The choice of pulse duration for chronic electrical stimulation via surface, nerve, and intramuscular electrodes
- 292 Downloads
The peak current, peak voltage, charge transfer and energy dissipation necessary for equivalent stimulation were measured for several pulse durations in the range from 0.01 to 1.0 msec. The unidirectional, regulated current, rectangular waveform was studied for subcutaneous nerve and intramuscular stimulation in animals and for surface stimulation in humans. In addition, the unidirectional, regulated current, exponential waveform was studied in humans and was compared with the rectangular waveform. The question of the relationship between charge transfer and energy dissipation and possible tissue damage due to the electrochemical formation of toxic compounds or a temperature rise in the surrounding tissue was examined. The optimal pulse duration for reducing the possibility of tissue damage was concluded to be less than or equal to 0.01 msec for intramuscular stimulation in the test situation. No conclusion was made as to the optimal duration for nerve or surface stimulation. Excitation of muscle fibers was found to take place indirectly by was of muscle nerves during intramuscular stimulation. The exponential waveform required less charge transfer and energy dissipation than the rectangular waveform, but higher peak currents.
KeywordsCharge Transfer Electrical Stimulation Pulse Duration Tissue Damage Energy Dissipation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Brummer, S. B. Non-Toxic Stimulating Electrodes for Cortical Implantation. Technical Memo Number 71-30. Waltham, Mass.: Tyco Laboratories, 1971.Google Scholar
- Brummer, S. B., andTurner, M. Electrochemical aspects of neuromuscular stimulation. InFunctional Neuromuscular Stimulation: Report of a Workshop. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1972.Google Scholar
- Caldwell, C. W. A High-Strength Platinum Percutaneous Electrode for Chronic Use. Engineering Design Center Report Number EDC-4-70-27. Cleveland, Ohio: Case Western Reserve University, 1970.Google Scholar
- Crago, P. E. Evalvation of Therapy Programs and Function Following Stroke in Man. Engineering Design Center Report Number EDC-4-70-27. Cleveland, Ohio: Case Western Reserve University, 1970.Google Scholar
- Crago, P. E., Peckham, P. H., Van Der Meulen, J. P., and Mortimer, J. T. Minimization of charge transfer and energy dissipation during electrical stimulation of muscle and nerve. Presented atThe Third Annual Conference of the Biomedical Engineering Society, Baltimore, Maryland, 1972.Google Scholar
- Peckham, P. H. Electrical Excitation of Skeletal Muscle: Alteration of Force, Fatigue and Metabolic Properties. Engineering Design Center ReportNumber 4-72-32. Cleveland, Ohio: Case Western Reserve University, 1972.Google Scholar
- Rashevsky, N. Mathematical Biophysics. Physico-Mathematical Foundations of Biology. Volume 1. New York: Dover Publications, 1960.Google Scholar
- Schenck, H. Heat Transfer Engineering. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1961.Google Scholar
- Vodovnik, L., Long, C., Regenos, E., andLippay, A. Pain response to different tetanizing currents.Archives of Physical Medicine 1965,46, 187–192.Google Scholar