Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 573–588 | Cite as

Relations between hydrodynamic and mechanical properties of a sphere

  • David M. Regen
Article

Abstract

Important hydrodynamic characteristics of a heart chamber are isometric pressures at operating distensions, compliances at operating distensions, and wall-displacement resistances at operating distensions. Wall-displacement resistance is the pressure change relative to the rate of cavity-volume change causing the pressure change. Another chamber characteristic is the dependence of wall-displacement resistance on distension. Equations were derived showing dependences of hydrodynamic characteristics on dimensions and mechanical properties of a thick-walled sphere whose inner and outer fibers are comparably stretched at operating distensions. Equations could be arranged so as to identify midwall elements whose enclosed volumes best express distension. If the appropriate midwall volume is used to express distension, then the fractional change of any intensive variable (pressure, apparent average stress, apparent midwall stress, wall-displacement resistance, volume-normalized wall-displacement resistance, apparent average viscosity, apparent midwall viscosity) depends simply on a property of the wall elements and fractional distension change or fractional rate of distension change. The apparent average stress or viscosity calculated with the assumption that the quantity is uniformly distributed is virtually the value of the quantity in the midwall element. These principles should be useful in characterizing normal and abnormal myocardiumin situ.

Keywords

Chamber dynamics myocardial properties heart mechanics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Fung, Y.C. Biodynamics, circulation, New York: Springer Verlag; 1984.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hunter, W.C.; Janicki, J.S.; Weber, K.T.; Noordergraaf, A. Systolic mechanical properties of the left ventricle; effects of volume and contractile state. Circ. Res. 52:319–327; 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Maurer, C.R.; Regen, D.M. Dependence of heart chamber dimensions and dynamics on chamber demands and myocardial properties. J. Theor. Biol. 120:1–29; 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Regen, D.M. Myocardial stress equations: fiberstresses of the prolate spheroid. J. Theor. Biol. 109:191–215; 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Regen, D.M. Independent determinants of systolic effectiveness: growth ability, contractility and mobility. J. Theor. Biol. 132:61–81; 1988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Regen, D.M.; Maurer, C.R. The dependence of chamber dynamics on chamber dimensions. J. Theor. Biol. 105:679–705; 1983.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Regen, D.M.; Maurer, C.R. Evaluation of myocardial properties from image/presure data: chronic conditions. J. Theor. Biol. 120:31–61; 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shroff, S.G.; Janicki, J.S.; Weber, K.T. Left ventricular systolic dynamics in terms of its chamber mechanical properties. Am. J. Physiol. 245:H110–124; 1983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shroff, S.G.; Janicki, J.S.; Weber, K.T. Evidence and quantitation of left ventricular systolic resistance. Am. J. Physiol. 249:H358–370; 1985.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pergamon Press plc 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Regen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular Physiology and BiophysicsVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashville

Personalised recommendations