Skip to main content
Log in

Response of adult parasitoids ofBemisia tabaci (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) to leaf residues of selected cotton insecticides

  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The contact toxicity of eight insecticides to adults of four parasitoids of the sweetpotato whiteflyBemisia tabaci was evaluated in the laboratory. Two common Texas species,Eretmocerus sp. andEncarsia pergandiella Howard, and two exotic species,Eretmocerus mundus Mercet from Spain andEncarsia formosa Gahan from Greece were tested. Insecticides, applied as sprays to greenhouse-grown cotton plants at recommended rates were amitraz (Ovasyn®), azinphosmethyl (Guthion®), bifenthrin (Capture®), buprofezin (Applaud®), cypermethrin (Ammo®), methyl parathion and thiodicarb (Larvin®), with a water control. Parasitoid adults were confined on discs cut from leaves (1) sprayed the same day and (2) sprayed two days previously. Survival in both treatments was measured two and four days following exposure. Significant differences in toxicity were detected among the insecticides. Buprofezin was not toxic to any of the four parasitoids. When caged on leaves sprayed two days previously, only amitraz of the remaining compounds allowed significant general parasitoid survival after two days.E. mundus exhibited the greatest overall tolerance to insecticides, with 40% or more surviving 48 hr after confinement on leaves sprayed with amitraz, thiodicarb and cypermethrin. Survival was generally much reduced after 96 hr. In a separate test, fresh residues of endosulfan (Thiodan®) were highly toxic at the two rates tested, but two day old residues at the lower rate allowed 76.7% survival ofE. mundus and 35% survival ofE. pergandiella after 48 hrs.

Résumé

La toxicité par contact de huit insecticides contre des adultes de quatre parasitoïdes deBemisia tabaci a été évaluée au laboratoire. Deux espèces locales,Ertmocerus sp. etEncarsia pergandiella Howard, et deux espèces exotiques,Eretmocerus mundus Mercet originaire d'Espagne etEncarsia formosa Gahan originaire de Grèce ont été testées. Des insecticides ont été pulvérisés aux concentrations recommandées sur cotonnier cultivé en serre. Les insecticides utilisés étaient l'amitraze (Ovasyn), l'azinophosmethyl (Guthion), la bifenthrine (Capture), la buprofézine (Applaud), la cyperméthrine (Ammo), le méthyl parathion et le thiodicarbe (Larvin) avec une pulvérisation d'eau pour les témoins. Les adultes de parasitoïdes ont été placés sur des disques découpés dans les feuilles, (1) pulvérisés le même jour et (2) pulvérisés deux jours auparavant. Deux et quatre jours après le traitement des disques, la survie des parasitoïdes adultes a été mesurée. Des différences significatives de toxicité ont été détectées parmi les insecticides.

La buprofézine n'a eu aucun effet toxique sur les quatre parasitoïdes. L'amitraze a permis une survie significative après deux jours.E. mundus a montré la plus grande tolérance envers les insecticides, avec 40% ou plus de survie, 48 h après avoir été confiné sur les feuilles pulvérisées avec l'amitraze, le thiodicarb, et la cyperméthrine. La survie a été, en général, très réduite après 96 h. Dans un essai à part, les résidus frais d'endosulfan (Thiodan) ont été très toxiques avec les concentrations utilisées, mais les résidus de deux jours d'âge avec une concentration plus faible ont permis une survie de 76,7% deE. mundus et de 35% pourE. pergandiella.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelrahman, A. A. — 1986. The potential of natural enemies of the cotton whitefly in Sudan Gezira. —Insect Sci. Applic., 7, 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akey, D. H., Henneberry, T. J. &Chu, C. C. — 1993. Control studies on field populations of the sweetpotato whitefly,Bemisia tabaci in Arizona upland and pima cotton. In: Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference, 1993 Proceedings. (D. J. Herber &Richter D. A., eds.) p. 675–679. — Nat. Cotton Council, Memphis, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. — 1989. Farm chemicals handbook 1989. —Meister Publishing CO., Willoughby, Ohio.

  • Bellows, Jr., T. S. &Arakawa, K. — 1988. Dynamics of preimaginal populations ofBemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) andEretmocerus sp. (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) in southern California cotton. —Environ. Entomol., 17, 483–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellows, Jr., T. S., Perring, T. M., Gill, R. J. &Headrick, D. H. — 1994. Description of a species ofBemisia (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 87, 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. K., Frohlich, D. R. &Rosell, R. C. — 1995. The sweetpotato or silverleaf whiteflies: biotypes ofBemisia tabaci or a species complex? —Annu. Rev. Entomol., 40, 511–534.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G. D., Jr., &Henneberry, T. J. — 1983. Sweetpotato whitefly and parasite populations in sprayed cotton plots. —Arizona Agri. Exp. Sta., P-61, 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, R. I., Wraight, S. P. &Jones, W. A. — 1993. An overview of biological control of the sweetpotato whitefly,Bemisia tabaci. In: Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference, 1993 Proceedings. (Herber D. J., &Richter, D. A., eds.) p. 680–685. — Nat. Cotton Council, Memphis, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. D., Perrin, R. M., Jutsum, A. R. & Jackson G. J. — 1984. Insecticides for the future: a package of selective compounds for the control of major crop pests. —Proc. Brit. Crop Prot. Conf., Pests and Diseases, p. 299–304, Brighton Metropole, England, Nov. 19–22, 1984, vol 1. (not seen,vide Croft 1990).

  • Croft, B. A. — 1990. Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides.John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delorme, R., Berthier, A. &Augé, D. — 1985. The toxicity of two pyrethroids toEncarsia formosa and its hostTrialeurodes vaporariorum; prospecting for a resistant strain of the parasite. —Pestic. Sci., 16, 332–336.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, R. V. — 1990. Integrating biological control of whiteflies into crop management. In: Whiteflies: Their Bionomics, Pest Status and Management. (D. Gerling ed.) p. 315–335. —Intercept, Ltd, Andover, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling, D. — 1967. Bionomics of the whitefly-parasite complex associated with cotton in southern California (Homoptera: Aleurodidae [sic]; Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). —Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 60, 1306–1321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling, D. — 1986. Natural enemies ofBemisia tabaci, biological characteristics and potential as biological control agents: a review. —Agric. Ecosys. Environ. 17, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerling, D. &Sinai, P., — 1994. Buprofezin effects on two parasitoid species of whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). —J. Econ. Entomol., 87, 842–846.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greathead, D. J. &Bennett, F. D. — 1981. Possibilities for the use of biotic agents in the control of the white fly,Bemisia tabaci. —Biocontr. News Info., 2, 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habtu, F. F. &Samsøe-Petersen, L. — 1987. Semi-field method for testing side effects of pesticides on adults of the parasitic waspEncarsia formosa (Gahan) (Hym., Aphelinidae). —J. Appl. Entomol., 104, 473–479.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S. A. — 1985. Standard methods to test the side-effects of pesticides on natural enemies of insects and mites developed by the IOBC/WPRS Working Group “Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms”. —Bull. OEPP/EPPO, 15, 214–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S. A., Bigler, F., Bogenschütz, H., Boller, E., Brun, J., Calis, J. N. M., Coremans-Pelseneer, J., Duso, C., Grove, A., Heimbach, U., Helyer, N., Hokkanen, H., Lewis, G. B., Mansour, F., Moreth, L., Polgar, L., Samsøe-Petersen, L., Sauphanor, B., Stäubli, A., Sterk, A., Vainio, A., van de Veire, M., Viggiani, G. &Vogt, H. — 1994. Results of the sixth joint pesticide testing programme of the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group “Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms”. —Entomophaga, 39, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havron, A., Rosen, D., Prag, H. &Rössler, Y. — 1991. Selection for pesticide resistance inAphytis I.A. holoxanthus, a parasite of the Florida red scale. —Entomol. exp. appl., 61, 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelmer, K. A. &Osborne, L. S. — 1990. Biological control of sweetpotato whitefly in Florida with predators and parasitoids. In: Sweetpotato whitefly-mediated vegetable disorders in Florida. (Yokomi, R. K., Narayanan, K. R., &Schuster, D. J., eds.) p. 77–78. — University of Florida, Miami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelmer, K. A., Osborne, L. S. &Yokomi, R. K. — 1991. Foliage disorders in Florida associated with feeding by sweetpotato whitefly,Bemisia tabaci. —Fla Entomol., 74, 162–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogcarspel, A. P. &Jobsen, J. A. — 1984. Laboratory method for testing the side effects of pesticides onEncarsia formosa (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Results with pesticides used on tomato in glasshouses in the Netherlands. —Z. angew. Entomol., 97, 268–278.