Skip to main content
Log in

Dose- and time-response assessments ofHeterorhabditis heliothidis andSteinernema feltiae [Nem.: Rhabitida] againstAedes aegypti larvae

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Steinernema feltiae (=Neoaplectana carpocapsae) andHeterorhabditis heliothidis were tested against 3rd instarAedes aegypti larvae in the laboratory. Different dosages of the nematodes and varying durations of exposure were assessed.H. heliothidis was more effective thanS. feltiae. Larval mortality showed a positive linear correlation with both nematode dosage and the duration of exposure. The number of nematodes of both species that gained access to the haemocoele of larvae was always low, but increased with dosage and exposure time. The rate of melanization of the nematodes in the larvae was correlated with dosage, but was not affected by the duration of exposure.

Résumé

Steinernema feltiae (=Neoaplectana carpocapsae) etHeterorhabditis heliothidis ont été essayés en laboratoire vis-à-vis des larves de 3e Stades d'Aedes aegypti. Différentes doses de nématodes et des durées variables d'exposition ont été utilisées.H. heliothidis était plus efficace queS. feltiae. La mortalité larvaire montrait une corrélation linéaire positive avec à la fois la dose en nématodes et la durée d'exposition. Le nombre de nématodes des 2 espèces qui gagnait l'haemocèle des larves était toujours faible, mais il augmentait avec la dose et la durée d'exposition. Le taux de mélanisation des nématodes dans les larves était en corrélation avec la dose, mais il n'était pas affecté par la durée d'exposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedding, R. A., Molyneux, A. S. &Akhurst, R. J. — 1983.Heterorhabditis spp.,Neoaplectana spp., andSteinernema kraussei: interspecific and intraspecific differences in infectivity for insects. —Exp. Parasitol., 55, 249–257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dadd, R. H., — 1971. Size limitations on the infectivity of mosquito larvae by nematodes during filter-feeding. —J. Invertebr. Pathol., 18, 246–251.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finney, J. R. &Harding, J. B.. — 1981. Some factors affecting the use ofNeoaplectana sp. for mosquito control. —Mosquito News, 41, 798–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaugler, R., Kaplan, B., Alvarado, C., Montoya, J. &Ortega, M.. — 1983. Assessment ofBacillus thuringiensis serotype 14 andSteinernema feltiae [Nematoda: Steinernematidae] for control of theSimulium vectors of onchocerciasis in Mexico. —Entomophaga, 28, 309–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, P. S. &Plackett, R. L.. — 1979. The Interpretation of Quantal Responses in Biology. —Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P. R., Wood, H. A., Burand, J. P. &Granados, R. R.. — 1984. Quantification of the dose-mortality response ofTrichoplusia ni, Heliothis zea andSpodoptera frugiperda to nuclear polyhedrosis viruses: application of an exponential model. —J. Invertebr. Pathol., 43, 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaya, H. K.. — 1978. Infectivity ofNeoaplectana carpocapsae andHeterorhabditis heliothidis to pupae of the parasite,Apanteles militaris. —J. Nematol., 10, 241–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, A. S., Bedding, R. A. &Akhurst, R. J.. — 1983. Susceptibility of larvae of the sheep blowfly,Lucilia cuprina to variousHeterorhabditis spp.,Neoaplectana spp., and an undescribed steinernematid (Nematoda). —J. Invertebr. Pathol., 42, 1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Poinar, G. O. Jr. &Kaul, H. N.. — 1982. Parasitism of the mosquitoCulex pipiens by the nematodeHeterorhabditis bacteriophora. —J. Invertebr. Pathol., 39, 382–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G.. — 1963. The defence reactions of insects to metazoan parasites. —Parasitology, 53, 527–642.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandner, H. &Stanuszek, S.. — 1971. Comparative research on the effectiveness and production ofNeoaplectana carpocapsae S.L. —Zesz. Probl. Postepow Nauk Roln., 121, 209–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, W. R.. — 1981. Biological control ofOtiorhynchus sulcatus with heterorhabditid nematodes in the glasshouse. —Netherlands J. Plant Pathol., 87, 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, H. E. &Bronskill, J. F.. — 1962. Parasitism of mosquito larvae by the nematode, DD-136 [Nematoda: Neoaplectanidae]. —Can. J. Zoology, 40, 1263–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouts, W. M., Mracek, Z., Gerdin, S. &Bedding, R. A.. — 1982.Neoaplectana Steiner 1929 a junior synonym ofSteinernema Travassos, 1927. (Nematoda: Rhabditida) —Systematic Parasitol., 4, 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Molta, N.B., Hominick, W.M. Dose- and time-response assessments ofHeterorhabditis heliothidis andSteinernema feltiae [Nem.: Rhabitida] againstAedes aegypti larvae. Entomophaga 34, 485–493 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374386

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02374386

Key-Words

Mots Clés

Navigation