Advertisement

Experimental & Applied Acarology

, Volume 5, Issue 3–4, pp 265–292 | Cite as

Temperature-mediated stability of the interaction between spider mites and predatory mites in orchards

  • David J. Wollkind
  • John B. Collings
  • Jesse A. Logan
Population Dynamics Of Spider Mites And Predatory Mites-Part 2

Abstract

The nonlinear behavior of the Holling-Tanner predatory-prey differential equation system, employed by R.M. May to illustrate the apparent robustness of Kolmogorov’s Theorem when applied to such exploitation systems, is re-examined by means of the numerical bifurcation code AUTO 86 with model parameters chosen appropriately for a temperature-dependent mite interaction on fruit trees. The most significant result of this analysis is that there exists a temperature range wherein multiple stable states can occur, in direct violation of May’s interpretation of this system’s satisfaction of Kolmogorov’s Theorem: namely, that linear stability predictions have global consequences. In particular these stable states consist of a focus (spiral point) and a limit cycle separated from each other in the phase plane by an unstable limit cycle, all of which are associated with the single community equilibrium point of the system. The ecological implications of such metastability, hysteresis, and threshold behavior for the occurrence of outbreaks, the persistence of oscillations, the resiliency of the system, and the biological control of mite populations are discussed.

Keywords

Equilibrium Point Linear Stability Spider Mite Exploitation System Predatory Mite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albrecht, F., Gatzka, H. and Wax, N., 1973. Stable limit cycles in prey-predator populations. Science, 181: 1073–1074.Google Scholar
  2. Arrowsmith, D. K. and Place, C.M., 1982. Ordinary Differential Equations. Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 106–109 and 147–151.Google Scholar
  3. Bazykin, A.D., 1974. Volterra’s System and the Michaelis-Menten Equation. In: V.A. Ratner (Editor), Problems in Mathematical Genetics. Novosibirsk: U.S.S.R. Academy of Science, pp. 103–142.Google Scholar
  4. Beddington, J.R., Free, C.A. and Lawton, J.H., 1976. Concepts of stability and resilience in predator-prey models. J. Anim. Ecol., 45: 791–816.Google Scholar
  5. Berryman, A.A., 1987. The theory and classification of outbreaks. In: P. Barbosa and J.C. Schulz (Editors), Insect Outbreaks. Academic Press, New York, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
  6. Caughley, G., 1976. Plant-herbivore systems. In: R.M. May (Editor), Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 94–113.Google Scholar
  7. Danby, J.M.A., 1985. Computing Applications to Differential Equations. Reston Publishing, Reston, VA, pp. 73–75.Google Scholar
  8. Doedel, E.J., 1984. The computer-aided bifurcation analysis of predator-prey models. J. Math. Biol., 20: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison, G.W., 1986. Multiple stable equilibria in a predator-prey system. Bull. Math. Biol., 41: 137–148.Google Scholar
  10. Hassell, M.P., 1978. The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 237 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Hastings, A. and Wollkind, D.J., 1982. Age-structure in predator-prey systems. I. A general model and a specific example. Theor. Popul. Biol., 21: 44–56.Google Scholar
  12. Holling, C.S., 1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can., 45: 3–60.Google Scholar
  13. Holling, C.S., 1973. resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 4: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huffaker, C.B., Shea, K.P. and Herman, S.G., 1963. Experimental studies on predation (III). Complex dispersion and levels of food in an acarine predator-prey interaction. Hilgardia, 34: 305–330.Google Scholar
  15. Kareiva, P. and Odell, G.M., 1987. Swarms of predators exhibit ‘preytaxis’ if individual predators use area restricted search. Am. Nat., 130: 233–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keller, E.F. and Segel, L.A., 1970. Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J. Theor. Biol., 26: 399–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kolmogorov, A.N., 1936. Sull teoria di volterra della lotta per l’esistenza. Gior. Inst. Ital. Attuari, 7: 74–80.Google Scholar
  18. Leslie, P.H., 1948. Some further notes on the use of matrices in population mathematics. Biometrica, 35: 213–245.Google Scholar
  19. Logan, J.A., 1977. Population model of the association ofTetranychus mcdanieli (Acarina: Tetranychidae) withMetaseiulus occidentalis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in the apple ecosystem. Ph.D. Diss., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
  20. Logan, J.A., 1982. Recent advances and new directions in phytoseiid population models. In: M.A. Hoy (Editor), Recent Advances in Knowledge of the Phytoseiidae, Univ. of Calif., Div. Agric. Sci. Publ. 3284, pp. 49–71.Google Scholar
  21. Logan, J.A. and Hilbert, D.W., 1983. Modeling the effect of temperature on arthropod population systems. In: W.K. Lauenroth, G.V. Skogerboe and M. Flug (Editors), Analysis of Ecological Systems: State of the Art in Ecological Modeling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 113–122.Google Scholar
  22. Logan, J.A., Wollkind, D.J., Hoyt, S.C. and Tanigoshi, L.K., 1976. An analytic model for description of temperature dependent rate phenomena in arthropods. Environ. Entomol., 5: 1130–1140.Google Scholar
  23. Lotka, J.A., 1925. Elements of Physical Biology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 88–94 and 150–151.Google Scholar
  24. Ludwig, D., Jones, D.D. and Holling, C.S., 1978. Qualitative analysis of insect outbreak systems: the spruce budworm and forest. J. Anim. Ecol., 47: 315–332.Google Scholar
  25. May, R.M., 1973a. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 79–94 and 188–193.Google Scholar
  26. May, R.M., 1973b. Stable limit cycles in prey-predator populations: A comment. Science, 181: 1074.Google Scholar
  27. May, R.M., 1977. Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature, 269: 471–477.Google Scholar
  28. May, R.M., 1981. Models for two interacting populations. In: R.M. May (Editor), Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications (2nd edition). Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 78–104.Google Scholar
  29. May, R.M. and Leonard, W.J., 1975. Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 29: 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Okubo, A., 1980. Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Mathematical Models. Springer, New York, pp. 203–217.Google Scholar
  31. Plant, R.E. and Mangel, M., 1987. Modeling and simulation in agricultural pest management. SIAM Rev., 29: 235–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pielou, E.C., 1977. Mathematical Ecology. Wiley, New York, pp. 92–95.Google Scholar
  33. Rescigno, A. and Richardson, I.W., 1967. The struggle for life: I. Two species. Bull. Math. Biophys., 29: 377–388.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rescigno, A. and Richardson, I.W., 1973. The deterministic theory of population dynamics. In: R. Rosen (Editor), Foundations of Mathematical Biology. Academic, New York, pp. 283–360.Google Scholar
  35. Rosenzweig, M.L., 1971. Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science, 171: 385–387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Sabelis, M.W. and Laane, W.E.M., 1986. Regional dynamics of spider-mite populations that become extinct locally because of food source depletion and predation by phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Tetranychidae, Phytoseiidae). In: J.A.J. Metz and O. Diekmann (Editors), Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, 68; Springer, Berlin, pp. 345–375.Google Scholar
  37. Sabelis, M.W. and van der Meer, J., 1986. Local dynamics of the interaction between predatory mites and two-spotted spider mites. In: J.A.J. Metz and O. Diekmann (Editors), Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics, 68; Springer, Berlin, pp. 322–344.Google Scholar
  38. Scudo, F.M., 1971. Vito Volterra and Theoretical Ecology. Theor. Popul. Biol., 2: 1–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Segel, L.A., 1972. Simplification and scaling. SIAM Rev., 14: 547–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Takafuji, A., Tsuda, Y. and Miki, T., 1983. System behavior in predator-prey interaction, with special reference to acarine predator-prey system. Res. Popul. Ecol., Suppl. 3: 75–92.Google Scholar
  41. Tanner, J.T., 1975. The stability and the intrinsic growth rates of prey and predator populations. Ecology, 56: 855–867.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, F., 1979. Convergence to stable age distribution in populations of insects. Am. Nat., 113: 511–530.Google Scholar
  43. Volterra, V., 1926. Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero d’individui in specie animali conviventi. Mem. Acad. Lincei, 2: 31–113.Google Scholar
  44. Wangersky, P.J., 1978. Lotka-Volterra population models. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 7: 189–218.Google Scholar
  45. Wollkind, D.J. and Logan, J.A., 1978. Temperature-dependent predator-prey mite ecosystem on apple tree foliage. J. Math. Biol., 6: 265–283.Google Scholar
  46. Wollkind, D.J. and Segel, L.A., 1970. A nonlinear stability analysis of the freezing of a dilute binary alloy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A268: 351–380.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Science Publishers B.V 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Wollkind
    • 1
  • John B. Collings
    • 1
  • Jesse A. Logan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Pure and Applied MathematicsWashington State UniversityPullmanU.S.A.
  2. 2.Natural Resource Ecology LaboratoryColorado State UniversityFort CollinsU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations