Skip to main content
Log in

r-Algorithms and ellipsoids

  • Systems Analysis
  • Published:
Cybernetics and Systems Analysis Aims and scope

Conclusion

Transformation (6) smoothing thef(x) level lines explains the effectiveness ofr(α)-algorithms from visual geometrical considerations. It may be regarded as a satisfactory interpretation of space dilation in the direction of the difference of two successive subgradients. On the other hand, it preserves the gradient flavor of the method, in contrast to the classical ellipsoid method [11, 12], which is a successful interpretation of the subgradient method with space dilation in the direction of the subgradient. A sensible combination of ellipsoids of a special kind [5] with the ellipsoids ell(x0,a, b, c) is quite capable of producing, on the basis of a one-dimensional space dilation operator, effective algorithms that solve a broader class of problems than convex programming problems, e.g., the problem to find saddle points of convex-concave functions, particular cases of the problem of solving variational inequalities, and also special classes of linear and nonlinear complementarity problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Z. Shor and N. G. Zhurbenko, “Minimization method using space dilation in the direction of the difference of two successive gradients”, Kibernetika, No. 3, 51–59 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Z. Shor, Minimization Methods for Nondifferentiable Functions and Their Applications [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. I. Stetsyuk, “On convergence ofr-algorithms,” Kibern. Sist. Anal., No. 6, 173–177 (1995).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Z. Shor and S. I. Stetsenko, Quadratic Extremal Problems and Nondifferentiable Optimization [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kiev (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. I. Stetsyuk, “Convergence proof for space-dilation algorithms,” in: Optimal Decision Theory [in Russian], Inst. Kibern. im. V. M. Glushkova NAN Ukr., Kiev (1995), pp. 4–8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. T. Polyak, An Introduction to Optimization [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. C. Kiewel, “An aggregate subgradient method for nonsmooth convex programming,” Math. Progr., No. 27/3, 320–341 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Lemarechal and R. Mifflin, eds. Nonsmooth Optimization, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. B. Shchepakin, “Orthogonal descent method,” Kibernetika, No. 1, 58–62 (1987).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Lemarechal, “An extension of Davidon methods to nondifferentiable problems,” Math. Progr. Study 3, North-Holland, Amsterdam (1975), pp. 95–109.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. B. Yudin and A. S. Nemirovskii, “Information complexity and effective methods for convex extremal problems,” Ekon. Mat. Met., No. 2, 357–359 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Z. Shor, “Cutting plane method with space dilation for the convex programming problem,” Kibernetika, No. 1, 94–95 (1977).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika i Sistemnyi Analiz, No. 1, pp. 113–134, January–February, 1996.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stetsyuk, P.I. r-Algorithms and ellipsoids. Cybern Syst Anal 32, 93–110 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02366587

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02366587

Keywords

Navigation