Skip to main content
Log in

Host specificity and aspects of the biology ofCalligrapha pantherina (Col.: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent ofSida acuta [Malvaceae] andS. rhombifolia in Australia

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The host specificity of a chrysomelid beetle,Calligrapha pantherina Stål, from Mexico, was verified in the CSIRO quarantine facilities in Brisbane, Australia on 80 species of plants in 28 families, either closely related to Malvaceae or in families containing economically important species.C. pantherina oviposited and developed successfully on its preferred host,S. acuta, and less successfully onS. rhombifolia andS. spinosa, all of which are weeds in Australia. Aspects of oviposition, larval development, and adult feeding and longevity ofC. pantherina are described.C. pantherina was released in Australia during 1989 and readily established onS. acuta but established at only a few sites onS. rhombifolia.

Résumé

La spécificité de la chrysomèle originaire du Mexique,Calligrapha pantherina, vis-à-vis de son hôte a été contrôlée, dans les installations de la quarantaine du C.S.I.R.O. à Brisbane (Australie), sur 80 espèces de plantes appartenant à 28 familles, étroitement liées aux Malvacées ou comprenant des espèces d'importance économique.

C. pantherina pond et se développe avec succès sur son hôte préférentielS. acuta et avec moins de succès surS. rhombifolia etS. spinosa, qui sont toutes des mauvaises herbes d'Australie.

On a décrit les aspects de l'oviposition, du développement larvaire, de l'alimentation des adultes et de la longévité deC. pantherina. C. pantherina fut lâchée en Australie en 1989 et s'est bien installée surS. acuta mais seulement en quelques sites surS. rhombifolia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Gillett, J. D., Harley, K. L. S., Kassulke, R. C. &Miranda, H. J. — 1991. Natural enemies ofSida acuta andS. rhombifolia (Malvaceae) in Mexico and their potential for biological control of these weeds in Australia. —Environ. Entomol., 20, 882–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V. &Herberger, J. P. — 1977. The world's worst weeds: Distribution and biology. —The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, pp 621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmidt, H. E. & Johnson, R. W. — 1977. Weeds of Queensland. —Q. DPI., pp. 469.

  • Mott, J. J. — 1980. Germination and establishment of the weedsSida acuta andPennisetum pedicellatum in the Northern Territory. —Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb., 20, 463–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtz, J. D., Harrison, P. G. andFalvey, L. — 1975. Regional pasture development and associated problems II Northern Territory. —Tropical Grasslands, 9, 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Deceased

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forno, I.W., Kassulke, R.C. & Harley, K.L.S. Host specificity and aspects of the biology ofCalligrapha pantherina (Col.: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent ofSida acuta [Malvaceae] andS. rhombifolia in Australia. Entomophaga 37, 409–417 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373114

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373114

Key-Words

Mots Clés

Navigation