Advertisement

Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 335–346 | Cite as

Abundance and distribution of harbour porpoisesPhocoena phocoena in selected areas of the western Baltic and the North sea

  • M. P. Heide-Jørgensen
  • J. Teilmann
  • H. Benke
  • J. Wulf
Article

Abstract

An aerial survey of harbour porpoises,Phocoena phocoena, was conducted in June–July 1992 in the western Baltic (Bay of Kiel, the Great Belt, Little Belt, an area north of Fyn) and a coastal area in the North Sea off the island of Sylt. Survey procedures and statistical analysis were identical to those of a similar survey in 1991 and survey results from the two years were compared. The highest density of porpoises was found in the North Sea area, whereas the Bay of Kiel and the Little Belt had low densities. The Great Belt and the area north of Fyn had intermediate densities and the area north of Fyn had a density similar to that found in the same area in 1991. The distribution of the perpendicular sighting distance from the surveys in 1991 and 1992 was identical in locality and dispersal, but gave rise to different estimates of effective search widths. Pod sizes for the 1992 survey were smaller than pod sizes estimated from boat surveys, but were within the range of those for the 1991 aerial survey.

Keywords

Waste Water Water Pollution Coastal Area Survey Result Aerial Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literature Cited

  1. Andersen, S. H., 1982. Change in the occurrence of the harbour porpoise,Phocoena phocoena, in Danish waters as illustrated by catch statistics from 1834 to 1970.—F. A. O. Fish. Ser.5 (4), 131–133.Google Scholar
  2. Barlow, J., Oliver, C. W., Jackson, T. D. & Taylor, B. L., 1988. Harbor porpoise,Phocoena phocoena, abundance estimation for California, Oregon, and Washington: II Aerial surveys.—Fish. Bull. U.S.86, 433–444.Google Scholar
  3. Buckland, S. T., 1985. Perpendicular distance models for line transect sampling.—Biometrics41, 177–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Laake, J. L., 1980. Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations.—Wild. Monogr., Chestertown,72, 1–203.Google Scholar
  5. Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., White, G. C., Brownie, C. & Pollock, K. H., 1987. Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture.—Am. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, Maryland, 437 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Heide-Jørgensen, M.-P., Mosbech, A., Teilmann, J., Benke, H. & Schultz, W., 1992. Harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) densities obtained from aerial surveys north of Fyn and in the Bay of Kiel.—Ophelia35, 133–146.Google Scholar
  7. Laake, J. L., Buckland, S. T., Anderson, D. R. & Burnham, K. P., 1991. Distance sampling: Abundance estimation of biological population. Colorado Coop. Fish and Wildlife Res. Unit, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colorado, 53 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biologische Anstalt Helgoland 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. P. Heide-Jørgensen
    • 1
  • J. Teilmann
    • 1
  • H. Benke
    • 2
  • J. Wulf
    • 2
  1. 1.Danbiu ApS.Biological ConsultantsCharlottenlundDenmark
  2. 2.Forschungs- und Technologiezettrum WestküsteUniversity of KielBüsumFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations