, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 99–106 | Cite as

The species ofEretmocerusHaldeman, 1850 [Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae] from India

  • M. Hayat


An account of the Indian species of the genusEretmocerusHaldeman is given. Three new species (E. indicus sp. n.,E. mashhoodi sp. n.,E. gunturiensis sp. n.) are described. Three species (E. haldemaniHoward,E. mundusMercet,E. corniHaldeman) are reported for the first time from India. A revised key to the known species of the genus is also given.


Plant Pathology Indian Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Une révision des espèces indiennes du genreEretmocerusHaldeman est donnée. Trois nouvelles espèces (E. indicus, E. mashhoodi, E. gunturiensis) sont décrites, trois autres espèces (E. haldemaniHoward,E. mundusMercet,E. corniHaldeman) sont signalées pour la première fois de l’Inde. Une clé révisée des espèces connues de ce genre est proposée.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Compere, H. — 1936. Notes on the classification of theAphelinidae with descriptions of new species. —Univ. Calif. Publs. Ent.,6, 277–322.Google Scholar
  2. De Santis, L. — 1948. Estudio monografico de las Afelinidos de la Republica Argentina. —Rev. Mus. La Plata (N. S.). (Zool),5, 23–280.Google Scholar
  3. Dozier, H. L. — 1932. The identity of certain white fly parasites of the genusEretmocerus Hald., with descriptions of new species. —Proc. ent. Soc. Wash.,34, 112–118.Google Scholar
  4. Ferrière, Ch. — 1965.Hymenoptera Aphelinidae d’Europe et du Bassin méditerranéen. — Faune. Eur. Bass. médit.,Masson & Cie, Paris, 208 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Fletcher, T. B. — 1914. Some South Indian insects and other animals of importance considered especially from an economic point of view. —Madras Government Pubn., 565 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Howard, L. O. — 1895. Revision of theAphelininae of North America. —U. S. Dep. Agric. Bur. Ent. Tech. Ser. No. 1, 44 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Mani, M. S. — 1941. Studies on Indian parasiticHymenoptera. I.. —Indian J. Ent., New Delhi,3, 25–36.Google Scholar
  8. Mercet, R. G. — 1912. Los Afelininos. —Trab. Mus. Cienc. Nat. Madrid., no 10, 1–306.Google Scholar
  9. — — 1931. Notas sobre Afelinidos [Hym. Chalc.], 4a nota. —Eos, Madrid,7, 395–410.Google Scholar
  10. Nikol’skaja, M. N. & Jasnosh, V. A. — 1966.Aphelinidae of the European part of the USSR and Kavkaza. —Opred. Faune. SSSR. No. 91, 296 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Risbec, J. — 1951. I. Les Chalcidoides d’A.O.F. —Mém. Inst. franç. Afr. noire, no. 13, 409 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Samuel, C. K. — 1950. Parasites and parasitism of the white flyBemisia tabaci (Gen), vector of Tobacco leaf-curl in Northern India. —Indian J. Ent., New Delhi,12, 248–250.Google Scholar
  13. Silvestri, F. — 1915. Descrizione di nuovi Imenotteri Chalcididi africani. —Boll. lab. zool. Portici,9, 337–377.Google Scholar
  14. — — 1927. Contribuzione alla conoscenza degliAleyrodidae viventi sur citrus in Estreno Oriente e dei loro parassiti. —Boll. lab. zool. Portici,21, 1–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Le François 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Hayat
    • 1
  1. 1.Entomology Section, Zoology DepartmentAligarh Muslim UniversityAligarhIndia

Personalised recommendations