Advertisement

Entomophaga

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 453–466 | Cite as

The types ofScelionidae [Hymenoptera: Proctotrupoidea] in some Italian collections (Museums of Genoa and Florence, Institute of Portici)

Article

Abstract

A large number ofScelionidae have been described byKieffer who, unfortunately, did not keep a private collection so that the types of his species are scattered and often not recognized in many museums.

This contribution gives information on the types of species described byKieffer, besides a few other authors, on material collected by Italian entomologists.

The finding and the study of old species is fundamental to subsequent revisions and reliable identifications, mostly in this group ofParasitica in which so often new species of economic importance are described.

Keywords

Plant Pathology Economic Importance Reliable Identification Parmi Private Collection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Résumé

Ce travail est consacré aux types deScelionidae de quelques collections italiennes parmi lesquelles on a trouvé 60 holotypes: 50 dans le Museum civil d'histoire naturelle de Gênes, 6 dans le Musée zoologique La Specola de Florence et 4 à l'Institut d'entomologieF. Silvestri à Portici. Il y a 51 espèces décrites parKieffer, 5 parFouts et 1 parMasi, Rondani, Sarra etSilvestri, respectivement. Ces espèces proviennent de plusieurs régions et en particulier de la Méditerranée.

On donne en outre des informations sur des espèces non types, intéressantes au point de vue taxonomie.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashmead, W. H. — 1894. Report on the parasiticCynipidae, part of theBraconidae, theIchneumonidae, theProctotrypidae, and part of theChalcididae. Part II. —J. Linn. Soc., Zool., 25, 56–254.Google Scholar
  2. Fouts R. — 1934. Report on a small collection of parasitic Hymenoptera from Italian Somaliland. —Mem. Soc. entomol. ital., 13, 98–109.Google Scholar
  3. Kieffer, J. J. — 1905. Nouveaux Proctotrypides exotiques. —Annali Mus. civ. Stor. nat. Giacomo Doria, 2, 9–22.Google Scholar
  4. — 1906. Description de nouveaux Hyménoptères. —Ann. Soc. scient. Brux., 30, 160–178.Google Scholar
  5. — 1908. Revision desScelionidae (Hyménoptères). —Ann. Soc. scient. Brux., 32, 111–251.Google Scholar
  6. — 1908 a. Description de quelques nouveaux Serphides. —Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Metz, 25, 1–7.Google Scholar
  7. Kieffer, J. J. — 1909. Description de quelques nouveaux Scélionides d'Europe (Hym.). —Bull. Soc. entomol. Fr., 268–271.Google Scholar
  8. — 1913. Nouveaux Microhyménoptères de l'Afrique équatoriale. —Boll. Lab. Zool. gen. agr. Portici, 7, 105–112.Google Scholar
  9. — 1926.Scelionidae. —Tierreich, 48, 1–885.Google Scholar
  10. Masi, L. — 1933. Raccolte entomologiche nell'Isola di Capraia fatte daC. Mancini eF. Capra (1927–1931).Hymenoptera Terebrantia etPhytophaga. —Mem. Soc. entomol., ital., 12, 16–48.Google Scholar
  11. Masner, L. — 1961. The generaGryon Hal.,Idris Foerst. andHemisius Westw. [Hym., Scelionidae]. —Cas. csl. Spol. entomol., 58, 157–168.Google Scholar
  12. — 1965. The types ofProctotrupoidea [Hymenoptera] in theCharles T. Brues collection at the Museum of Comparative Zoology. —Psyche, Camb., 72, 295–304.Google Scholar
  13. — 1965 a. The types ofProctotrupoidea [Hymenoptera] in the British Museum (Natural History) and in the Hope Department of Entomology, Oxford. —Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist., Suppl. 1, 1–154.Google Scholar
  14. — 1969. The Provancher species ofPrototrupoidea [Hymenoptera]. —Nat. can., 96, 775–784.Google Scholar
  15. Masner, L. &Muesebeck, C. F. W. — 1968. The types ofProctotrupoidea [Hymenoptera] in the United States National Museum. —Bull. U. S. natl. Mus., 270, 1–143.Google Scholar
  16. Rondani, C. — 1874. Nuove osservazioni sugli insetti fitofagi e sui loro parassiti. —Boll. Soc. entomol. ital., 6, 130–136.Google Scholar
  17. 1877. Vesparia parasita non vel minus cognita. —Boll. Soc. entomol. ital., 9, 166–205.Google Scholar
  18. Sarra, R. — 1929–31. Due nuovi imenotteri italiani. —Boll. Lab. Zool. gen. agr. Portici, 24, 223–227.Google Scholar
  19. 1935. Notizie biologiche dellaPlatycleis grisea F. [Orth. — Phasgonuridae]. —Boll. Lab. Zool. gen. agr. Portici, 28, 197–209.Google Scholar
  20. Silvestri, F. — 1932. Contribuzione alla conoscenza delLopus lineolatus (Brullé) e di un suo parassita [Hemiptera Heteroptera Miridae]. — Soc. entomol. Fr., Liv. Cent., 551–565.Google Scholar
  21. Szabo', J. B. — 1965. Remarks on the systematics of the genusIdris Foerster, 1856, with redescription ofIdris coxalis Kieffer, 1908, and description of some new palaearctic species [Hymenoptera, Scelionidae]. —Ann. hist.-nat. Mus. natl. hung., Pars Zool., 57, 367–373.Google Scholar
  22. 1966. Oekologische, ethologische und systematische Untersuchungen an palaearktischen Teleasinen [Hym., Scelionidae]. —Folia entomol. hung., (S.N.), 19, 9–108.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Le François 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Bin
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureInstitute of EntomologyPiacenzaItaly

Personalised recommendations