Skip to main content
Log in

Growth responses of several plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate P-fertility

II. Soil fumigation induced stunting of plants corrected by reintroduction of the wild endomycorrhizal flora

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A greenhouse experiment was carried out comparing the growth of various plant species in non-fumigated, fumigated, and fumigated-inoculated soils. The soil used contained numerous pieces of root of Broom-Corn Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) that were found intensely colonized by indigenous endomycorrhizal fungi. The soil was fumigated with methyl bromide and the inoculum used was a mixture of VA mycorrhizal root fragment from plants grown in the field from which the soil was collected. Plants used were cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var Copenhagen Market), carrot (Daucus carota L. var. Nantaise), leek (Allium porrum L. var. American Flag), marigold (Tagetes patulus L. var. Golden Boy), tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill. var. Michigan Ohio), sweet corn (Zea mays L. var. Span Cross) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L. var. Glenlea). No phosphorus was added to the soil which contained 93 μg/g of available P (bray II). All plants tested formed mycorrhizae except cabbage. Generally, values of the root endomycorrhizal colonization (REC) index were higher in fumigated-inoculated soil than in non-fumigated soil. Cabbage grew equally well in fumigated and fumigated-inoculated soil, but better than in non-fumigated soil. Cabbage did not form VA mycorrhizae and its better growth in fumigated soil was tentatively attributed to the destruction of soil-borne pathogens and the absence of competition. Wheat grew equally well in the three treatments, because 93 μg/g of available P is sufficient for wheat growth and thus the mycorrhizae were not efficient. The five other plant species used were severely stunted in fumigated soil and the inoculation permitted the reestablishment of normal growth as in non-fumigated soil. Growth stimulation is attributed to the efficiency of VA mycorrhizae since these plants were mycorrhizal in non-fumigated soil and in fumigated-inoculated soil. Stunting of these plants in fumigated soil was due to the destruction of VA mycorrhizae since results show that this stunting cannot be attributed to methylbromide residues in the soil. Moreover soil pH and nutrient content were not markedly changed after fumigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berch S M 1979 Endomycorrhizae of Southern Ontario ferns. M. Sc. thesis, University of Waterloo, 79 p.

  2. Bray, R H and Kurtz L T 1945 Determination of total organic and available forms of phosphorus. Soil Sci. 59, 39–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bryan W C and Kormakik P P 1977 Mycorrhizae benefit survival and growth of sweetgum seedlings in the nurserey. South J. Appl. For. 1, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conseil des productions végétales du Québec 1980 Grilles de fertilisation. Gouvernement du Québec, M.A.P.A. Québec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan D 1955 Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics 11, 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hewitt E J 1966 Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. Tech. Comm. 22 (2nd edition revised) Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hirrel M C, Mehravaran H and Gerdemann J W 1978 Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in theChenopodiaceae andCruciferae: do they occur? Can. J. Bot. 56, 2813–2817.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kleinschmidt G D and Gerdemann J W 1972 Stunting of citrus seedlings in fumigated nursery soils related to the absence of endomycorrhizae. Phytopathology 62, 1447–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin J P, Aldrich D G, Murphy W S and Bradford G R 1953 Effect of soil fumigation on growth and chemical composition of citrus plants. Soil Sci. 75, 137–151.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Menge J A, Lembright H and Johnson E L V 1977 Utilisation of mycorrhizal fungi in citrus nurseries. Proc. Int. Soc. Citri-culture 1, 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Menge J A, Labanauskas C K, Johnson E L V and Platt R G 1978 Partial substitution of mycorrhizal fungi for phosphorus fertilization in the greenhouse culture of citrus. Soil Sci. Am. J. 42, 926–930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Newcomb D A 1975 Mycorrhiza effect following soil fumigation. Proc. Int. Plant Propagators' Soc 25, 102–104.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peech M 1945 Determination of exchangeable cations and exchange capacity of soil. Soil Sci. 59, 25–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Plenchette C, Furlan V and Fortin J A 1982 Effects of different endomycorrhizal fungi of five host plants grown on calcined montmorillonite clay. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 107, 535–538.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Plenchette C, Fortin J A and Furlan V 1983 Growth responses of several plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate P-fertility. I. Mycorrhizal dependency under field conditions. Plant and Soil 70, 199–209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Raymond R, Laflamme G and Godbout G 1976 Pédologie du comté de Portneuf. Dir. Gén. Rech. and Ens. Agriculture Québec, Bull. tech. 18, 164 p.

  17. Reed J F and Cummings R W 1945. Soil reaction — Glass electrode and colorimetric methods for determining pH values of soils. Soil Sci. 59, 97–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schenck N C and Tucker D P H 1974 Endomycorrhizal fungi and the development of citrus seedlings in Florida fumigated soils. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 99, 284–287.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shuman G E, Stanley M A and Knudsen D 1973 Automated total nitrogen analysis of soil and plant samples. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 37, 480–481.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sleeth B 1954 Methyl bromide injury to citrus seedlings. J. Rio Grande Valley Hortic. Soc. 8, 32–83.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Timmer L W and Leyden R F 1978 Stunting of citrus seedlings in fumigated soils in Texas and its correction by phosphorus fertilization and inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 103, 533–537.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tucker D P H and Anderson C A 1972 Correction of citrus seedlings stunting on fumigated soils by phosphate applications. Proc. Flo. State Hortic. Soc. 85, 10–12.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

To be submitted by C. Plenchette in partial fulfillment for the Ph.D. degree at Laval University. Soil Research Service contribution #315.M.A.P.A.Q.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Plenchette, C., Fortin, J.A. & Furlan, V. Growth responses of several plant species to mycorrhizae in a soil of moderate P-fertility. Plant Soil 70, 211–217 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374781

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374781

Key words

Navigation