Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution, length and weight of roots in young plantations ofEucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden irrigated with recycled water

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The root systems ofEucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden, irrigated with recycled municipal effluent at two sites in north-western Victoria, Australia, were studied by excavation and coring. Trees at Robinvale were four years-old and were irrigated using micro-sprays that covered only 70% of the ground surface area, whereas at Mildura, effuent was uniformly was uniformly applied to six years-old trees by flood and sprinkler irrigation.

At Mildura where roots were excavated from a 2.80×2.80×1.20 m block of soil, a total root length of 1193 m.m−2 and a total root weight of 3.1 kg m−2 were estimated in the top metre. For roots >1 mm diameter, 77% of intercepts were at 0–30 cm, whereas only 50% were in the 50–100 cm soil horizon.

At both sites where roots in the top 30 cm were studied by coring, the vertical distributions of root intercepts, length and weight were similar. Root length was greatest in the 0–10 cm soil horizon at both sites, and intercepts of roots <1 mm diameter comprised 73% and 81% of all roots at Mildura and Robinvale respectively. Roots <1 mm diameter contributed 85% of total length at both sites, but only 19% and 21% of total weight at Mildura and Robinvale respectively. The horizontal distribution of roots differed at the two sites. With uniform application of effuent at Mildura, root intercepts and length were concentrated in the centre of the irrigation bay, but at Robinvale, the concentration occurred closer to the tree row due mainly to the different method of irrigation. Root weight at both sites was highest within 50 cm of the tree row.

Root densities of 0.11 to 0.57 cm cm−3 were estimated in the two plantations; these were similar to root densities measured inPinus radiata D. Don plantations up to 46 months old, but were considerably lower than those estimated for pastures. The implications of the results for the management of irrigated plantations of eucalypts are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashton D H 1975 The root and shoot development ofEucalyptus regnans F. Muell. Aust. J. Bot. 23, 867–887.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cockcroft B and Wallbrink J C 1966 Root distribution of orchard trees. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 17, 49–54.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cockcroft B and Tisdall J M 1978 Soil Management, soil structure and root activity.In Modification of Soil Structure. Eds W W Emerson, R D Bond and A R Dexter. pp. 387–391. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flinn D W, Stewart H T L and O'Shaughnessy P J 1979 Screening of weedicides for overspraying Eucalyptus, Pinus and Casuarina on clay soils irrigated with treated effluent. Aust. For. 42, 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feller M C 1980 Biomass and nutrient distribution in two eucalypt forest ecosystems. Aust. J. Ecol. 5, 309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heth D and Donald D G M 1978 Root biomass ofPinus radiata D. Don. S. Afr. For. J. 107, 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Incoll W D 1979 Root system investigations in stands ofEucalyptus regnans. For. Comm. Vic., For. Tech. Pap. 27, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McKimm R J 1984 Fence posts from young tress irrigated with sewage effluent. Aust. for. 47, 172–178.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nambiar E K S 1981 Ecological and physiological aspects of the development of roots: from nursery to forest. Proc. Aust. For. Nutr. Workshop on Productivity in Perpetuity, Canberra, A. C. T., Aug. 1981, pp. 117–129.

  10. Nambier E K S 1983 Root development and configuration in intensively managed radiata pine plantations. Plant and Soil 71, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Northcote K H 1979 A Factual Key for the Recognition of Australian Soils. 4th ed., Rellim Tech. Publ., Adelaide, 124 p.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Northcote K H, Hubble G D, Isbell R F, Thompson C H and Bettenay E 1975 A description of Australian Soils. CSIRO, Melbourne, 170 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roberts J 1976 A study of root distribution and growth in aPinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) plantation in East Anglia. Plant and Soil 44, 607–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Squire R O, Marks G C and Craig F G 1978 Root development in aPinus radiata D. Don plantation in relation to site index, fertilizing and soil bulk density. Aust. For. Res. 8, 103–114.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stewart H T L and Flinn D W 1984 Establishment and early growth of tress irrigated with wastewater at four sites in Victoria, Australia. For. Ecol. Manage. 8, 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Westman W E and Rogers R W 1977 Biomass and structure of a subtropical eucalypt forest, North Stradbroke Island. Aust. J. Bot. 25, 171–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldwin, P.J., Stewart, H.T.L. Distribution, length and weight of roots in young plantations ofEucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden irrigated with recycled water. Plant Soil 97, 243–252 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374947

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374947

Key words

Navigation