Cybernetics and Systems Analysis

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 75–79 | Cite as

Remarks on the Dyer-Saaty controversy

  • M. V. Mikhalevich
Systems Analysis


Operating System Artificial Intelligence System Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders, RWS Publ. 4922, Pittsburgh, PA (1988b).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. T. Forman et al., Expert Choice, A Proprietary Software Package, Decision Support, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA (1984).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Belton and T. Gear, “On shortcomings of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies,” Omega,11, No. 3, 228–230 (1983).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. S. Dyer, “Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Management Science,36, No. 3, 249–258 (1990).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. L. Saaty, “An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper ‘Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process’,” Management Science,36, No. 3, 259–268 (1990).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. S. Dyer, “A clarification on ‘Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process’,” Management Science,36, No. 3, 274–275 (1990).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. L. Saaty and J. M. Alexander, Conflict Resolution: The Analytic Hierarchy Approach, Praeger, New York (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. T. Harker and L. G. Vargas, “The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Management Science,33, No. 11, 1383–1403 (1987).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    I. Krovak, “Ranking alternatives: comparison of different methods based on binary comparison matrices,” Eur. J. Oper. Res.,32, 86–95 (1987).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. Nikaido, Convex Structures and Economic Theory, Academic Press, New York (1968).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Fishburn, Utility Theory of Decision Making, Wiley, New York (1970).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. V. Podinovskii and V. D. Nogin, Pareto-Optimal Solutions of Multicriterion Problems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1982).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. V. Sergienko, V. M. Grinchuk, L. F. Gulyanitskii, and L. B. Koshlai, “Algorithms constructing a mathematical model of preferences from expert judgments,” Kibernetika, No. 2, 16–22 (1991).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. S. Mikhalevich and V. L. Volkovich, Computational Methods for Analysis and Design of Complex Systems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1982).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. L. Saaty, “What is relative measurement? The ratio scale phantom,” Math. Comput. Model.,17, No. 4/5, 1–12 (1993).MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. H. Forman, “Facts and fiction about the analytic hierarchy process,” Math. Comput. Model.,17, No. 4/5, 19–26 (1993).MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. V. Mikhalevich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations