Advertisement

Entomophaga

, Volume 27, Supplement 1, pp 45–50 | Cite as

Development of an optimal monitoring program in cotton: Emphasis on spidermites andHeliothis spp.

  • L. T. Wilson
Article

Abstract

To develop a monitoring program requires that not only the spatial pattern of distribution of a species be known, but also the cost of sampling the area(s) within the host plants occupied by a species. As sample unit size (plant, branch, leaf, etc.) decreases, cost to sample each unit decreases, while the number of units required to estimate a population parameter with a given reliability increases. The concept of costreliability allows for available sampling procedures to be compared and the best one to be chosen. The paper discusses several ways in which monitoring costs have been reduced forTetranychus spp.,Heliothis spp. and predators without reducing the reliability of the estimate. These include the use of subsampling plans, binomial sampling and sequential sampling.

Keywords

Host Plant Plant Pathology Spatial Pattern Monitoring Program Sampling Procedure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BEEDEN, P. (1974). Bollworm oviposition on cotton in Malawi.Cotton Grow. Rev. 51: 52–61.Google Scholar
  2. BOYER, W.P., WARREN, L.O. & LINCOLN, C. (1962). Cotton insect scouting in Arkansas.Agric. Exp. Stn Univ. Arkansas Bull. 656.Google Scholar
  3. BYERLY, K.F., GUTIERREZ, A.P., JONES, R.E. & LUCK, R.F. (1978). Comparison of sampling methods for some arthropod populations in cotton.Hilgardia 46: 257–282.Google Scholar
  4. FYE, R.E. (1972). Preliminary investigation of vertical distributions of fruiting forms and insects on cotton plants.J. econ. Ent. 65: 1410–1414.Google Scholar
  5. FYE, R.E., KUEHL, R.O.& BONHAM, C.D. (1969). Distribution of insect pests in cotton fields.USDA ARS misc. Publ. 1140.Google Scholar
  6. GERRARD, D.J. & CHIANG, H.C. (1970). Density estimation of corn rootworm egg populations based upon frequency of occurrence.Ecology 51: 237–245.Google Scholar
  7. INGRAM, W.R., & GREEN, S.M. (1972). Sequential sampling for bollowrms on rain grow cotton in Botswana.Cotton Grow. Rev. 49: 265–275.Google Scholar
  8. KARANDINOS, M.G. (1976). Optimal sample size and comments on some published formulae.Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 22: 417–421.Google Scholar
  9. SMITH, J.W., STADELBACHER, E.A. & GRANT, C.W. (1976). A comparison of techniques for sampling beneficial arthropod populations with cotton.Environ. Ent. 5: 435–444.Google Scholar
  10. STERLING, W. (1975). Sequential sampling of cotton insect populations.Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod. Cont., 19 pp.Google Scholar
  11. STINNER, R.E., BUTLER, G.D., BACHELER, J.S. & TUTTLE, C. (1975). Simulation of temperature-dependent development in population dynamics models.Can. Ent. 107: 1167–1174.Google Scholar
  12. TAYLOR, L.R. (1961). Aggregation, variance and the mean.Nature 189: 733–735.Google Scholar
  13. TAYLOR, L.R. (1965). A natural law for the spatial disposition of insects.Proc. Xllth Int. Congr. Ent. 1964: 396–397.Google Scholar
  14. TAYLOR, L.R. (1971). Aggregation as a species characteristic. Statistical Ecology, Vol. 1. Ed. G.P. Patel, E.D. Pielou & W.E. Waters: 357–377.Google Scholar
  15. WALD, A. (1945). Sequential analysis in inspection and experimentation. Columbia Univ. Press, 321 pp.Google Scholar
  16. WILSON, L.T. & GUTIERREZ, A.P. (1980). Within-plant distribution of predators on cotton: Comments on sampling and predator efficiencies.Hilgardia 48: 1–11.Google Scholar
  17. WILSON, L.T. & ROOM, P.M. (1982a). The relative efficiency and reliability of three methods for sampling arthropods in Australian cotton fields.Prot. Ecol. (in press).Google Scholar
  18. WILSON, L.T. & ROOM, P.M. (1982b). Clumping patterns of fruit and arthropods in cotton with implications for binomial sampling.Environ. Entomol. (in press).Google Scholar
  19. WILSON, L.T. GUTTIERREZ, A.P. & LEIGH, T.F. (1980). Within-plant distribution of the immatures ofheliothis zea (Boddie) on cotton.Hilgardia 48: 12–23.Google Scholar
  20. WILSON, L.T.,LEIGH, T.F. & MAGGI, V. (1981). Presence-absence sampling for spidermite densities on cotton.Calif. Agric. 35: 10.Google Scholar
  21. WILSON, L.T., GUTIERREZ, A.P. & HOGG, B.D. (1982). Within-plant distribution of cabbage looper,Trichoplusia ni (Hübner) on cotton: Development of a sampling plan for eggs.Environ. Ent. 11: 251–254.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Balthazar Publications 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. T. Wilson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations