Abstract
Improvement in the ability of universities in the United States to transfer technology to the private sector is seen as a factor in strengthening American competitiveness. To better understand the university's role in this process, a survey of formal university programs in technology transfer was performed through personal interviews at four midwestern land-grant universities. There are six basic types of programs in place: technical assistance, affiliate, licensing, business development, incubators and research parks, and information networks. For purposes of classifying these programs, we used the model developed by Janis et al. (1) It was found that, of the six modes of technology transfer, two could be considered active, three semi-active and one passive.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Janis, F.T., C.J. Andrews and J.E. Mock (June 1987).Guidebook for T 2 Managers. US Dept. of Energy, ICFAR, Meridian Corp.
Public Policy Center (April 1986).The Higher Education-Economic Development Connection. SRI International, p. 23.
Rogers, Everett M. (June 1986).The Role of the Research University in the Spin-Off of High Technology Companies. Technovation, pp. 169–181.
Evans, Thomas P. (February 1976).Triggering Technology Transfer. Management Review, pp. 26–33.
Doctors, Samuel I. (1969).The Role of Federal Agencies in Technology Transfer. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, p. 3.
Jolly, J.A. and J.W. Creighton (1977).The Technology Transfer Process: Concepts, Framework, and Methodology. Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol. 1–2, pp. 77–91.
Schon, Donald A. (1971).Beyond the Stable State. Norton: New York, pp. 80–84.
Martin, Michael J.C. (1984).Managing Technological Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Reston: Reston VA.
Rogers, Everett M. (1962 and 1983).Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press: New York.
Brodribb, Lisa (October 1986).How to Transfer Technology Successfully, Nationally and Internationally. Paper presented to the International Small Business Congress Seminar Session.
Swanson, David H. (November 1986).Government Research and Small Business. Paper presented to the Agricultural Machinery Conference.
Bright, James R. (September 1969).Some Management Lessons from Technological Innovation Research. Long Range Planning, pp. 26–41.
Ibid., Martin.
Schmidt-Tiedemann, K.J. (March 1982).A New Model of the Innovation Process. Research Management, pp. 18–21.
Tornatzki, L.G., J.D. Eveland, M.G. Boyland, W.A. Hetzner, E.C. Johnson, D. Rortman, J. Schnieder (May 1983).The Process of Technological Innovation: Reviewing the Literature. Washington DC: National Science Foundation.
Science Indicators: The 1985 Report, National Science Foundation. US Government Printing Office: Washington DC.
Mogee, M.F. (1979).The Relationship of Federal Support of Basic Research in Universities to Industrial Innovation and Productivity. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Weiner, Charles (February/March 1986):Universities, Professors, and Patents: A Continuing Controversy. Technology Review, pp. 33–43.
Rogers, Everett M., J.D. Eveland and A.S. Bean (1976).Extending the Agricultural Extension Model. Stanford Press.
Declerq, Guido V. (October 1979).Technology Transfer from Campus to Industry. International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, pp. 237–252.
Ibid.,Janis, F.T., C.J. Andrews and J.E. Mock (June 1987).Guidebook for T 2 Managers. US Dept. of Energy, ICFAR, Meridian Corp. Janis.
Boyd, H.W. and Ralph Westfall (1972).Marketing Research. Irwin: Homewood IL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schoenecker, T.S., Myers, D.D. & Schmidt, P. Technology transfer at land-grant universities. J Technol Transfer 14, 28–32 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371386
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371386