Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of training on human tracking of electrocutaneous signals

  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of training on a person's ability to perceive, interpret and utilize information presented via the tactile sense were examined by using a dual-channel electrocutaneous tracking approach. The electrocutaneous code studied was linear pulse rate encoding of information. The stimulus had a pulse width of 200 μs and a pulse rate between 2 and 50 pulsed per second. Three tracking tasks-visual tracking, onedimensional electrocutaneous tracking and two-dimensional electrocutaneous tracking-were performed by 20 subjects during eight to nine daily training sessions. The effects of this training regimen were found to be highly significant for both electrocutaneous tracking tasks (p<0.00005). The overall average improvement between successive training sessions was 21.6% for one-dimensional electrocutaneous tracking and 22.9% for two-dimensional electrocutaneous tracking. Furthermore, the rate of improvement was fastest during the initial training sessions with a slower rate of improvement seen in most subjects beginning with their fifth session. The cumulative effects of training were also reflected in the lesser amounts of practice and review required by the subjects with each succeeding test session. Results from this study can be used to estimate the amount and rate of improvement that one can expect using a typical training program for tactile sensory aids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bach-y-Rita, P. Sensory substitution in rehabilitation. In:Rehabilitation of the Neurological Patient, edited by L. Illis, M. Sedgwick, and H. Granville. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982, pp. 361–383.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clippinger, F. W., R. Avery and B. R. Titus. A sensory feedback system for an upper-limb amputation prosthesis.Bull. Prosth. Res. BPR-10(22):247–258, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Collins, C.C. Tactile television: Mechanical and electrical image projection.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-11(1):85–91, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Collins, C.C. and J. Madey. Tactile sensory replacement.Proc. San Diego Biomed. Symp. 13:15–26, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dixon, W.J. and F.J. Massey, Jr.Introduction to Statistical Analysis-Fourth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kato, I., S. Yamakawa, K. Ichikawa and M. Sano. Multifunctional myoelectric hand prosthesis with pressure sensory feedback system.Proc. 3rd Int'l. Symp. Ext.Control, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, Aug. 1970.

  7. Keppel, G.Sesign and analysis—A Researcher's Handbook. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Melen, R.D. and J.D. Meindl. Electrocutaneous stimulation in a reading aid for the blind.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-18(1):1–3, 1971.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prior, R.E., P.A. Case and J. Lyman. Hook opening feedback for the below elbow amputee.Proc. San Diego Biomed. Symp. 16:357–368, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saunders, F.A. An electrotactile sound detector for the deaf.IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. AU-21(3):285–287, 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Scott, R.N., R.H. Brittain, R.R. Caldwell, A.B. Cameron and V.A. Dunfield. Sensory feedback system compatible with myoelectric control.Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 18:65–69, 1980.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shannon, G.F. A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback.Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 17:73–80, 1979.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Solomonow, M., J.S. Herskovitz, and J. Lyman. Learning in the tactile sense.Ann. Biomed. Eng. 7:127–134, 1979.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Szeto, A.Y.J. Electrocutaneous code pairs for artificial sensory communication systems.Ann. Biomed. Eng. 10:175–192, 1982.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Szeto, A.Y.J. and J. Lyman. Comparison of codes for sensory feedback using electrocutaneous tracking.Ann. Biomed. Eng. 5:367–383, 1977.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Szeto, A.Y.J., J. Lyman and R.E. Prior. Electrocutaneous pulse rate and pulse width psychometric functions for sensory communications.Human Factors 21(2):241–249, 1979.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Szeto, A.Y.J., R.E. Prior and J. Lyman. Electrocutaneous tracking: A methodology for evaluating sensory feedback codes.IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-26(1):47–49, 1979.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Szeto, A.Y.J. and F.A. Saunders. Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communications in rehabilitation engineering.IEEE Trans Biomed. Eng. BME-29(4):300–308, 1982.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Szeto, A.Y.J., Chung, YM. Effects of training on human tracking of electrocutaneous signals. Ann Biomed Eng 14, 369–381 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367409

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02367409

Keywords

Navigation