Skip to main content
Log in

Caractérisation des relations trophiques hétérotypiques antagonistes

  • Opinions
  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

It is difficult to rely solely on simple definitions when making comparisons of the trophic relationships between species, as many relationships can be described by more than one definition and hence intermediate cases and exceptions to general rules are common. The authors suggest, however, that such relationships can be described accurately by using a combination of three parameters. These parameters are 1) the degree of antagonism between the two species being considered, 2) the duration of their association, expressed in terms of the duration of the life-cycle of the animal in the upper trophic level, and 3) the degree of dependence of one species on the other. Parameter 3 is a description of the extent to which the animal in the upper trophic level depends on the animal in the lower level.

Examples of relationships for general interactions are shown in figure 1 and for entomophagous interactions in figure 2. These figures enable «relationships» rather than «associations» to be described, as one species, or individual, can be part of a different relationship if subjected to a different set of conditions. By using the proposed approach, a given relationship can sometimes be ascribed to a particular type of individual (e.g. mother or progeny) or to the joint effect of the many individuals within a population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rabasse, J.M., Tardieux, I. & Lapchin, L. Caractérisation des relations trophiques hétérotypiques antagonistes. Entomophaga 34, 147–152 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372663

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372663

Navigation