Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Acid tolerance of Pacific Northwest conifers in solution culture

I. Effect of high aluminium concentration and solution acidity

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Seedlings of three Pacific northwest conifer species: Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco), western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.), and western redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn) were grown in acid nutrient solutions with and without aluminium present. The acid treatments were paired so as to differentiate the effects of aluminium from the hydrogen ion concentration that a specific level of Al-cations induces via hydrolysis reactions. Relative to agronomic plants, all the conifers were found tolerant of the acid solutions and high levels of aluminium. Species differed in their relative tolerance to H and Al-cations. Douglas-fir and western redcedar both displayed similar or better growth in nutrient containing 175 ppm Al than in solutions at the same pH (3.0) without aluminium. In contrast to the other species, western hemlock survived and thrived in acid solution of pH 3 while the presence of Al in acid solution adversely affected seedling root growth and tissue divalent cation concentrations, especially calcium and magnesium. Therefore, the ability of western hemlock to grow in acid conditions is postulated to be related to this species' physiological tolerance of excess H-cations in solution and low tissue requirements of Ca and Mg. This tolerance of H-cation concentrations found for western hemlock meant that the specific effects of high Al concentrations in solution could be differentiated in hemoock seedling growth and nutrition from those effects caused by increased H-concentration due to Al-hydrolysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartlett R J and Reigo D C 1972 Toxicity of hyroxy Al in relation to pH and P. Soil Sci. 114, 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black C A 1968. Soil-Plant Relationships John Wiley and Sons, London, 792 p.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clarkson D T and Sanderson J 1971 Inhibitation of the uptake and long-distance transport of calcium by aluminium and other polyvalent cations. J. Exp. Bot. 22, 837–851.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Coulter B S 1969 The chemistry of hydrogen and aluminium ions in soils, clay minerals and resins. Soils Fert. 39, 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crook W M 1964 The measurement of the cation-exchange capacity of plant roots. Plant and Soil 21, 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis D E 1949 Some effects of calcium deficiency on the anatomy ofPinus taeda. Am. J. Bot. 36, 276–282.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Evers F H 1983 Ein Versuch zur Aluminum-Toxizität bei Fichte. Forst-und Holzw. 102, 305–307.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fawzy H, Overstreet R and Jacobson L 1954 The influence of hydrogen ion concentration on cation absorption by barley roots. Plant Physiol. 29, 258–261.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Foy C D 1974 Effects of aluminium on plant growth.In Plant Root and its Environment. Ed. E W Carson. pp 601–642. Virg. Poly. State Univ.

  10. Foy C D, Chaney R L and White M C 1978 The physiology of metal toxicity in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29, 511–566.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Foy C D and Fleming A L 1978 The physiology of plant tolerance to excess available aluminium and manganese.In Crop Tolerance to Suboptimal Land Conditions. Ed. G A Jung. pp 301–328. Spec. Publ. 32, Am, Soc. Agron., Madison, Wis.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Havlin J L and Soltanpour P N, 1980 A nitric acid plant digest method for use with inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 11, 969–980.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heilman P E 1981 Minerals, Chemical properties and fertility of forest soils.In Forest Soils of the Douglas-Fir Region. Eds. P E Heilman, H W Anderson and D M Baumgartner. Wash. State Univ., Coop. Exten. Serv., Pullman, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Humphreys F R and Truman R 1964 Aluminium and phosphorus requirements ofPinus radiata. Plant and Soil 20, 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ingestad T 1979 Mineral nutrient requirements ofPinus silvestris andPicea abies seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 45, 373–380.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobson L, Moore D P and Hamapel R J 1960 Role of calcium in absorption of monovalent cations. Plant Physiol. 35, 352–358.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones L H, 1961 Aluminium uptake and toxicity in plants. Plant and Soil. 13, 297–310.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leyton L 1952 The effect of pH and form of nitrogen on the growth of Sitka spruce seedlings. Forestry 25, 32–40.

    Google Scholar 

  19. McCormick L H and Steiner K C 1978 Variation in aluminium tolerance among six genera of trees. For. Sci. 24, 565–568.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McLean E O 1976 Chemistry of soil aluminium. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 7, 619–6365.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mengel K and Kirkby E A 1978 Principles of Plant Nutrition. International Potash Inst., Berne, Switzerland. 593 p.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Meurisse R T 1976 Some chemical and other properties of western hemlock soils in Oregon — Their relationship to productivity.In Proceedings of the Western Hemlock Management Conference. Eds. W A Atkinson and R J Zasoski. pp 49–55. College For. Res., Univ. Wash., Seattle, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Minore D 1972 Germination and early growth of coastal tree species on organic seed beds. USDA For. Serv. Res. Pap. ONW-135.

  24. Moore D P 1974 Physiological effects of pH on roots.In Plant Root and its Environment. Ed E W Carson. pp 134–151. Virg. Poly. State Univ.

  25. Mullette K J 1975 Stimulation of growth in Eucalyptus due to aluminium. Plant and Soil 42. 495–499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Nie N H, Hull C H, Jenkins J G, Steinbrenner K and Bent D h 1975 SPSS: Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. 2nd Ed. McGraw-hill, New York. 342 p.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nye R H and Tinker P B 1977 Solute Movement in the Soil-Root System. Univ. California Press, Berkeley. 342 p.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Parkinson J A and Allen S E 1975 A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological material. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 6, 1–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rains D W, Schmid W E and Epstein E 1964 Absorption of cations by roots. Effects of hydrogen ions and essential role of calcium. Plant Physiol. 39, 274–278.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rost-Siebert K 1983 Aluminium-Toxizität und-Toleranz an Keimpflanzen von Fichte (Picea abies Karst.) und Buche (Fagus silvatica L.). Allgem. Forst. 38, 686–689.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ryan P J 1983 The role of acid and aluminium-rich media in the growth and nutrition of Pacific Northwest conifers. Ph.D Thesis, Univ. Wash., Seattle, Wash. 336 p.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rygiewicz P T 1983 Effects of Mycorrhizas and pH on Nitrogen and Potassium Fluxes in Pacific N.W. Coniferous Roots. Ph.D Thesis, Univ. Wash., Seattle, Wash. 189 p.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Steiner K C, McCormick L H and Canavera D S 1980 Differential response of paper birch provenances to aluminium in solution culture. Can. J. For. Res. 10, 25–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tischner R, Kaiser U and Hüttermann A 1983 Utersuchungen zum Einflass von Aluminiumlonen auf das Washstum von Fichtenkeimlingen in Abhängigkeit vom pH-wert. Forstwissen Centralb. 102, 329–336.

    Google Scholar 

  35. van den Driessche R 1976 Mineral nuitrition of western hemlock.In Proceedings of the Western Hemlock Management Conference. Eds. W A Atkinson and R J Zasoski. pp 56–70. College For. Res., univ. Wash., Seattle, Wash.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Walker R B, Gessel S P and Haddock P G 1955 Greenhouse studies in mineral requirements of conifers: Western Redcedar. For. Sci. 1, 51–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Waring R H and Franklin J F 1979 Evergreen coniferous forest of the Pacific Northwest. Science 224, 1380–1386.

    Google Scholar 

  38. White R E 1976 Studies on mineral ion absorption by plants. III The interaction of aluminium, phosphate, and pH on the growth ofMedicago sativa. Plant and Soil 46, 195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  39. White R E, Tiffin L O and Taylor A W 1976 The existence of polymeric complexes in dilute solutions of aluminium and orthophosphate. Plant and Soil 45, 521–529.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wood Technology and Forest Research Division, Forestry Commission of NSW, PO Box 100, 2119, Beecroft, NSW, Australia

    P. J. Ryan

  2. College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, 98195, Seattle, WA, USA

    S. P. Gessel & R. J. Zasoski

Authors
  1. P. J. Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. P. Gessel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. J. Zasoski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryan, P.J., Gessel, S.P. & Zasoski, R.J. Acid tolerance of Pacific Northwest conifers in solution culture. Plant Soil 96, 239–257 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374768

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374768

Key words

Search

Navigation