Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of the bone-implant interface stiffness on stress profiles surrounding Al2O3 and carbon dental implants

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dental implants have been used and studied for the replacement of missing teeth for many years. Finite element stress analysis (FESA) has previously been used in their evaluation to study the effect of various design parameters on induced stresses. A twodimensional FESA was used to evaluate the effect that the implant-bone interface elastic modulus has on the stress distribution around LTI carbon and aluminum oxide dental implants. The results of this investigation indicate that a soft tissue interface between implants and bone negates the effect of implant elastic modulus and results in stress profiles that were almost identical for the LTI carbon and aluminum oxide implants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson, P.J. and C. Woodhead. Remodeling in the aging mandible.J. Implantol. 8(3):353–372, 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atmaran, G.H. and H. Mohammed. Estimation of physiologic stresses with a natural tooth considering fibrous PDL structure.J. Dent. Res. 60(5):873–877, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buch, J.K., J.G. Crose, and C.O. Bechtol. Biomechanical and biomaterial considerations of natural teeth, tooth replacement, and skeleton fixation.Biomater. Med. Devices Artif. Organs 2(2):171–186, 1974.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter, D.R. and W.C. Hayes. The compressive behavior of bone as a two phase porous structure.J. Bone J. Surg. 59A:954–962, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carter, D.R. and D.M. Spengler. Mechanical properties of cortical bone.Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 135: 192–217, 1978.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook, S.D., J.J. Klawitter and A.M. Weinstein. A three dimensional finite element analysis of a porous rooted Co−Cr−Mo alloy dental implant.J. Dental Res. 61(1):25–29, 1982.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cranin, A.N.,Oral Implantology, Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas: 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farrel, C.D., J.N. Kent, J.J. Klawitter, S.F. Hulbert and J.C. Bokros. Histology of LTI carbon dental implant-tissue interface in primates. Extended Abstracts. Thirteenth Biennial Conference on Carbon, Irvine, California, 1977, p. 159.

  9. Hudig, M.M. The mouth: Medical consideration in the construction and design of oral prostheses.Ann. Dent. 37:45–56, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Klawitter, J.J., S.D. Cook, A.M. Weinstein and S. Das. The effect of elastic modulus and trabecular structure on stress distribution around dental implants. Presented at the 57th annual Session, International Association for Dental Research, New Orleans, LA, 1979.

  11. Lavernia, C.J., S.D. Cook, A.M. Weinstein and J.J. Klawitter. An analysis of stress in a dental implant system.J. Biomech. 14(8):555–560, 1981.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohammed, H. and G. Atmaran. Material design structure interactions in single tooth implants. Transactions of the 4th Annual Meeting Society for Biomaterials, 1978, vol. II, 45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mohammed, H., G.H. Atmaran, and F.J. Schoen. Dental implant design: A critical review.Oral Implantol. 8(3):393–412, 1979.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Privitzer, D., O. Widera and J.A. Tesk. Some factors affecting dental implant design. Paper presented at 6th Annual Biomaterials Symposium, Clemson University, 1974.

  15. Tesk, J.A. and O. Widera. Stress distribution in bone arising from loading on endosteal dental implants.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symp. 4:251–261, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thresher, R.W. and G.E. Saito. The stress analysis of human teeth.J. Biomech. 6:443–449, 1973.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weinstein, A.M., J.J. Klawitter, S. Anand, and R. Schuessler. Stress analysis of porous dental implants.J. Dental Res. 55(5):772–777, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weinstein, A.M., J.J. Klawitter and S.D. Cook. Implant-bone interface characteristics of bioglass implants.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 14:23–29, 1980.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Widera, G.E.O., J.a. Tesk and E. Privitzer. Interaction effects among cortical bone, cancellous bone and peridontal membrane of natural teeth and implants.J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Symp. 10(7):613–623, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zucker, E.F. and B. Koplick. An analysis of mandibular stress and its significance in the design of oral endosseous implants. 1977 Biomechanics Symposium: V 89, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, June 1977.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported by NIH Grants DE 04653, DE 0041, and AM 0022, and VA Grant V629P-713.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lavernia, C.J., Cook, S.D., Weinstein, A.M. et al. The influence of the bone-implant interface stiffness on stress profiles surrounding Al2O3 and carbon dental implants. Ann Biomed Eng 10, 129–138 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367461

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367461

Keywords

Navigation