, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 583–591 | Cite as

Allometric scaling in the postcanine dentition with reference to primate diets

  • Phyllis L. Pirie


Allometric analysis of maxillary postcanine tooth area (Y) compared to adult skull length (X) in 34 species of higher primates has revealed a very close relationship. The derived least squares equation is logY=2.223 logX−2.311 with a correlation coefficient of .98. The value of 2.223 for the allometric coefficient suggests that tooth area may be in part related to the amount of food ingested.

Although most of the species examined fit this equation very closely, several could be identified as being slightly deviant. In general, the direction of this deviance can be related to known dietary preferences. Relatively large molars are found in leaf-eaters (Alouatta, Presbytis, Colobus) and in the grass and seed eatingTheropithecus. Relatively small molars are found in primates with insectivorous preferences (Cebuella, Callithrix, Saguinus, andSaimiri) and in one frugivore (Ateles).

The suggestion is made that the amount of mastication required by the preferred food is one factor in determining the most adaptive tooth size.


Animal Ecology Prefer Food Allometric Scaling Dietary Preference Tooth Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altmann, S. A. &J. Altmann, 1970.Baboon Ecology: African Field Research. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Bertrand, M., 1969.The Behavioral Repertoire of the Stumptail Macaque. S. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  3. Biggerstaff, R. H., 1966. Metric and taxonomic variation in the dentition of two Asian Cercopithecoid specis ofMacaca.Amer. Journ. Phys. Anthrop., 24: 231–238.Google Scholar
  4. Brody, S., 1945.Bioenergetics and Growth. Hafner Publ. Co., New York.Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter, C. R., 1964.Naturalistic Behavior of Nonhuman Primates. Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park.Google Scholar
  6. Chalmers, N. R., 1968. Group composition, ecology and daily activities of free-living mangabeys in Uganda.Foila primat., 8: 247–262.Google Scholar
  7. Crook, J. H. &P. Aldrich-Blake, 1968. Ecological and behavioral contrasts between sympatric ground dwelling primates in Ethiopia.Folia primat., 8: 192–227.Google Scholar
  8. DeVore, I. &K. R. L. Hall, 1965. Baboon ecology. In:Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes,I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 20–52.Google Scholar
  9. Fooden, J., 1966. Identification of the stump-tailed monkey,Macaca speciosa I. Geoffroy 1826.Folia primat., 5: 153–164.Google Scholar
  10. ————, 1969.Taxonomy and Evolution of the Monkeys of Celebes (Primates: Cercopithecidae). S. Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
  11. ————, 1971. Report on primates collected in western Thailand, January—April 1967.Fieldiana Zoology, 59: 5–62.Google Scholar
  12. Goodall, J., 1965. Chimpanzees of the Gombe Stream Reserve. In:Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes,I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 425–473.Google Scholar
  13. Gould, S. J., 1970. Evolutionary paleontology and the science of form.Earth Sci. Rev., 6: 77–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ————, 1975. On the scaling of tooth size in mammals.Amer. Zoologist, 15: 351–362.Google Scholar
  15. Hershkovitz, P., 1963. A systematic and zoogeographic account of the monkeys of the genusCallicebus (Cebidae) of the Amazonas and Orinoco river basins.Mammalia, 27: 1–80.Google Scholar
  16. Hladik, C. M., 1975. Ecology, diet and social patterning in Old and New World primates. In:Socioecology and Psychology of Primates,R. H. Tuttle (ed.), Mouton Publ., The Hague, pp. 3–35.Google Scholar
  17. Huxley, J. S., 1932.Problems of Relative Growth. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  18. Hylander, W. L., 1975. Incisor size and diet in anthropoids with special reference to Cercopithecidae.Science, 189: 1095–1098.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, C. &J. Sabater Pí, 1968. Comparative ecology ofCercocebus albigena andCercocebus torquatus.Folia primat., 9: 99–113.Google Scholar
  20. ----Jones, C. & ----J. Sabater Pí, 1971. Comparative ecology ofGorilla gorilla (Savage & Wyman) andPan troglodytes (Blumenbach) in Rio Muni, West Africa.Biblio. primat., 13: 1–96.Google Scholar
  21. Kern, J. A., 1964. Observations on the habits of the proboscis monkey,Nasalis larvatus (Wurmb), made in the Brunei Bay area, Borneo.Zoologica, 49: 183–192.Google Scholar
  22. Kinzey, W. G., 1974. Ceboid models for the evolution of hominoid dentition.Journ. Hum Evol., 3: 193–203.Google Scholar
  23. Kleiber, M., 1947. Body size and metabolic rate.Physiol. Rev., 27: 511–541.Google Scholar
  24. ————, 1961.The Fire of Life: An Introduction to Animal Energetics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Klein, L. L. &D. J. Klein, 1975. Social and ecological contrasts between four taxa of neotropical primates. In:Socioecology and Psychology of Primates,R. H. Tuttle (ed.), Mouton Publ., The Hague, pp. 59–85.Google Scholar
  26. Lindburg, D. G., 1971. The rhesus monkey in North India: an ecological and behavioral study. In:Primate Behavior: Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Vol. 2,L. A. Rosenblum (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–106.Google Scholar
  27. Moynihan, M., 1976.The New World Primates: Adaptive Radiation and the Evolution of Social Behavior, Languages, and Intelligence. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  28. Pirie, P. L., 1976. Allometry in the masticatory apparatus of primates. Ph. D. Dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  29. Reynolds, V. &F. Reynolds, 1965. Chimpanzees of the Budongo forest. In:Primate Behavior: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes,I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 368–424.Google Scholar
  30. Rowell, T. E., 1966. Forest-living baboons in Uganda.Journ. Zool., 149: 344–364.Google Scholar
  31. Schaller, G. B., 1961. The orang-utan in Sarawak.Zoologica, 46: 73–82.Google Scholar
  32. Simpson, G. G., A. Roe, &R.C. Lewontin, 1960.Quantitative Zoology. (R. ed.) Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York.Google Scholar
  33. Struhsaker, T. T. &J. F. Oates, 1975. Comparison of the behavior and ecology of red colobus and black-and-white colobus monkeys in Uganda: A summary. In:Socioecology and Psychology of Primates,R. H. Tuttle (ed.), Mouton Publ., The Hague, pp. 103–123.Google Scholar
  34. Tappen, N. C., 1960. Problems of distribution and adaptation of the African monkeys.Cur. Anthrop., 1: 91–120.Google Scholar
  35. Thorington, R. W., Jr., 1967. Feeding and activity ofCebus andSaimiri in a Colombian forest. In:Progress in Primatology,D. Stark,R. Schneider, &H. Kuhn (eds.), Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, pp. 180–184.Google Scholar
  36. Walker, P. &P. Murray, 1975. An assessment of masticatory efficiency in a series of anthropoid primates with special reference to the Colobinae and Cercopithecinae. In:Primate Functional Morphology and Evolution,R. H. Tuttle (ed.), Mouton Publ., The Hague, pp. 135–150.Google Scholar
  37. Wolpoff, M. H., 1971. A functional measure of tooth size.Southwestern Journ. Anthrop., 27: 279–286.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phyllis L. Pirie
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VictoriaUSA

Personalised recommendations