cite as

The relationship between host destruction and parasite reproductive potential inMuscidifurax raptor, M. zaraptor, andSpalangia endius [Chalcidoidea: Pteromalidae]

  • E. F. Legner


Highly significant correlations existed between parasite reproduction and host destruction statistics calculated for 3 hymenopterous parasites of muscoid flies,Muscidifurax raptorGirault & Sanders,M. zaraptorKogan & Legner, andSpalangia endiusWalker, ovipositing under varied environmentally controlled conditions. A consideration of an individual parasite's host destructive capacity is important in order to correctly evaluate the direct impact of periodic inundative releases in the field. In this study mortality resulting from host-feeding, probing and aborted parasitism averaged ca. 37, 28, and 31% forS. endius, M. raptor andM. zaraptor, respectively. The observation of such highly significant correlations with reproductive potential indicates a means for more accurate evaluation of field performance (hosts destroyed both reproductively and incidentally) in 3 useful species.


Plant Pathology Field Performance Direct Impact Accurate Evaluation Reproductive Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Il existe des corrélations très significatives entre la reproduction potentielle des parasites et la destruction de l'hôte calculées pour 3 hyménoptères parasites des mouches muscoïdes,Muscidifurax raptorGirault & Sanders,M. zaraptorKogan & Legner, etSpalangia endiusWalker, pondant dans différentes conditions contrôlées de milieu. Il est important de considérer la capacité du parasite individuel pour la destruction de l'hôte pour que l'on puisse évaluer correctement l'impact direct des lâchers inondatifs périodiques dans la nature. L'observation de telles corrélations très significatives avec la reproduction potentielle indique un moyen pour une évaluation plus précise des résultats obtenus (hôtes détruits directement ou dont la reproduction est altérée) par 3 espèces utiles.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, W. S. — 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. —J. Econ. Entomol., 18, 265–267.Google Scholar
  2. Birch, L. C. — 1948. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. —J. Anim. Ecol., 17, 15–26.Google Scholar
  3. Bouček, Z. — 1963. A taxonomic study inSpalangia Latr. [Hymenoptera. Chalcidoideu]. —Acta Entomol. Mus. Nat. Prague, 35, 429–512.Google Scholar
  4. DeBach, P. — 1943. The importance of host-feeding by adult parasites in the reduction of host populations. —J. Econ. Entomol., 36, 647–658.Google Scholar
  5. — 1954. Relative efficacy of the red scale parasiteAphytis chrysomphali Mercet andAphytis “A” on citrus trees in southern California. —Bull. Lab. Zool. Gen. e Agr. (Filippo Silvestri). Portici, 33, 135–151.Google Scholar
  6. Flanders, S. E. — 1951. Mass culture of California red scale and its golden chalcid parasites. —Hilgardia, 21, 1–42.Google Scholar
  7. — 1953. Predatism by the adult hymenopteron parasite and its role in biological control. —J. Econ. Entomol., 46, 541–544.Google Scholar
  8. Hartley, E. A. — 1922. Some bionomics ofAphelinus semiflavus (Howard), chalcid parasite of aphids. —Ohio J. Sci., 22, 209–236.Google Scholar
  9. Johnston, F. A. — 1915. Asparagus-beetle egg parasites. —J. Agric. Res., 4, 303–313.Google Scholar
  10. Legner, E. F. — 1976. Low storage temperature effects on the reproductive potential of three parasites ofMusca domestica. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 69, 435–441.Google Scholar
  11. — 1977. Temperature, humidity and depth of habitat influencing host destruction and fecundity of muscoid fly parasites. —Entomophaga, 22, 199–206.Google Scholar
  12. Legner, E. F. &Brydon, H. W. — 1966. Suppression of dung-inhabiting fly populations by pupal parasites. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 59, 638–651.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Legner, E. F. &Dietrick, E. I. — 1972. Inundation with parasitic insects to control filth breeding flies in California. —Proc. Calif. Mosq. Control Assoc., Inc., 40, 129–130.Google Scholar
  14. Legner, E. F. &Gerling, D. — 1967. Host-feeding and oviposition onMusca domestica bySpalangia cameroni, Nasonia vitripennis, andMuscidifurax raptor [Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae] influence their longevity and fecundity. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 60, 678–691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Legner, E. F. &Olton, G. S. — 1968. Activity of parasites from Diptera:Musca domestica, Stomoxys calcitrans, and species ofFannia, Muscina, andOphyra II. at sites in the Eastern Hemisphere and Pacific area. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 61, 1306–1314.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. — 1971. Distribution and relative abundance of dipterous pupae and their parasitoids in accumulations of domestic animal manure in the southwestern United States. —Hilgardia, 40, 505–535.Google Scholar
  17. Legern, E. F., Bay, E. C. &White, E. B. — 1967. Activity of parasites from Diptera:Musca domestica, Stomoxys calcitrans, Fannia canicularis andF. femoralis, at sites in the Western Hemisphere. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 60, 462–468.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Le François 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. F. Legner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaRiversideUSA

Personalised recommendations