Abstract
The transfer of United States high technology to the Soviet Union shows that, contrary to many assumptions, international transfer of technology can heighten national rivalries and increase military tensions. Many advanced technologies have important military applications. The Soviet Union has acquired much such technology from the west and then has used it to strengthen Soviet military capabilities vis-a-vis the west. This approach to international technology transfer supports general Soviet priorities in science and technology, which emphasize military power rather than international commercial competitiveness or domestic social welfare. The United States and its allies have responded by sharing militarily applicable technology among themselves while denying its export to the Soviet bloc. As of September 1988, neither the Soviet policy of glasnost nor progress in the US-USSR arms control negotiations seems to have changed the primarily military bent of Soviet policy on technology transfer.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jolly, J.A. (1986, Spring).Two Sides of Technology Transfer (Editorial). The Journal of Technology Transfer, 10(2), pp. v-vi.
Frame, J.D. (1986, Spring).Political Risk in International Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 10(2), p. 8.
US Congress (1985).Export Administration Amendments Act of 1985, Public Law 99-64, Sections 3 and 11. Washington, DC.
The White House (1985, Sept. 21).National Security Decision Directive 189: National Policy on the Transfer of Scientific, Technical and Engineering Information. Washington, DC. Typescript, two pages.
Office of the Director of Defense Research and Engineering (1976, Feb. 4).An Analysis of Export Control of US Technology—DOD Perspective: A Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Export of US Technology. Washington, DC. p. 25.
Perry, W.J. (1982, October).Strategic Weapons Exploit Electronics. IEEE Spectrum, (10), p. 94.
Becker, A.S. (1987, September).Gorbachev's Program for Economic Modernization and Reform: Some Important Political-Military Implications. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corp., P-7384; pp. 8–11 (I have made some stylistic changes in Becker's literal translation of the Soviet statements and have added emphases.)
US Congress, Senate, Subcommittee on International Finance and Monetary Policy of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs (1983).Hearing on reauthorization of the Export Administration Act (98th Congress, 1st Session). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, p. 186.
Benson, S. (1985). United States Policy on Strategic Trade with the Soviet Bloc. In A.E. Stent (ed.),Economic Relations with the Soviet Union: American and West German Perspectives, Boulder, CO, and London: Westview Press, pp. 99–109, 115–118.
US Department of Defense (1988, April).Soviet Military Power: An Assessment of the Threat, 1988. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, pp. 32–34.
US Central Intelligence Agency (1987, March 19).Gorbachev's Modernization Program: A Status Report (typescript paper presented to the Subcommittee on National Security Economics of the Joint Economic Committe). Washington, DC: US Congress, p. 35.
US Government (1985, September).Soviet Acquisition of Militarily Significant Western Technology: An Update. Washington, DC: pp. 6, 19–24, 31–34.
Thomas, J.R. (1987).US-Soviet Science and Technology Exchanges as an Aspect of East-West Technology Transfer: Review and Lessons of Experience in the 1970s. In C.M. Perry and R.L. Pfaltzgraff, Jr. (eds.),Selling the Rope to Hang Capitalism? The Debate on West-East Trade & Technology Transfer. Washington, DC: Pergamon-Brassey's International Defense Publishers, pp. 110–127.
Benson, S. (1986, July/August).Scientific Freedom and National Security: Overcoming Complacency. Social Science and Modern Society, 23(5), pp. 12–15.
Staff (1985, March).NTIS “Give-Away” of Scientific and Technical Information” (Scientific Freedom and National Security). Bulletin of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Issue 5, p. 1.
Carrington, T. (1987, June 24).The Silent War: Undersea Arms Race is Preoccupying Navies of US, Soviet Union. The Wall Street Journal, p. 1.
US Commission on Integrated Long-Term Strategy (1988, January).Discriminate Deterrence, Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, p. 9.
US Central Intelligence Agency (1987, Sept. 14).Gorbachev's Program: Motives and Prospects. A typescript statement to the Subcommittee on National Security Economics of the Joint Economic Committee. Washington, DC: US Congress, p. 10.
The White House (1988, January).National Security Strategy of the United States. Washington, DC. P. 13.
US Department of State (1988, Jan. 29).Results of the Senior Political Meeting on Strengthening the Coordinating Committee on Multilateral Export Controls (COCOM). Press Release, Washington, DC.
Markham, J.M. (1988, Jan. 29).Revised Curbs on East-Bloc Trade. The New York Times, pp. D1, D3.
Additional information
Sumnner Benson, Ph. D. deputy director for Technology Cooperation and Security in the Office of the Secretary of Defense and is senior assistant to the director of the Defense Technology Security Administration
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benson, S. How national security considerations affect technology transfer. J Technol Transfer 13, 34–41 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371499
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371499