Skip to main content
Log in

Response ofBromus inermis inoculated withGlomus fasciculatum to potassium fertilization and drought stress

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Bromus inermis Leyss. was grown in a 2×2×2 factorial design using different levels of mycorrhizal inoculation (inoculated and noninoculated), soil water stress (Ψ1 or −0.8 MPa) and potassium (K) fertilization (0 or 150 ppm) as factors. Soil water stress and mycorrhizal inoculation significantly reduced plant top dry weight during the 18 week study. Chlamydospore production by the mycorrhizal symbiontGlomus fasciculatum (Thaxter sensu. Gerd.) Gerd. and Trappe was significantly reduced by soil water stress of −0.8 MPa. Potassium (K) fertilization did not significantly influence plant top growth or mycorrhizal colonization. However, foliar Ca and Mg were significantly lower in plants fertilized with K. Foliar Ca and Mg concentrations of P, K, N, Mn, Zn and Cu were significantly greater in drought stressed plants whereas Ca and Mg concentrations were significantly greater in well-watered plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Allen E B 1984 University of Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station Scientific Report Number SA 1261.

  2. Allen M F 1982 New Phytol. 91, 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen E B and Allen M F 1980 J. Appl. Ecol. 17, 139–147.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen E B and Cunningham G L 1983 New Phytol. 93, 227–236.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Allen M Fet al. 1981 New Phytol. 88, 683–693.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bildusas I Jet al. 1985 New Phytol. (in press).

  7. Chapman H D and Pratt P F 1961 University of California Division of Agricultural Science, Berkley, California, 309 p.

  8. Dahlquist R L and Knoll J W 1978 Appl. Spectros. 32, 1–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Daniels B A and Trappe J M 1980 Mycologia, 72, 457–471.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerdemann J W and Nicolson T H 1963 Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 46, 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gildon A and Tinker P B 1981 Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 77, 648–649.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Granger R Let al. 1983 Can. Plant Sci. 63, 551–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grimme H 1974 10th Congress of the International Potash Institute, Berne.

  14. Hayman D S 1983 Can. J. Bot. 651, 944–963.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoagland D R and Arnon D I 1939 California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 347, 35 p.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kahn A G 1972 New Phytol 71, 613–619.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kramer P J 1984 Academic Press, New York, New York, 496 p.

  18. Lambert D Het al. 1979 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43, 976–980.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mengel K and Krikby E A 1979 International Potash Institute, Switzerland, 593 p.

  20. Neumann N H and Thurtell G W 1972 Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Logan, Utah.

  21. Nielsen J D and Jensen A 1983 Plant and Soil, 70, 165–172.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Phillips J M and Hayman D S 1970 Transactions of the British Mycological Society, 55, 158–161.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Powell C L 1975 Academic Press, New York, 999 pp.

  24. Rhodes L H and Gerdemann J W 1980 The Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio.

  25. Ross J P and Harper J A 1970 Phytopathology, 60, 1552–1556.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Snellgrove R Cet al. 1982 New Phytol. 92, 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bildusas, I.J., Pfleger, F.L., Stewart, E.L. et al. Response ofBromus inermis inoculated withGlomus fasciculatum to potassium fertilization and drought stress. Plant Soil 95, 441–444 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374625

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374625

Key words

Navigation