Plant and Soil

, Volume 102, Issue 2, pp 291–294 | Cite as

Theoretical considerations in the comparison of total nitrogen difference and13N isotope dilution estimates of the contribution of nitrogen fixation to plant nutrition

  • Segundo S. Urquiaga
  • Robert M. Boddey
Short Communications

Abstract

In the estimation of the contribution of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) to plant nutrition many authors have compared the estimates derived from the15N-isotope-dilution technique with those derived from the total N-difference technique. In this paper we show that agreement of these two estimates is mathematically inevitable when the recovery of labelled nitrogen (%FUE) by the “N2-fixing” (test) and control plants is equal, and that this agreement does not constitute an independent confirmation of the BNF estimate derived from one technique by the other. Even if different quantities of15N labelled fertilizer are added to the test and control crops (the A-value technique), but the % FUE for the two crops is the same, then again the BNF estimate derived from the A-value calculations will inevitably agree with the total N difference estimate.

Key words

A-value isotope dilution nitrogen fixation quantification 15

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boddey R M and Victoria R L 1986 Plant and Soil 90, 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boddey R Met al. 1984 Soil Biol. Biochem. 16, 583–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bole J B and Rennie R J 1983 Agron. J. 75, 717.Google Scholar
  4. Broadbent F Eet al. 1982 Agron. J. 74, 625–628Google Scholar
  5. Broadbent F Eet al. 1983 Agron. J. 75, 718.Google Scholar
  6. Chalk P M 1985 Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 389–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duque F Fet al. 1985 Plant and Soil 88, 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fried M and Broeshart H 1975 Plant and Soil 43, 707–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fried M and Broeshart H 1983 Agron. J. 75, 718.Google Scholar
  10. Fried M and Middleboe V 1977 Plant and Soil 47, 713–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fried Met al. 1983 Can. J. Microbiol. 29, 1053–1062.Google Scholar
  12. Kohl D H and Shearer G 1981 Plant and Soil 60, 487–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ledgard S Fet al. 1985a Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 317–321.Google Scholar
  14. Ledgard S Fet al. 1985b Soil Biol. Biochem. 17, 323–328.Google Scholar
  15. Ledgard S Fet al. 1985c Aust. J. Agr. Res. 36, 247–258.Google Scholar
  16. Ledgard S Fet al. 1985d Aust. J. Agr. Res. 36, 663–676.Google Scholar
  17. McAuliffe Cet al. 1958 Agron. J. 50, 334–337.Google Scholar
  18. Miranda C H B and Boddey R M 1987 Agron. J. 79, 558–563.Google Scholar
  19. Norman A G 1943 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 10, 191–196.Google Scholar
  20. Patterson T G and Larue T A 1983 Crop Sci. 23, 488–492.Google Scholar
  21. Rennie R J 1982 Can. J. Bot. 60, 856–861.Google Scholar
  22. Rennie R J 1984 Agron. J. 76, 785–790.Google Scholar
  23. Rennie R J 1986 Agron. J. 78, 158–163.Google Scholar
  24. Rennie R Jet al. 1978In Isotopes in Biological Dinitrogen Fixation, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 107–133.Google Scholar
  25. Talbott Het al. 1982 Agron. J. 74, 799–804.Google Scholar
  26. Wagner G H and Zapata F 1982 Agron. J. 74, 607–612.Google Scholar
  27. Witty J F 1983 Soil Biol. Biochem. 15, 631–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Witty J F and Ritz K 1984 Soil Biol. Biochem. 16, 657–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Segundo S. Urquiaga
    • 1
  • Robert M. Boddey
    • 1
  1. 1.EMBRAPA-Programa Nacional de Pesquisa em Biología do SoloRio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations