Skip to main content
Log in

La spécificité deDiadromus pulchellus [Hyménoptère: Ichneumonidae] vis-à-vis de son hôteAcrolepiopsis assectella, la teigne du poireau

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Résumé

La spécificité deDiadromus pulchellus vis-à-vis de son hôte habituel,Acrolepiopsis assectella, est testée à l'aide de 3 autres espèces de Lépidoptère,Plutella xylostella, Ephestia kuehniella etPlodia interpunctella. D. pulchellus parasite spontanémentA. assectella etP. xylostella, que les chrysalides soient nues ou avec leur cocon et que les larves soient élevées ou non sur leur plante hôte. Les 2 autres espèces ne sont parasitées que si elles sont introduites dans un cocon d'A. assectella ou deP. xylostella. Le cocon est donc un des éléments de la spécialisation deD. pulchellus. Il pourrait s'agir de facteurs physiques liés à la structure du cocon, mais également de composés chimiques insolubles présents dans la soie et les glandes labiales mais absents des glandes mandibulaires. La spécificité deD. pulchellus, essentiellement éthologique, semble renforcée par des facteurs physiologiques nutritionnels, la mortalité deD. pulchellus étant plus élevée dansP. unterpunctella que dans les autres espèces hôtes, en particulierA. assectella etE. kuehniella. La base trophique des larves est donc plus large que la base de ponte des femelles. Les parasitoïdes entièrement élevés surE. kuehniella ouP. interpunctella étant incapables de pondre spontanément dans les chrysalides des espèces dont ils sont issus, l'hypothèse d'Hopkins est ici infirmée.

Summary

The specificity of the IchneumonidD. pulchellus towards its usual host-pupa,A. assectella, is tested using 3 other lepidopteran species,Plutella xylostella, Ephestia kuehniella andPlodia interpunctella. The female wasp spontaneously parasitizes the pupae ofA. assectella andP. xylostella whether they are inside their cocoons or not (naked pupae) and whether the larvae are reared on their host plant,Allium porrum or on a synthetic diet.P. interpunctella andE. kuehniella pupae are not parasitized even if they are covered with very attractive larval frass ofA. assectella, whether they are inside their own cocoons or not. These 2 species are only parasitized if they are introduced in a cocoon ofA. assectella orP. xylostella.

The pupal cuticular waxes and the cocoon are 2 of the possible elements important in the specialization of the host choice byD. pulchellus. Studies in scanning electron microscopy show that the physical structure ofA. assectella andP. xylostella cocoons has similarities. But non soluble chemicals in the silk can have an influence. The female wasps are sensitive to ground cocoons and to crushed labial glands but not to crushed mandibular glands.

The parasitoid specificity for small moths feeding on plants producing sulfur volatiles is essentially behavioural, but seems to be reinforced by some nutritional factors. The wasp mortality is higher inP. interpunctella pupae than in the other species tested. Moreover, positive correlations exist between the size of the host pupae and of the parasitoid, and the development duration of the moths and ofD. pulchellus. Thus, the trophic basis of parasitoid larvae is wider than the oviposition basis of female parasitoid. The wasps reared inE. kuehniella or inP. interpunctella do not spontaneously oviposit in the pupae of these two species. Therefore in this example,Hopkins hypothesis is invalidated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliographie

  • Arnault, C. — 1982. Conséquences de l'alimentation artificielle sur le développement larvaire de la teigne du poireau,Acrolepiopsis assectella. —Entomol. Exp. Appl., 32, 116–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, A. P. — 1971. Associative learning byNemeritis canescens [Hym.: Ichneumonidae]. —Can. Entomol., 103, 1137–1141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, A. P. — 1981. Host acceptance by parasitoids. In: Semiochemicals, their role in Pest Control (D. A. Nordlund, R. L. Jones &W. J. Lewis, eds.). —John Wiley & Sons, N.Y., 97–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askew, R. R. — 1971. Parasitic insects. —Heinemann Educ. books, London, 316 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atwal, A. S. — 1958. The seasonal activity and oviposition behaviour of two parasites of the Diamond back moth,Plutella maculipennis (Curt.) [Tineidae: Lepidoptera]. —Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Entomol., 4, 889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, D. J. &Van den Bosch, R. — 1972. Host range and specificity ofMonoctonus paulensis [Hym.: Braconidae] a parasite of certain Dactynotine aphids. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 65, 422–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carton, Y., Bouletreau, M., Van Alphen, J. J. M. & Van Lenteren, J. C. — 1986. TheDrosophila parasitic wasps. In: Genetic and Biology ofDrosophila. — Academic Press, 3, 347–394.

  • Corbet, S. A. — 1973. Mandibular gland secretion of larvae of the flour moth,Anagasta kuehniella contains an epideitic pheromone and elicits oviposition movements in hymenopteran parasite. —Nature, 232, 481–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenhuis, H. H. — 1966. Host specificity in the parasites and hyperparasites of apple aphids. In: Ecology of aphidophagous insects (I. Hodek, ed.). —W. Junk Pub., the Hague, 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frediani, D. — 1957. Note sullaThyraella collaris Gray [Hym.: Ichneumonidae] parassita de l'Acrolepia assectella Zell. in Toscana. —Boll. Lab. Entomol. Agric. Portici, 15, 231–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, A. P. — 1970. Studies on host selection and host specificity of the aphid hyperparasiteCharips victorix [Hym.: Cynipidae]. 6. Description of sensory structures and a synopsis of host selection and host specificity. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 63, 1705–1709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. D. — 1917. A description of C. G. Hervitt's paper on “insect behavior”. —J. Econ. Entomol., 10, 92–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike, J. — 1982. Environmental modification of oviposition behaviour inDrosophila. —Amer. Nat., 119, 784–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermy, T. — 1984. Evolution of insect/host plant relationships. —Amer. Nat., 124, 609–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmes, R. — 1984. Examen des problèmes posés par la sympatrie surAcrolepiopsis assectella [Lép.: Hyponomeutoïde] dans le Sud-Est de la France, des deux Hyménoptères Ichneumonidés,Diadromus collaris etDiadromus pulchellus. —Thèse d'Etat, Univ. Tours, 187 p.

  • Kalmes, R. &Rojas-Rousse, D. — 1980. Etude du bilan nutritionnel deDiadromus collaris et deD. pulchellus [Hym.: Ichneumonidae] appartenant à deux populations sympatriques endoparasites solitaires de chrysalides d'Acrolepiopsis assectella [Lép.: Hyponomeutoidae]. —Entomol. Exp. Appl., 27, 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labeyrie, V. — 1960. Contribution à la dynamique des populations d'insectes: I. Influence stimulatrice de l'hôte,Acrolepiopsis assectella Z., sur la multiplication d'un Hyménoptère ichneumonidae (Diadromus sp.). —Entomophaga, Mém. H.S., 1, 193 p.

  • Lecomte &Pouzat, J. — 1985. Réponses électroantennographiques de deux parasitoïdes Ichneumonidés,Diadromus pulchellus etD. collaris, aux odeurs de végétaux, du phytophage hôteAcrolepiopsis assectella et du partenaire sexuel. —Entomol. Exp. Appl., 39, 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecomte, C. &Thibout, E. — 1983. Analyse, en olfactomètre tubulaire, de l'influence de différents stimulus olfactifs dans la recherche de l'hôte parDiadromus pulchellus [Hym.: Ichneumonidae]. —Entomophaga, 28, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecomte, C. &Thibout, E. — 1984. Etude olfactométrique de l'action de diverses substances allélochimiques végétales dans la recherche de l'hôte parDiadromus pulchellus [Hym.: Ichneumonidae]. —Entomol. Exp. Appl., 35, 295–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lecomte, C. &Thibout, E. — 1986. Analyse dans deux types d'olfactomètres du comportement de quête des femelles deDiadromus pulchellus en présence d'odeurs du phytophage hôte et du végétal attaqué ou non. —Entomophaga, 31, 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. J. &Vinson, S. B. — 1971. Suitability of certainHeliothis [Lep.: Noctuidae] as hosts for the parasiteCardiochiles nigriceps. —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 64, 970–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, D. C. — 1940. Host selection by Hymenopterous parasites of the mothPlutella maculipennis Curtis. —Proc. Roy. Soc. London B, 128, 451–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudd, A. &Corbet, S. A. — 1982. Response of the Ichneumonid parasiteNemeritis canescens to kairomones from the flour moth,Ephestia kuehniella. —J. Chem. Ecol., 8, 843–850.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Noyes, J. S. — 1974. The biology of the leek-moth,Acrolepia assectella (Zeller). —Ph. D. Thesis, London, 264 p.

  • Rojas-Rousse, D. — 1980. Examen de quelques problèmes posés à propos des fluctuations du taux sexuel chez un hyménoptère entomophage,Diadromus pulchellus (Ichneumonide). —Thèse d'Etat, Univ. Tours, 214 p.

  • Smith, M. A. &Cornell, H. V. — 1979. Hopkins host-selection inNasonia vitripennis and its implications for sympatric speciation. —Anim. Behav., 27, 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. R. — 1957. A catalogue of the parasites and predators of insect pests 2: Host parasite Catalogue. 4: Hosts of the Hymenoptera [Ichneumonidae]. —Commonw. Inst. Biol. Cont., Ottawa, 561 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. E. &Leonard, D. E. — 1977. The role of kairomones in host recognition and host acceptance behavior of the parasiteBrachymeria intermedia. —Environ. Entomol., 6, 527–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lenteren, J. C. — 1981. Host discrimination by parasitoids. In: Semiochemicals, their role in pest-control (D. A. Nordlund, R. L. Jones &W. J. Lewis, eds.). —John Wiley & Sons, N.Y., 153–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vet, L. E. M. — 1984. Comparative ecology of hymenopterous parasitoids. —Offesdruk. Kanters B.V., Alblasserdam, 218 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S. B. — 1976. Host selection by insect parasitoids. —Annu. Rev. Entomol., 21, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S. B. — 1981. Habitat location. In: Semiochemicals, their role in pest control (D. A. Nordlund, R. L. Jones &W. J. Lewis, eds.). —John Wiley & Sons, N.Y., 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinson, S. B. & Iwantsch, G. F. — 1980. Host suitability for insect parasitoids. —Annu. Rev. Entomol., 397–419.

  • Vinson, S. B., Barfield, C. S. &Henson, R. D. — 1977. Oviposition behavior ofBracon mellitor a parasitoid of the boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis). II. Associative learning. —Physiol. Entomol., 2, 157–164.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weseloh, R. M. — 1974. Host recognition by the gypsy moth larval parasitoid,Apanteles melanoscelus. —Ann. Entomol. Soc., 67, 583–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, C. — 1975. The evolutionary relationship between adult oviposition preferences and larval host plant range inPapilio machaon L. —Oecologia, 18, 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thibout, E. La spécificité deDiadromus pulchellus [Hyménoptère: Ichneumonidae] vis-à-vis de son hôteAcrolepiopsis assectella, la teigne du poireau. Entomophaga 33, 439–452 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373181

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373181

Mots Clés

Key-Words

Navigation