Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of waterlogging on young wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) and on soil solutes at different soil temperatures

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We report a study of the mechanism by which the response of plants to waterlogging can be modified by soil temperature. Wheat was grown initially in well-aerated soil in a controlled environment room before the soil was flooded with aerated, deionized water. The soil temperature was maintained constant in the range 6–18°C while the air temperature was at 14°C. Waterlogging damage was greater in plants at the higher soil temperatures when the plants were compared at the same chronological age. However, when compared at the same growth stage, the response to soil temperature was little differenti.e. plants subjected to waterlogging for a long time at low soil temperatures exhibited a similar reduction in growth and other properties as those subjected briefly at higher temperatures. The concentration of dissolved oxygen in the soil solution declined rapidly at all temperatures, being almost zero after 36 h waterlogging. Temperature affected rates of change of the concentrations of dissolved carbon dioxide, ethylene, nitrous oxide, nitrite, nitrate, calcium and potassium. The importance of soil-and plant-determined properties in the waterlogging response of plants at different temperatures are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armstrong W 1979 Aeration in higher plants. Adv. Bot. Res. 7, 225–332.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blackmer A M and Bremner J M 1978 Inhibitory effect of nitrate on reduction of N2O to N2 by soil micro-organisms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 187–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolton J L and McKenzie R E 1946 The effect of early spring flooding on certain forage crops. Sci. Agric. 26, 99–105.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broadbent F E and Clark F 1965 Denitrification.In Soil Nitrogen. Eds. W V Bartholomew and F E Clark. Am. Soc. Agron, Madison pp 344–359.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron D G 1973 Lucerne in wet soils—the effect of stage of regrowth, cultivar, air temperature, and root temperature. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 24, 851–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cannell R Q and Jackson M B 1981 Alleviating aeration stresses.In Modifying the Root Environment to Reduce Crop Stress Eds. G F Arkin and H M Taylor Amer. Soc. Agric. Engineers, St Joseph pp 141–192.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cooper G S and Smith R L 1963 Sequence of products formed during denitrification in some diverse western soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 24, 477–482.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Craswell E T 1978 Some factors influencing denitrification and nitrogen immobilization in a clay soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 10, 241–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Drew M C 1981 Plant responses to anaerobic conditions in soil and solution culture.In Commentaries in Plant Science 2. Ed. H Smith pp 209–223. Pergamon.

  10. Drew M C, Jackson M B and Giffard S 1979 Ethylene-promoted adventitious rooting and development of cortical air spaces (aerenchyma) in roots may be adaptive responses to flooding inZea mays L. Planta Berlin 147, 83–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Drew M C and Lynch J M 1980 Soil anaerobiosis, micro-organisms, and root function. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 18, 37–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Drew M C and Sisworo E J 1979 The development of waterlogging damage to young barley plants in relation to plant nutrient status and changes in soil properties. New Phytol. 82, 301–314.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gambrell R P and Patrick W H 1978 Chemical and microbiological properties of anaerobic soil and sediments.In Plant Life in Anaerobic Environments. Eds. D D Hook and R M M Crawford pp 375–423. Ann. Arbor.

  14. Grable A R 1966 Soil aeration and plant growth. Adv. Agron. 18, 57–106.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heinrichs D H 1972 Root-zone temperature effects on flooding tolerance of legumes. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52, 985–990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hopkins H T, Specht A W and Hendricks S B 1950 Growth and nutrient accumulation as controlled by oxygen supply to the plant roots. Plant Physiol. 25, 193–209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson M B, Drew M C and Giffard S C 1981 Effects of applying ethylene to the root system ofZea mays on growth and nutrient concentration in relation to flooding tolerance. Physiol. Plant. 52, 23–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Luxmoore R J and Stolzy L H 1972 Oxygen diffusion in soil-plant system VI. A synopsis with commentary. Agron. J. 64, 725–729.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lynch J M and Harper S H T 1980 Role of substrates and anoxia in the accumulation of soil ethylene. Soil Biol. Biochem. 12, 363–367.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mees G C and Weatherley P E 1957 The mechanism of water absorption by roots 2, The role of hydrostatic pressure gradients across the cortex. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 147, 381–391.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nommik H 1956 Investigations on denitrification in soil. Acta Agric. Scand. 6, 195–228.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ponnamperuma F N 1972 The chemistry of submerged soils Adv. Agron. 24, 29–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Reid D M and Crozier A 1971 Effect of waterlogging and gibberellin content and growth of tomato plants. J. exp. Bot. 22, 39–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rhoades E D 1967 Grass survival in flood pool areas. J. Soil. Water Conserv. 22, 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Segeta V 1970 Resistance of winter wheats and ryes to direct effects of flooding. Field Crop Abstr. 23, 293–294.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Smith K A and Restall S W F 1971 The occurrence of ethylene in anaerobic soil. J. Soil Sci. 22, 430–443.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sojka R E, Stolzy L H and Kaufmann M R 1975 Wheat growth related to rhizosphere temperature and oxygen levels. Agron. J. 67, 591–596.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stanford G, Legg J O, Dzienia S and Simpson E C 1975 Denitrification and associated nitrogen transformations in soils. Soil Sci. 120, 147–152.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thompson T E and Fick G W 1981 Growth response of alfalfa to duration of soil flooding and to temperature. Agron. J. 73, 329–332.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Trought M C T 1978 Effects of Waterlogging the Soil on the Growth of WheatTricticum aestivum L. Ph.D. Thesis Reading University, U.K.

  31. Trought M C T and Drew M C 1980 The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) 1. Shoot and root growth in relation to changes in the concentrations of dissolved gases and solutes in the soil solution. Plant and Soil 54, 77–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Trought M C T and Drew M C 1980 The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.) 2. Accumulation and redistribution of nutrients by the shoot. Plant and Soil 56, 187–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Trought M C T and Drew M C 1980 The development of waterlogging damage in young wheat plants in anaerobic solution culture. J. Exp. Bot. 31, 1573–1585.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Van't Woudt B D and Hagan R M 1957 Crop responses at excessively high soil moisture levels.In Drainage of Agricultural Lands. Ed. J N Luthin. pp. 514–578 Am. Soc. Agron., Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Varade S B, Stolzy L H and Letey J 1970 Influence of temperature, light intensity, and aeration on growth and root porosity of wheat,Triticum aestivum. Agron. J. 62, 505–507.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trought, M.C.T., Drew, M.C. Effects of waterlogging on young wheat plants (Triticum aestivum L.) and on soil solutes at different soil temperatures. Plant Soil 69, 311–326 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372453

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02372453

Key words

Navigation