Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 68, Issue 1, pp 97–113 | Cite as

Soil and plant tests for available sulfur in wetland rice soils

  • M. M. Islam
  • F. N. Ponnamperuma
Article

Summary

Soil tests, plant performance, and plant tissue analyses were used to study the availability of sulfur to wetland rice in 30 Philippine soils.

The critical concentrations of available sulfur by the calcium phosphate, lithium chloride, ammonium acetate, and hydrochloric acid extractions were 9, 25, 30, and 5 mg/kg, respectively.

The critical total sulfur limits were 0.11% in the shoot at maximum tillering 0.055% in the straw at maturity, and 0.065% in the grain. The critical N:S ratio was 15 in the shoot at maximum tillering, 14 in the straw at maturity, and 26 in the grain. The critical sulfate-sulfur limit was 150 mg/kg in the shoot at maximum tillering and 100 mg/kg in the straw at maturity. The critical sulfate-sulfur/total sulfur percentage ratio was 15% in the shoot at maximum tillering and the straw at maturity.

Plant performance, judged by appearance and yield of dry matter, straw, and grain, was generally poorer in the sulfur deficient soils than in the other soils. Although the calcium phosphate and ammonium acetate methods gave a better correlation between plant performance and available sulfur than the others, all four methods separated sulfur-deficient soils from non-deficient ones. The hydrochloric acid method merits further study because it is simple and versatile.

Key words

Available sulfur Eh Critical sulfur Nitrogen Nitrogen/sulfur ratio pH Rice Soil solution Sulfur Wetland rice 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blair G J, Mamaril C P and Momuat E 1978 Sulfur-nutrition of wetland rice. IRRI Res. Pap. Series No. 21, 29 p.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blair G J, Mamaril C P and Ismunadji M 1980 Sulfur deficiency of soils in the tropics as a constraint to food production.In Soil related constraints to food production in the tropics, IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradsley C and Lancaster J D 1960 Sulfur. pp 1102–1116.In. Methods of soil analysis. Eds. C A Blacket al. Amer. Soc. Agron. Inc. Wisconsin. 1572 p.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang S C 1978 Evaluation of the fertility of the rice soils. pp 521–541.In The International Rice Research Institute. Soils and rice. Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chapman H D and Pratt P F 1961 Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. University of Calif. Div. of Agric. Sci. 309 p.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Datta S K and Craswell E T 1980 Nitrogen fertility and fertilizer management in wetland rice. Paper presented at the Special Symposium during the 20th Anniversary Celebration of the International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines. (In press).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Evans L T 1975 Sulfur in agriculture. pp 3–8.In Sulfur in Australian Agriculture. Ed. K D McLachlan, Sydney Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fox R L, Olson R A and Rhoades H F 1964 Evaluating the sulfur status of soil by plant and soil tests. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 28, 243–246.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freney J R and Spencer K A 1960 Soil sulfate changes in the presence and absence of growing plants. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 11, 339–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goswami N N and Banerjee N K 1978 Phosphorus, potassium and other macroelements. pp 561–580.In The International Rice Research Institute. Soils and rice. Los Baños, Philippines.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hasan S M, Fox R L and Boyd C C 1970 Solubility and availability of adsorbed sulfur in Hawaiian soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 897–901.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    IFDC (International Fertilizer Development Center) 1979 Sulfur in the tropics. Muscle Shoals, Alabama, 69 p.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) 1964 Annual report for 1963. Los Baños, Philippines. 199 p.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    IRRI (International Rice Research Institute) 1971 Annual report for 1970. Los Baños, Philippines. 265 p.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jones M B 1962 Total sulfur and sulfate sulfur in subterranean clover as related to sulfur responses. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 26, 482–484.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jones M B 1975 Plant assays for the recognition of deficiency. pp 174–181.In Sulphur in Australian Agriculture. Ed. K D McLachlan. Sydney Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones M B and Martin W E 1964 Sulfate sulfur concentration as an indicator of sulfur status in various California dryland pasture species. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 28, 539–541.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Katyal J C and Ponnamperuma F N 1974 Zinc deficiency: a widespread nutritional disorder of rice in Agusan del Norte. Philipp. Agric. 58, 79–89.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mengel K and Kirkby E A 1978 Principles of plant nutrition. International Potash Institute, Worblaufen-Switzerland. 593 p.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nelson L A and Anderson R L 1977 Partitioning of soil test—crop response probability. pp 19–38.In Soil testing correlating and interpreting the analytical results. Am. Soc. Agron. Special publication No. 29, Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Osiname O A and Kang B T 1975 Response of rice to sulfur application under upland conditions. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 6, 585–598.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    PCARR (Philippine Council for Agriculture and Resources Research) 1979 National workshop in the standardization of methods of analysis for soil, water, plant and fertilizers.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ponnamperuma F N 1977 Physicochemical properties of submerged soils in relation to fertility. IRRI Res. Pap. Series No. 5. 32 p.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ponnamperuma F N, Cayton M T C and Lantin R S 1981, Dilute hydrochloric acid as an extractant for available Zn, Cu and B in rice. Plant and Soil 61, 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roberts S and Koehler F E 1968 Extractable and plant available sulfur in representative soils of Washington. Soil Sci. 106, 53–59.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sanchez P A 1976 Properties and management of tropical soils. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 618 p.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sen A T 1938 Further experiments on the occurrence of depressed yellow patch of paddy in Mandalay Farm. Burma Dept. Agric. Rep. 1937–1938.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith F W and Dolby G R 1977 Derivation of diagnostic indices for assessing the S-status ofPanicum maximum var.trichoglume. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 8, 221–240.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spencer K, Freney J R and Jones M B 1978 Diagnosis of S-deficiency in plants. pp 507–514.In Plant nutrition 1978. Proc. 8th International Colloquium on Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Suzuki A 1977 Influence of S-nutrition in some aspects of amino acid metabolism and diagnosis of S-deficiency of crop plants. Bull. Nat'l. Inst. Agric. Ser. B. 29, 49–106.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Van Raalte M H 1944 On the oxidation environment by roots. Ann. Bot. Gard. Buitenzorg. Vol. Hors Series. May 1944.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang C H 1976 S-fertilization of rice. pp 149–169.In Food and Fertilizer Technology Center. ASPAC, Taiwan, China.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yoshida S, Forno D A, Cock J H and Gomez K A 1976 Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines, 83 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Islam
    • 1
  • F. N. Ponnamperuma
    • 1
  1. 1.The International Rice Research InstituteLos BañosPhilippines

Personalised recommendations