Skip to main content
Log in

Nodulation and nitrogen fixation in Purshia: inoculation responses and species comparisons

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Nitrogen fixing trees and shrubs may be useful in revegetation efforts. Speculation that insufficient endophyte populations in surface soils may limit non-leguminous symbiotic nitrogen fixation in marginal land was explored.Purshia tridentata andP. glandulosa seedlings were grown in greenhouse trials using ten soils from nativePurshia sites. Treatments include a control, an inoculated treatment, and six mmole nitrogen amendment. When inoculated with aP.tridentata crushed nodule inoculum, two of five non-nodulating soils and three sparsely nodulating soils produced well nodulated plants. Inoculation also increased nodule mass, total nitrogen, nitrogen content and shoot dry mass in plants from some of the soils. Of the three soils failing to produce nodulated plants when inoculated, one produced plants that responded well to nitrogen additions but failed to nodulate under low nitrogen conditions; another produced severely stunted plants indicating nutritional limitations on the host; and the third produced plants that were not nitrogen deficient. An application of nitrogen completely suppressed nodulation in all but one soil. The twoPurshia species were similar in nodulation, nitrogen fixation and growth, although important exceptions exist that indicate species may differ in adaptability to certain soil conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baker D, Kidd G H and Torrey J G 1979 Separation of actinomycete nodule endophytes from crushed nodule suspensions by sephaden fractionation. Bot. Gaz 140 (Suppl), 549–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bissel H D, Harris B, Strong H and James F 1955 The digestibility of certain natural and artificial foods eaten by deer in California. Calif. Fish Game 41, 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bond G 1976 Observations on the root nodules ofPurshia tridentata. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser B 193, 127–135.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bond G 1976 The results of the IBP survey of root-nodule formation in nonleguminous angiosperms. pp 443–474.In Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Plants. Ed. P S Nutman IBP No 7. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dalton D A and Zobel D B 1977 Ecological aspects of nitrogen fixation byPurshia tridentata. Plant and Soil 48, 57–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Giunta B C, Stevens R, Jorgensen K P and Plummer A P 1978 Antelope bitterbrush. An important wildlife shrub. Utah St. Div. of Wildlife Resource Pub. No. 78-12.

  7. Klemmedson J O 1979 Ecological importance of actinomycete nodulated plants in the western United States. Bot. Gaz. 140 (Suppl), 591–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krebill R G and Muir J M 1974 Morphological characterization ofFrankia purshiae, the endophyte in root nodules of bitterbrush. NW Sci. 48, 243–293.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McArthur E D, Giunta B C and Plummer A P 1974 Shrubs for restoration of depleted ranges and disturbed areas. Utah Sci. 35, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mitchell H L 1972 Microdetermination of total nitrogen in plant tissues. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 55, 1–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nelson D 1978 Personal Communication.

  12. Nord E C 1965 Autecology of bitterbrush in California. Ecol. Monogr. 35, 307–334.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pearson B O 1957 Bitterbrush seed dormancy broken with thiourea. J. Range Manage. 10, 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Plummer A P 1976 Revegetation of disturbed intermountain area sites.In Reclamation and Use of Disturbed Land in the Southwest. Ed. J L Thomas Univ. Ariz. Press Tuscon.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Righetti T L 1980 Soil factors limiting nodulation and nitrogenfixation in bitterbrush (Purshia). Ph. D. Thesis. Univ. Calif., Davis.

  16. Silvester W B 1977 Dinitrogen fixation by plant associations excluding legumes.In A Treatise on Dinitrogen Fixation. Eds. R W F Hardy and W S Silver. Sect. 4. Agronomy and Ecology. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stanford G and Smith S J 1972 Nitrogen mineralization potentials of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 465–472.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Stanton F W 1959 Autecological studies of bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata [Pursh] D.C.). Ph. D. Thesis. Oregon St. Univ, Corvallis.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wagle R F 1958 Early growth in bitterbrush and its reaction to environment. Ph. D. Thesis. Univ. Calif. Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wagle R F and Vlamis J 1961 Nutrient deficiencies in two bitterbrush soils. Ecology 42, 745–752.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Webster S R, Youngberg C T and Wollum I I H G 1967 Fixation of nitrogen by bitterbrush (Purshia tridentata [Pursh] D.C.). Nature London 216, 392–393.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Righetti, T.L., Munns, D.N. Nodulation and nitrogen fixation in Purshia: inoculation responses and species comparisons. Plant Soil 65, 383–396 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02375059

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02375059

Key words

Navigation