Skip to main content
Log in

L'élevage en laboratoire, sur un hote de substitution dePhanerotoma flavitestacea [Hym.Braconidae] récolté dans le milieu naturel: conséquences sur le potentiel biotique de l'espèce

  • Mémoires Originaux
  • Published:
Entomophaga Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Résumé

Des individus issus d'une population dePhanerotoma flavitestacea Fisher élevée dequis 1962 sur un hôte de substitutionAnagasta kühniella Zell., ont été réacclimatés avec succés, en 1968, à leur hôte naturelEctomyelois ceratoniae,Zell. dans la région de Nice où ce parasite n'existait pas jusqu'alors. Quatre ans après l'introduction, cette souche «de plein air” ramenée au laboratoire et élevée dans les mêmes conditions que la souche d'origine, présente par rapport à celle-ci un certain nombre de particularités biologiques; le nombre d'ovocytes contenus dans les ovaires des jeunes femelles, le rythme de ponte et la ponte totale sont plus faibles, la maturité sexuelle est plus lente à s'établir. Par contre la durée de la période de ponte, la longévité et le nombre d'anomalies ovariennes ne sont pas modifiées.

Summary

Individuals from a population ofP. flavitestacea, reared from 1962 on the substitute hostAnagasta kuehniella, were successfully re-acclimatised in 1968 on their natural hostEctomylois ceratoniae, in the Nice region, were the parasite was hitherto unknown. Four years after the introduction, this “open air” strain, returned to the laboratory and raised under the same conditions as the original strain, showed certain biological pecularities: the number of ovocytes in the ovaries of the young females, the oviposition rhythm and the total oviposition were all reduced, and sexual maturity was delayed. On the other hand, duration of oviposition, longevity and number of ovarian aberrations were not affected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliographie

  • Bogenschutz, H. — 1971. Comparaison of the reproductive capacity of two pupa parasites. —Z. angew. Ent.,68, 250–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunson, M. H. — 1937. The influence of the instars of host larvae on the sex of the progeny ofTiphia popilliavora Roh. —Science,86, 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, D. E., Jackson, C. G., Latana, R., Neeman, E. G. — 1971. Field cage and laboratory studies withBracon kirkpatrichi (Hym.,Braconidae) a parasite of the pink bollworm [Pectinophora gossypiella: Lep., Gelechiidae]. —J. econ. Ent.,64 (4), 1236–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, C. P. — 1939. The effect of host size upon the sex-ratio of hymenopterous parasites and its relations to methods of rearing and colonisation. —J. New-York ent. Soc.,47, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, P. D. — 1934.Zenillia libatrix Panz., a tachinid parasite of the gypsy moth and the brown tail moth. —J. agric. Res.,48, 97–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, S. E. — 1939. Environmental control of sex in Hymenopterous insects. —Ann. ent. Soc. Am.,32, 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, L. H. — 1950. Host preference inCephalonomya watterstoni Gahan, a Bethylid parasitoid ofLaemopheloemus species. —Behaviour,2, 275–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gothilf, S. — 1969. Natural enemies of the carob mothEctomyeloïs ceratoniae Zeller. —Entomophaga,14, 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leius, K. — 1962. Effect of the body fluids of various host larvae on fecundity of female ofScambus buolianae Htg [Hym., Ichneumonidae]. —Can. Ent.,94, 1078–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Llyod, D. C. — 1958. Studies of parasite oviposition behaviour: IILeptomastix dactylopii Howard [Hym., Encyrtidae]. —Can. ent.,90, 450–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, M. F. — 1970. L'adaptation d'Aphelinus asychis Walker [Hym., Aphelinidae] à certains de ses hôtes naturels [Hom., Aphididae]. —C. R. Acad. Sc. Paris,271, 2339–2341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayanan, E. S. &Rao S. B. — 1955. Studies on insect parasitism I. III.Beitr. ent.,51, 36–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proper A. B. — 1931.Eupteromalus nidulans, a parasite of the brown tail moth and satin moth. —J. agric. Res.,43, 37–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubaud, E. — 1924. Histoire desAnacomtomyres, mouches parasites des guêpes sociales d'Afrique. —Ann. Sc. nat. Zool.,7, 197–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, G. — 1935. Experimental studies in insect parasitism. III, Host selection. —Proc. R. Soc. Lond.,117, 413–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, F. J. — 1944. The propagation of insects parasites on unnatural hosts. —Bull. ent. Res.,35, 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. J. C. &Pimentee, D. — 1956. The effect of two host species on longevity and fertility ofNasonia vitripennis. —Ann. Soc. ent. Am.,62, 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. H. C. — 1937. The biological control of insects in Fiji. —The Imperial Inst. Ent., London, 239 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, W. H. & Jones F. G. W. — 1937. Olfactory conditioning in a parasitic insect and its relations to the problem of host selection. —Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B., 124.

  • Ullyett, G. C. — 1936. Host selection byMicroplectron fuscipennis Zett. [Chalcididae]. —Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B., 120.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferran, A., Laforge, J.P. L'élevage en laboratoire, sur un hote de substitution dePhanerotoma flavitestacea [Hym.Braconidae] récolté dans le milieu naturel: conséquences sur le potentiel biotique de l'espèce. Entomophaga 18, 397–403 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371016

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371016

Navigation