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, A. R. — 1993. Control strategy for the sweetpotato whitefly,Bemisia tabaci, late in the cotton-growing season. —Phytoparasitica, 21, 281–291.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ishaaya, I., Mendelson, Z. &Melamed-Madjar, V. — 1988. Effect of buprofezin on embryogenesis and progeny formation of sweetpotato whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). —J. Econ. Entomol., 81, 781–784.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jepson, P. C. (ed.) — 1989. Pesticides and Non-target Invertebrates. —Intercept, Ltd., Wimborne, Dorset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W. A., Carruthers, Jr., R. I. &Nordlund, D. A. — 1993. Biological control of the sweetpotato whiteflyBemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in the Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas. In: Proc. XXVIIIth Congr. Nacion. Entomol. (Valenzuela, J. G., &Delgado, L. C., eds.) p. 222. — Cholula, Puebla, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapadia, M. N. &Puri, S. N. — 1991. Toxicity of different insecticides against two parasitoids ofBemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and their persistence againstEncarsia transvena (Timberlake). —Intern. J. Tropic. Agri., 9, 81–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kapadia, M. N., Puri, S. N., Butler, Jr., G. D. &Henneberry, T. J. — 1992. Whitefly,Bemisia tabaci Genn. and parasitoid populations in insecticide treated cotton. —J. Appl. Zool. Res., 3, 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Avila, A. — 1986. Natural enemies. In:Bemisia tabaci — a literature survey on the cotton whitefly with an annotated bibliography. (Cock, J. W., ed.) p. 27–33. —C. A. B. Intern. Inst. Biol. Contr., Ascot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natwick, E. T. — 1993. Silverleaf whitefly control in cotton using various insecticides in the Imperial Valley of California. In: Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference, 1993 Proceedings. (Herber, D. J., &Richter, D. A. eds.) p. 680–685. — Nat. Cotton Council, Memphis, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oomen, P. A. — 1985. Guideline for the evaluation of side-effects of pesticides.Encarsia formosa. —Bull. OEPP/EPPO, 15, 257–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peregrine, D. J. — 1986. The value of amitraz for control ofBemisia tabaci on cotton. —Agri., Ecosys. Environ., 17, 129–133.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Price, J. F. &Schuster, D. J. — 1991. Effects of natural and synthetic insecticides on sweetpotato whiteflyBemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) and its hymenopterous parasitoids. —Fla Entomol., 74, 60–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenheim, J. A. &Hoy, A. — 1988. Genetic improvement of a parasitoid biological control agent: artificial selection for insecticide resistance inAphytis melinus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). —J. Econ. Entomol., 81, 1539–1550.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. — 1988. SAS/STAT Users Guide. — SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharaf, N. S. — 1982. Parasitization of the tobacco whiteflyBemisia tabaci Genn., (Hom., Aleyrodidae) onLantana camera L. in the Jordan Valley. —Z. angew. Entomol., 94, 263–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shires, S. W., Murry, A. & Sadig, S. — 1983. Stickness in cotton: progress in solving the problem. —Shell Agri., May, 1–2.

  • Spollen, K. M. &Hoy, M. A. — 1992. Resistance to carbaryl in populations of the parasiteAphytus melinus DeBach (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae), an important parasitoid ofParabemisia myricae (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae). —Bull. Entomol. Res., 84, 119–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. &Anema, B. P. — 1988. Development of buprofezin for control of whiteflyTrialeurodes vaporariorum andBemisia tabaci on glasshouse crops in the Netherlands and the UK. In: Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Pests and Diseases. No. 1, p. 175–180. — British Crop Protection Council, Thornton Health, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfenbarger, D. A., Riley, D. G., Akey, D. H. &Jones, W. A. — 1994. Endosulfan and bifenthrin in alternate applications and mixtùre against B-strain whitefly. In: Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference, 1993 Proceedings. (Herber, D. J., &Richter, D. A., eds.), p. 901–903. —Nat. Cotton Council, Memphis, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, W.A., Wolfenbarger, D.A. & Kirk, A.A. Response of adult parasitoids ofBemisia tabaci (Hom.: Aleyrodidae) to leaf residues of selected cotton insecticides. Entomophaga 40, 153–162 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373064

Key-Words

Navigation