Skip to main content
Log in

Experiments on competitiveness of three endomycorrhizal fungi

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This paper examines competition between three VA endophytes places respectively as “inoculant” fungus in an inner compartment (300 ml) below the germinating seed, and as “indigenous” fungus in an outer compartment (900 ml). Previously prepared infested soil was used as source of the endophytes. Inner and outer compartment roots were harvested separately and percentage infection determined for each fungus, using diagnostic anatomical features of each fungus. Changes in colonisation patterns were followed up to 4 and 5 months. Treatments with non-infested soil in the outer compartment were used to compare infectivity and spread of the different endophytes.

All three endophytes were able to invade soil already colonised by either of the other two, butGlomus fasciculatum (E3) was more invasive thanGlomus tenue. This pattern appeared to be related to rates of spread of the fungi in the non-infested soil. The pattern was not affected by host, clover or sorghum, or by position, immediately below the seed or in the outer compartment.

It seemed that the endophyte in the inner compartment had overriding and persistent effects on plant growth, unrelated to its dominance pattern or share of overall root infection at the later harvests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbott L K and Robson A D 1984 The effect of root density and infectivity of inoculum on the development of VA mycorrhizas. New Phytol. 97, 285–299.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abbott L K and Robson A D 1984 Colonization of the root system of subterranean clover by three species of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 96, 275–281.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buwalda J G, Ross G J S, Stribley D P and Tinker P B 1982 The development of endomycorrhizal root systems. III. The mathematical representation of the spread of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in root systems. New Phytol. 91, 669–682.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buwalda J G, Ross G J S, Stribley D P and Tinker P B 1982 The development of endomycorrhizal root systems. IV. The mathematical analysis of effects of phosphorus on the spread of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in root systems. New Phytol. 92, 392–401.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Daft M J and Hogarth B G 1983 Competitive interaction amongst four species of Glomus on maize and onion. Trans. Br Mycol. Soc. 80, 339–345.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniels B A, McCool P M and Menge J A 1981 Comparative inoculum potential of spores of six vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 89, 385–391.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duchaufour Ph and Bonneau M 1969 Une méthode nouvelle du dosage du phosphore assimilable dans les sols forestiers. Bulletin de l'Association Française pour l'Etude du Sol, No. 4. 193–205.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giovannetti M and Mosse B An evaluation of techniques for emasuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal infection in roots. New Phytol. 84, 489–500.

  9. Hall I R and Fish B J 1979 A key to the Endogonaceae. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 73, 261–270.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lopez-Aguillon R 1985 Les complexes mycorhiziens: interaction entre champignons et effet sur la croissance de la plante. Thèse Doctorat — Université de Nancy I, 127 p.

  11. Marsh B a'b 1971 Measurement of length in random arrangements of lines (short communication). J. Appl. Ecol. 8, 265–267.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mosse B, Warner A and Clark A C 1981 Plant growth responses to vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza. XIII. Spread of an introduced endophyte and residual growth effects of inoculation in the second year. New Phytol. 90, 521–528.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Olsen S T, Cole C U, Watanabe F S and Dean L A 1954 Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S.D.A. Circular no. 959, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Powell C Li 1979 Spread of mycorrhizal fungi through soil. N.Z.J. Agric. Res. 22, 335–339.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders F E and Sheikh N A 1983 The development of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrizal infection in plant root systems. Plant and Soil 71, 223–246.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith S E and Walker N A 1981 A qualitative study of mycorrhizal infection in Trifolium: separate determination of the rates of infection and mycelial growth. New Phytol. 89, 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Warner A 1980 Factors affecting the spread of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. University of London Thesis 174 pp.

  18. Warner A and Mosse B 1982 Factors affecting the spread of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in soil. I. Root density. New Phytol. 90, 529–536.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wilson J M and Trinick M J 1983 Infection development and interaction between vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 93, 543–553.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson J M 1984 Comparative development of infection by three vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 97, 413–426.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson J M 1984 Competition for infection between vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 97, 427–435.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopez-Aguillon, R., Mosse, B. Experiments on competitiveness of three endomycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 97, 155–170 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374938

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374938

Key words

Navigation