Advertisement

Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 243–250 | Cite as

The seaweed flora of a young semi-enclosed sea: The Baltic. Salinity as a possible agent of flora divergence

  • G. Russell
Article

Abstract

The salinity tolerances of Baltic and Atlantic populations ofFucus vesiculosus andChorda filum have been measured using net photosynthesis as an index of tissue damage. AtlanticFucus proved to have a broader salinity tolerance than AtlanticChorda, a result which is consistent with others published on the tolerances of intertidal and sublittoral marine species. The optimum salinity for all Atlantic plants was 11 or 34‰, but that of all Baltic plants was 6‰. BalticFucus andChorda were different in breadth of tolerance, in spite of the fact that they inhabit the same sublittoral habitat. This difference is interpreted in relation to their respective life-forms,Fucus being perennial andChorda annual.Fucus is therefore present as a macrothallus at all times of year, including the critical low-salinity period of the spring ice-melt.Chorda evades damage by existing as a resistent microthallus at this time. It is concluded that the distinctive character of Baltic marine algae deserves nomenclatural recognition at some level below that of the species. The rank of subspecies would appear the most appropriate of those listed in the Code, but none of those available is able adequately to express the patterns of variation now being reported.

Keywords

Waste Water Photosynthesis Water Pollution Salinity Tolerance Marine Alga 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literature Cited

  1. Biebl, R., 1952. Ecological and non-environmental constitutional resistance of the protoplasm of marine algae. — J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.31, 307–315.Google Scholar
  2. Burtt, B. L., 1970. Infraspecific categories in flowering plants. — Biol. J. Linn. Soc.2, 233–238.Google Scholar
  3. Ehlin, U., 1981. Hydrology of the Baltic Sea. In: The Baltic Sea. Ed. by A. Voipio. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 123–134.Google Scholar
  4. Hällfors, G., Niemi, A., Ackefors, H., Lassig, J. & Leppäkoski, E., 1981. Biological oceanography. In: The Baltic Sea. Ed. by A. Voipio. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 219–274.Google Scholar
  5. Hartog, C. den, 1968. The littoral environment of rocky shores as a border between the sea and the land and between the sea and freshwater. — Blumea16, 375–393.Google Scholar
  6. Heywood, V. H., 1986. Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants — a summing up. In: Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants. Ed. by B. T. Styles. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 419–424.Google Scholar
  7. Hoffmann, C., 1950. Über das Vorkommen endemischer Algen in der Ostsee. — Kieler Meeresforsch.7, 24–34.Google Scholar
  8. Ignatius, H., Axberg, S., Niemistö, L. & Winterhalter, B., 1981. Quaternary geology of the Baltic Sea. In: The Baltic Sea. Ed. by A. Voipio. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 54–103.Google Scholar
  9. Jansson, B.-O., 1980. Natural systems of the Baltic Sea. — Ambio9, 128–136.Google Scholar
  10. Kenchington, E. L. R., 1987. Geographic, morphological and genetic variation inXiphophora gladiata (Fucales) Phaeophyta. Thesis, Univ. of Tasmania, 423 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Lakowitz, K., 1929. Die Algenflora der gesamter Ostsee. Danzig, 474 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Luther, H., Hällfors, G., Lappalainen, A. & Kangas, P., 1975. Littoral benthos of the northern Baltic Sea. I. Introduction. — Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr.60, 289–296.Google Scholar
  13. Norton, T. A. & South, G. R., 1969. Influence of reduced salinity on the distribution of two laminarian algae. — Oikos20, 320–326.Google Scholar
  14. Powell, H. T., 1963. Speciation in the genusFucus L. and related genera. In: Speciation in the sea. Ed. by J. P. Harding & N. Tebble. Systematics Ass., London, 63–77.Google Scholar
  15. Raven, J. A. & Samuelsson, G., 1988. Ecophysiology ofFucus vesiculosus L. at its northern limit in the Gulf of Bothnia. — Bot. mar. (In press.)Google Scholar
  16. Rice, E. A. L., Kenchington, T. J. & Chapman, A. R. O., 1985. Intraspecific geographic-morphological variation patterns inFucus distichus andF. evanescens. — Mar. Biol.88, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rueness, J., 1978. Hybridization in red algae. In: Modern approaches to the taxonomy of red and brown algae. Ed. by D. E. G. Irvine & J. H. Price. Acad. Press, London, 247–262.Google Scholar
  18. Russell, G., 1985a. Recent evolutionary changes in the algae of the Baltic Sea. — Br. phycol. J.20, 87–104.Google Scholar
  19. Russell, G., 1985b. Some anatomical and physiological differences inChorda filum from the coastal waters of Finland and Great Britain. — J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.65, 343–349.Google Scholar
  20. Russell, G., 1987a. Salinity and seaweed vegetation. In: Plant life in aquatic and amphibious habitats. Ed. by R. M. M. Crawford. Blackwell, Oxford, 35–52.Google Scholar
  21. Russell, G., 1987b. Spatial and environmental components of evolutionary change: interactive effects of salinity and temperature onFucus vesiculosus as an example. — Helgoländer Meeresunters.41, 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Segerstråle, S. G., 1957. The Baltic Sea In: Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology. I. Ecology. Ed. by J. W. Hedgpeth. Geol. Soc. of America, New York, 751–800.Google Scholar
  23. Slinn, D. J. & Eastham, J. F., 1984. Routine hydrographic observations in the Irish Sea off Port Erin, Isle of Man during 1972–81 inclusive. — Année biol.38, 42–44.Google Scholar
  24. Stace, C. A., 1980. Plant taxonomy and biosystematics. Arnold, London, 279 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Stace, C. A., 1986. The present and future infraspecific classification of wild plants. In: Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants. Ed. by B. T. Styles. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 9–20.Google Scholar
  26. Strickland, J. D. H. & Parsons, T. R., 1968. A practical handbook of seawater analysis. — Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Can.167, 1–311.Google Scholar
  27. Styles, B. T., 1986. Infraspecific classification of wild and cultivated plants. Ed. by B. T. Styles. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 435 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Voss, E. G. (Ed.), 1983. International code of botanical nomenclature. Junk, The Hague, 472 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biologische Anstalt Helgoland 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Russell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyThe UniversityLiverpoolEngland

Personalised recommendations