Advertisement

Primates

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 483–492 | Cite as

Field ecology and behaviour of the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta): I. Group composition, home range, roosting sites, and foraging routes in the Asarori Forest

  • S. C. Makwana
Article

Abstract

The data presented here resulted from about 1,100 observation hours in a nine-month field study of rhesus monkey from January to October 1976 in the Asarori Forest, Dheradun. Six groups were studied, the group size varied from 6–90 individuals. With the exception of one group, all were of the bisexual multimale type. The number of adult males per group varied from two to seven, and of adult females from 4 to 27. The adult sex ratio was male 1 to females 2.2–3.7 (mean 1:2.7). The exceptional group originally consisted of five juveniles only (3 ♂, 2 ♀); later on an adult male joined the group. Home ranges varied from 1.3–13.4 km2 and overlapped extensively with another. The area of home range showed straight line relationship with group size. Roosting sites were not fixed but changed from night to night. The straight line distance between one night to the next varied from 75–2,500 m. Foraging routes per day ranged from 1,050–3,500 m (mean 1,803.3±160.2). There is a significant relationship between the foraging route (L) and the straight line distance between roosting sites (D). The ratio D/L varies from 0.14–0.87.

Keywords

Significant Relationship Field Study Group Size Home Range Adult Male 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jay, P. C., 1965. The common langur of North India. In:Primate Behaviour: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes,I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 197–247.Google Scholar
  2. ————, 1965. Quoted fromLindburg, 1971..Google Scholar
  3. Lindburg, D. G., 1971. The rhesus monkey in North India: An ecological and behavioural study. In:Primate Behaviour; Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, Vol. 2,L. A. Rosenblum (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–106.Google Scholar
  4. Makwana, S. C., in press. Development and behaviour of an independent and stable all juvenile group.Biology of Behaviour.Google Scholar
  5. Mukherjee, A. K. &S. Gupta, 1965. Habits of rhesus macaque,Macaca mulatta (Zimmermann) in the Sunderbans, 24-Parganas, West Bengal.J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc., 62: 145–146.Google Scholar
  6. Mukherjee, R. P., 1969. A field study on the behaviour of two roadside groups of rhesus macaque,Macaca mulatta (Zimmermann) in northern Uttar Pradesh.J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc., 66: 47–56.Google Scholar
  7. ————, 1972. Group composition and population density of rhesus monkey,Macaca mulatta (Zimmermann) in Northern India.Primates, 13: 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Neville, M. K., 1968a. Ecology and activity of the Himalayan foot-hill rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Ecology, 40: 110–123.Google Scholar
  9. ————, 1968b. A free-ranging rhesus monkey troop lacking adult males.J. Mammal., 49: 771–773.Google Scholar
  10. Prakash, I., 1962. Group organization, sexual behaviour and breeding season of certain Indian monkeys.Jap. J. Ecol., 12: 83–86.Google Scholar
  11. Rahman, H. &M. D. Parthasarthy, 1969. The home range, roosting places and the day ranges of the bonnet macaque (Macaca radiata).J. zool., 157: 267–276.Google Scholar
  12. Roonwal, M. L., 1976. Dominance behaviour in South Asian Primates.J. Sci. Industr. Res., New Delhi, 35: 244–260.Google Scholar
  13. ---- &S. M. Mohnot, 1977.Primates of South Asia: Ecology, Sociobiology and Behaviour. Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  14. Singh, S. D., 1969. Urban monkeys.Scientific Amer., 221: 108–115.Google Scholar
  15. Southwick, C H., M. A. Beg, &M. R. Siddiqi, 1965. Rhesus monkeys in north India. In:Primate Behaviour: Field Studies of Monkeys and Apes,I. DeVore (ed.), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, pp. 111–159.Google Scholar
  16. Sugiyama, Y., K. Yoshiba, &M. D. Parthasarthy, 1965. Home range, mating season, male group and inter-troop relations in Hanuman langurs (Presbytis entellus).Primates, 6: 73–106.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. C. Makwana
    • 1
  1. 1.University of JodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations