Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geodesic mappings of affine-connected and Riemannian spaces

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. A. V. Aminova, “Projective-group properties of some Riemannian spaces,” In:Tr. Geometr. Sem. Vol. 6, All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1974), pp. 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. V. Aminova, “Groups of transformations of Riemannian manifolds,” In:Problemy Geometrii, Vol. 22, Itogi Nauki i Tekhn., All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1990), pp. 97–166.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. V. Aminova and T. P. Toguleva, “Projective and affine motions determined by concircular vector fields,” In:Gravitazia i Teoria Otnositelnosti, Kazan'skii Univ., Kazan' (1976), pp. 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. V. Beklemishev, “Differential geometry of spaces with almost complex structure,” In:Geometriya. Itogi Nauki i Tekhn., All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1965), pp. 165–212.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. V. Vishnevskii, “On a parabolical analogy ofA-spaces,”Izv. Vuzov. Mat.,1, 29–38 (1968).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. V. V. Vishnevski, A. P. Shirokov, and V. V. Shurigin,Spaces over Algebras [In Russian], Kazanskii Univ., Kazan' (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. L. Gavrilchenko and J. Mikeš, “On solutions of a system of differential equations in covariant derivatives,” In:Resp. Sci. Conf. “Differ. and Integr. Equations and their Applications,” Abstracts of Reports. Part I, Odessk. Univ., Odessa (1987), pp. 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Z. Gorbatyi, “On a geodesic mapping from equidistant Riemannian spaces and first-class spaces,”Ukr. Geom. Sb.,12, 45–53 (1982).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. I. V. Gribkov, “A characteristic property of Riemannian and pseudo-Riemannian metric with general geodesics,” In: VIIIAll-Union Conf. on Modern Problems of Differential Geometry, Abstracts of Reports, Odessa (1984).

  10. I. P. Egorov,Motion in Spaces with Affine Connection [In Russian], Kazanskii Univ., Kazan' (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. P. Egorov, “Motion in generalized differentially geometrical spaces,” In:Algebra. Topologiya. Geometriya. Itogi Nauki i Tekhn., All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1967), pp. 375–428.

    Google Scholar 

  12. I. P. Egorov, “Authomorphisms in generalized spaces,” In:Problemy Geometrii, Vol. 10,Itogi Nauki i Tekhn., All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1978), pp. 147–191.

    Google Scholar 

  13. V. F. Kagan,Principles of the Theory of Surfaces. Part 2 [In Russian], OGIZ, Moscow-Leningrad (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. F. Kagan,Subprojective Spaces [in Russian], Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. R. Kaigorodov, “On Riemannian spacesD m n ,” In:Tr. Geometr. Sem., Vol. 5,Itogi Nauki i Tekhn., All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1974), pp. 359–373.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. R. Kaigorodov, “Structure of curvature of space-time,” In:Problemy Geometrii, Vol. 14,Itogi Nauki i Tekhn., All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1983), pp. 177–204.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. V. Karmasina and I. N. Kurbatova, “On some problems of geodesic mappings of almost Hermitian spaces,” Odessk. Ped. Inst. (1990); Deposited at Ukr. NIINTI, Kiev, 12.3.90, No. 458-Uk90 (1990).

  18. V. A. Kiosak, “On global geodesic mappings of special Riemannian spaces,” Odessk. Univ. (1989); Deposited at Ukr. NIINTI, Kiev, 5.1.89, No. 176-Uk89 (1989).

  19. V. A. Kiosak, “On Riemannian spacesL n ,” In: IIIVses. Shk. “Pontrjaginskie Chteniya”, Optim. Upravl., Geometriya i Analiz, Kemerovo (1990).

  20. V. A. Kiosak, “On equidistant Riemannian spaces,” In:Geometry of Generalized Spaces [In Russian], Penza (1992), pp. 60–65.

  21. V. A. Kiosak, I. N. Kurbatova, J. Mikeš, and N. V. Yablonskaya, “Geodesic mappings and some of their generalizations,” In:Interregional Scientific Working Conference of Young Scientists Dedicated to the 60th Anniversary of USSR, Abstracts of Reports, Part II (1983), pp. 6–7.

  22. V. A. Kiosak and J. Mikeš, “On the degree of mobility of Riemannian spaces with respect to geodesic mappings,” In:Geometriya Pogruzh. Mnogoobraz., Moscow (1986), pp. 35–39.

  23. V. A. Kiosak and J. Mikeš, “Geodesic mappings and projective transformations of Riemannian spaces,” In:Int. Sci. Proc.: Motion in General Spaces, Ryazansk. Ped. Inst., Ryazan' (1988), pp. 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. I. Kruchkovich, “Riemannian and pseudo-Riemannian spaces,” In:Algebra. Topologiya. Geometriya. Itogi Nauki i Tekhn., All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1968), pp. 191–220.

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. I. Kruchkovich, “On spaces and their geodesic mappings,” In:Trudy Vsesoyuzn. Zaochn. Energ. Inst., Vol. 33, Moscow (1967), pp. 3–18.

  26. Ü. G. Lumiste, “Semisymmetric submanifolds,” In:Problemy Geometrii, Vol. 23, Itogi Nauki i Tekhn., All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1991), pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Mikeš, “Geodesic mappings of semisymmetric Riemannian spaces,” Odessk. Univ. (1976); Deposited at VINITI, 11.11.76, No. 3924-76 (1976).

  28. J. Mikeš, “On some classes of Riemannian spaces locked respectively to geodesic mappings,” In: VIIAll-Union Conf. Modern Diff. Geom., Minsk (1979).

  29. J. Mikeš, “On geodesic mappings of Ricci-2-symmetric Riemannian spaces,”Mat. Zametki,28, No. 2, 313–317 (1980).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. J. Mikeš, “On geodesic mappings of Einsteinian spaces,”Mat. Zametki,28, No. 6, 935–939 (1980).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Mikeš, “Projectively symmetric and projectively recurrent spaces of an affine connection,” In:Tr. Geometr. Sem., Vol. 13, Kazan' (1981), pp. 61–62.

  32. J. Mikeš, “On equidistant Kahlerian spaces,”Mat. Zametki,38, No. 4, 625–633 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Mikeš, “On Sasakian and equidistant Kählerian spaces,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,291, No. 1, 33–36 (1986).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. J. Mikeš, “On concircular global vector fields on compact Riemannian spaces,” Odessk. Univ. (1988); Deposited at Ukr. NIINTI, Kiev, 02.03.88, No. 615-Uk88 (1988).

  35. J. Mikeš, “On evaluations of groups orders of projective transformations of Riemannian spaces,”Mat. Zametki,43, No. 2, 256–262 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. Mikeš, “On the existence of n-dimensional compact Riemannian spaces, which admit global nontrivial projective transformations,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,305, No. 3, 534–536 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. Mikeš, “On geodesic and quasigeodesic global mappings of Riemannian spaces with boundary,” In:All-Union Colloquium of Young Scientists Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of Birth of N. V. Efimov, Abstracts of Reports, Abrau Dyurso, Rostov-on-Don (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. Mikeš, “On geodesic and holomorphically projective mappings of generallym-recurrent Riemannian spaces,”Sib. Mat. Zh. Novosibirsk (1991); Deposited at VINITI, 12.03.91, No. 1059-B91 (1991).

  39. J. Mikeš, “On geodesic mappings of special Riemannian spaces,” In:Resp. Scientific Working Conference Dedicated to the 200th Anniversary of Birth of N. I. Lobachevski, Abstracts of Reports, Part I, Odessa (1992), p. 80.

  40. J. Mikeš, “On geodesic and holomorphically projective mappings of compact semisymmetric and Riccisemisymmetric spaces,” In:International Scientific Conference, Abstracts of Reports, Part. I, Kazan' (1992), pp. 63–64.

  41. J. Mikeš and V. A. Kiosak, “On geodesic mappings of four-dimensional Einsteinian spaces,” Odessk. Univ. (1982); Deposited at VINITI, 9.04.82, No. 1678-82 (1982).

  42. J. Mikeš and V. A. Kiosak, “On geodesic mappings of special Riemannian spaces,” Odessk. Univ. (1985), Deposited at Ukr. NIINTI, Kiev, 5.5.85, No. 904-85 (1985).

  43. J. Mikeš, V. A. Kiosak, and A. Ya. Sultanov, “On special projective vectors,” In:International Scientific Working Conference of Young Scientists, Abstracts of Reports, Part III, Odessa (1987).

  44. J. Mikeš and Dj. Moldobayev, “On some algebraic properties of tensors,” In:Issled. po Neevklid. Geom., Kirghyz. Univ., Frunze (1982), pp. 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. Mikeš and Dj. Moldobayev, “On the distribution of groups orders of conformal transformations of Riemannian spaces,”Izv. Vuzov. Mat.,12, 24–29 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. Mikeš, Dj. Moldobayev, and A. Sabykanov, “On recurrent equiaffine projectively Euclidean spaces,” In:Issled. po Topol. i Geometrii, Kirghyz. Univ., Bishkek (1991), pp. 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. Mikeš and S. M. Pokas, “Lie-groups of second order transformations in associated Riemannian spaces,” Odessk. Univ. (1981); Deposited at VINITI, 30.10.81, No. 4988-81 (1981).

  48. J. Mikeš and V. S. Sobchuk, “On geodesic mappings of three-dimensional Riemannian spaces,”Ukr. Geom. Sb.,34, 80–83 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. Mikeš and G. A. Starko, “On hyperbolically Sasakian and equidistant hyperbolically Kählerian spaces,”Ukr. Geom. Sb.,32, 92–98 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  50. J. Mikeš and O. S. Tolobayev, “Symmetric and projectively symmetric spaces of an affine connection,” In:Issled. po Topol. i Obobshch. Prostranstvam, Kirghyz. Univ., Frunze (1988), pp. 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  51. V. A. Mirzoyan, “Ric-semisymmetric submanifolds,” In:Problemy Geometrii, Vol. 23, Itogi Nauki i Tekhn., All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1991), pp. 29–66.

    Google Scholar 

  52. A. P. Norden,Spaces of an Affine Connection [In Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. Z. Petrov,New Methods in Theory of General Relativity [In Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  54. V. A. Piliposyan, “On geodesic mappings of tangential stratifications of Riemannian manifolds with complete lift metrics,” In:Tr. Geometr. Sem., Vol. 18, Kazan' (1988), pp. 69–89.

  55. A. V. Pogorelov, “On some theorem of Beltrami,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,316, No. 2, 297–299 (1991).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. S. M. Pokas and N. V. Yablonskaya, “On special almost geodesic mappings of affine-connected and Riemannian spaces,”Abstr. Colloq. Different. Geom. Eger (Hunary), 45–50 (1987–1988).

  57. J. Radulovič and J. Mikeš, “On geodesic and F-planar mappings of conformally Kählerian spaces,” In:Internat. Sci. Conf. “Lobachevski and Modern Geometry,” Abstracts of Reports, Part. I, Kazan' (1992).

  58. P. K. Rashevskii, “Scalar field in stratified space,” In:Tr. Sem. po Vekt. i Tenz. Anal., Vol. 6 (1948).

  59. D. I. Rosenfeld, “Geodesic correspondence of conformally flat Riemannian spaces,”Ukr. Geom. Sb.,5–6, No. 6, 139–146 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  60. D. I. Rosenfeld and E. Z. Gorbaty, “On geodesic mappings of Riemannian spaces onto conformally flat Riemannian spaces,”Ukr. Geom. Sb.,12, 115–124 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  61. A. Sabykanov, J. Mikeš, and Dj. Moldobayev, “Recurrent equiaffine projectively Euclidean spaces,” In:Reps. Scientific Working Conference Dedicated to 200th Anniversary of Birth of N. I. Lobachevski, Abstracts of Reports, Part I, Odessa (1992), p. 80.

  62. N. S. Sinyukov,Geodesic Mappings of Riemannian Spaces [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  63. N. S. Sinyukov, “Lie-groups of projective transformations of equidistant spaces,” In:Ninth All-Union Conference on Geometry, Abstracts of Reports, Kishinev (1988), pp. 285–286.

  64. N. S. Sinyukov, I. N. Kurbatova, and J. Mikeš,Holomorphically Projective Mappings on Kählerian Spaces [In Russian], Odess. Univ., Odessa (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  65. N. S. Sinyukov and J. Mikeš, “On geodesic and holomorphically projective mappings of some Riemannian spaces,” In:Fifth Pribalt. Geom. Conf., Abstract of Reports, Druskininkay (1978).

  66. N. S. Sinyukov and S. M. Pokas, “Second-order motion groups in associative Riemannian spaces,” In:Dvizheniya v Obobshchennykh Prostranstvakh, Ryazansk. Ped. Inst., Ryazan' (1985), pp. 30–36.

    Google Scholar 

  67. N. S. Sinyukov and E. N. Sinyukova, “On global geodesic mappings of generally twice recurrent Riemannian spaces,” In:Seventh Pribalt. Conf. on Modern Differential Geometry, Tallinn (1984), pp. 106–107.

  68. E. N. Sinyukova, “On geodesic mappings of some special Riemannian spaces,”Mat. Zametki,30, No. 6, 889–894 (1981).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  69. E. N. Sinyukova, “On global geodesic mappings of some special Riemannian spaces,” [In Russian], Odessk. Univ., Odessa (1982); Deposited at VINITI, 20.07.82, No. 3892-82 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  70. E. N. Sinyukova, “Geodesic mappings of spacesL n,”Izv. Vuzov. Mat.,3, No. 82, 57–61 (1982).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. E. N. Sinyukova, “On global geodesic mappings of Riemannian spaces, satisfying some inequality-type conditions,” In:Interregional Scientific Working Conference of Young Scientists Dedicated to the 60th Anniversary of USSR, Abstracts of Reports, Part II Abstracts of Reports, Part II, Odessa (1983), pp. 16–18.

  72. E. N. Sinyukova, “Some problems of the theory of global geodesic mappings of Riemannian spaces,” In:Ninth All-Union Conference on Geometry, Abstracts of Reports, Kishinev (1988), pp. 286–287.

  73. V. S. Sobchuk, “Ricci-generalized-symmetric Riemannian spaces admit nontrivial geodesic mappings,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,267, No. 4, 793–795 (1982).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  74. V. S. Sobchuk, “Investigations on the theory of geodesic mappings and their generalizations,” In:Differents.-Geometr. Struct. na Mnogoobr., Chernovits. Univ., Chernovtzy (1991); Deposited at VINITI, 05.02.91, No. 562-91B (1991). pp. 196–208.

    Google Scholar 

  75. V. S. Sobchuk, “On geodesic mappings of Ricci 4-symmetric Riemannian spaces,”Izv. Vuzov. Mat., No. 4, 69–70 (1991).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  76. V. S. Sobchuk, “Some properties ofR-K-spaces admitting geodesic mappings,” In:Resp. Sci. Working Conference Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of Birth of N. I. Lobachevski, Abstracts of Reports. Part I, Odessa (1992), pp. 92–93.

  77. V. S. Sobchuk, D. R. Laitarchuk, and O. G. Stangret, “Geodesic mappings of m-symmetric and generallym-recurrent Riemannian spaces” In:All-Union Conference on Geometry in the Large, Abstracts of Reports, Novosibirsk (1988), p. 114.

  78. A. S. Solodovnikov, “Geodesic classes of spacesV(K),”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,3, No. 1, 33–36 (1956).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  79. A. S. Solodovnikov, “Geodesic description of all possible forms of Riemannian metrics in the form of Levi-Civita,” In:Tr. Sem. Vect. Tenz. Anal., Vol. 12 (1963), pp. 131–173.

  80. I. A. Shouten and D. J. Struik,Introduction to New Methods of Differential Geometry, Ch. 1 [In Russian], Gostekhizdat, Moscow-Leningrad (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  81. G. N. Timofeev, “Projectively symmetric spaces of an affine connection,” In:All-Union Scientific Conference on non-Euclidean Geometry, 150th Anniversary of Lobachevski's Geometry, Abstracts of Reports, Kazan' (1976).

  82. E. V. Ferapontov, “Autotransformations by solution and hydrodynamical symmetries,”Differents. Uravn.,27, No. 7, 1250–1263 (1991).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  83. V. E. Fomin, “On geodesic mappings of infinite-dimensional Riemannian spaces onto symmetric spaces of an affine connection,” In:Tr. Geometr. Sem., Vol. 11, Kazan' (1979), pp. 93–99.

  84. V. E. Fomin, “A pair of infinite-dimensional Levi-Civita spaces can have no general geodesic,” In:Tr. Geom. Semin., Vol. 17, Kazan' (1986), pp. 79–83.

  85. I. I. Tsiganok,Torse-Forming Vector Fields and Groups of Affine Homotheties, Webs, and Quasigroups [in Russian], Kalinin (1988).

  86. Kh. Shadyev, “Projective transformations of a synectic connection in tangential stratification,”Izv. Vuzov. Mat.,9, 75–77 (1987).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  87. I. G. Shandra, “On the problem of geodesic mappings of Riemannian spaces,” In:Resp. Scientific Working Conference Dedicated to the 200th Anniversary of Birth of N. I. Lobachevski, Abstracts of Reports. Part I, Odessa (1992), pp. 99–100.

  88. I. G. Shandra, “Spaces and Jordan algebra,” In:Collection of Works in Honor of Lobachevski, Kazan' (1992), pp. 99–104.

  89. Ya. L. Shapiro, “On geodesic fields of many-dimensional directions,”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,32, No. 4, 237–239 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  90. A. P. Shirokov, “Structures on differentiable manifolds,” In:Algebra. Topologiya. Geometriya. Itogi Nauki i Tekhn., All-Union Institute for Scientific and Technical Information (VINITI), Akad. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1969), pp. 127–188.

    Google Scholar 

  91. P. A. Shirokov,Selected Investigations on Geometry [in Russian], Kazan' Univ. Press, Kazan' (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  92. M. Shiha and J. Mikeš, “Parabolically Kählerian and Sasakian spaces,” In:All-Union Colloquium of Young Scientists on Differential Geometry Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of Birth of N. V. Efimov, Abstracts of Reports, Abrau Dyurso, Rostov-on-Don (1990), p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  93. M. Afwat and A. Švec, “Global differential geometry of hypersurfaces,”Rozpr. ČSAV,88, No. 7, 1–75 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  94. H. Akbar-Zadeh and R. Couty, “Espaces a tenseur de Ricci parallele admetant des transformations projectives,”Rend. Mat.,11, No. 1, 85–96 (1978).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  95. E. Beltrami, “Risoluzione del problema: riportari i punti di una superficie sopra un piano in modo che le linee geodetiche vengano rappresentante da linee rette,”Ann. Mat. 1, No. 7 (1865).

  96. E. Beltrami, “Teoria fondamente degli spazii di curvatura constante,”Ann. Mat.,2, No. 2, 232–255 (1868).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  97. S. Bochner, “Curvature in a hermitian metric,”Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.,53, 179–195 (1947).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  98. E. Cartan,Lecons sur la Theorie des Spaces a Connexion Projective, Paris (1931).

  99. N. Coburn, “Unitary spaces with corresponding geodesics,”Bull. Am. Math. Soc.,47, 901–910 (1941).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  100. R. Couty, “Transformations projectives sur un espace d'Einstein complect”C.R., Acad. Sci.,252, No. 8, 1096–1097 (1961).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  101. R. Couty, “Transformations projectives des varietes presque kahleriennes,”C.R., Acad. Sci.,254, No. 24, 4132–4134 (1962).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  102. F. Defever and R. Deszcz, “A note on geodesic mappings of pseudosymmetric Riemannian manifolds,”Colloq. Math.,62, 313–319 (1991).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  103. R. Deszcz and M. Hotlos, “On geodesic mappings in pseudo-symmetric manifolds,”Bull. Inst. Math. Sinica,16, No. 3, 251–262 (1968).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  104. U. Dini, “Sobre un problema che is presenta nella theoria generale delle rappresentazioni geografiche di una superficie su di un'altra,”Ann. Mat.,3 (1869).

  105. L. P. Eisenhart,Riemannian Geometry, Princeton Univ. Press (1926).

  106. A. Fialkow, “Conformal geodesics,”Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,45, 443–473 (1939).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  107. D. Florea, “Spatti Riemann in correspondenta geodesica,”Stud. Cerc. Mat.,40, No. 6, 467–470 (1988).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  108. S. Formella, “On geodesic mappings in some riemannian and pseudo-riemannian manifolds,”Tensor,46, 311–315 (1987).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  109. S. Formella, “Generalized Einstein manifolds,” In:Proc. of the Winter School on Geom. and Phys., (Srni, 1990). Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo, Vol. 22 (1990), pp. 49–58.

  110. G. Fubini, “Sui gruppi transformazioni geodetiche,”Mem. Acc. Torino,2, 261–313 (1903).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  111. M. L. Gavrilčenko, “Geodesic deformations of Riemannian spaces,” In:Diff. Geom. and Its Appl. Int. Conf. Brno, 1989, Singapore (1990), pp. 47–53.

  112. W. Glodek, “A note on riemannian spaces with recurrent projective curvature,”Pr. Nauk. Inst. Mat. Fiz. Teor. Wr. Ser. Stud. Mater.,1, 9–12 (1970).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  113. A. Gray and L. M. Hervella, “The sixteen classes of almost Hermitian manifolds and their linear invariants,”Ann. Mat. Pura Appl.,123, No. 4, 35–58 (1980).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  114. E. Kähler, “Über eine bemerkenswerte Hermitische Metrik,”Abh. Math. Semin. Hamburg. Univ.,9, 173–186 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  115. E. Cartan, “Sur une classe remarquable d'espaces de Riemann,”Bull. Soc. Math. France,54, 214–264 (1926);55, 114–134 (1927).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  116. G. H. Katzin and J. Levine, “Applications of Lie derivatives to symmetries, geodesic mappings and first integrals in Riemannian spaces,”Colloq. Math.,26, 21–38 (1972).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  117. V. A. Kiosak, “Geodesic mapping of the special Riemannian spaces,” In:Colloq. on Diff. Geom., Eger (Hungaria) (1989).

  118. S. Kobayashi,Transformation Groups in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  119. S. Kobayashi, and K. Nomizu,Foundation of Differential Geometry, Vol. 1, Interscience. Publ., New York-London (1963); Vol. 2 Interscience. Publ., New York-London-Sydney (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Koga Mitsuru, “On projective diffeomorphismus not necessarily preserving complex structure,”Math. J. Okayama Univ.,19, No. 2, 183–191 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  121. T. Levi-Civita, “Sulle transformationi delle equazioni dinamiche,”Ann. Mat. Milano,24, Ser. 2, 255–300 (1886).

    Google Scholar 

  122. A. Lichnerowicz, “Courbure, nombres de Betti et espaces symmetriques,” In:Proc. Int. Congr. Math. (Cambridge, 1950), Vol. 2, Amer. Math. Soc. (1952), pp. 216–223.

  123. J. Mikeš, “O geodetických transformacích polosymmetrických riemannových variet,” In:Zb. Anotacií, Košice (Czechslov.) (1977).

  124. J. Mikeš, “Geodesic mappings of special Riemannian spaces,” In:Colloq. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai. 46.Top. in Diff. Geom., Debrecen, 1984, Vol. 2, Amsterdam (1988), pp. 793–813.

  125. J. Mikeš, “On the order of a special transformation of Riemannian spaces,” In:Proc. Conf. Diff. Geom. and Appl., Dubrovnik, 1988, Novi Sad (Yugosl.) (1989), pp. 199–208.

  126. J. Mikeš, “On the existence of nontrivial global geodesic mappings ofn-dimensional compact surfaces of revolution,” In:Diff. Geom. and Its Appl., Proc. Conf., Brno (Czechosl.), 1989, World Scientific, Singapore (1990), pp. 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  127. J. Mikeš and V. Berezovski, “Geodesic mappings of affine-connected spaces onto Riemannian spaces,” In:Colloq. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai, 56.Diff. Geom. Eger (Hungary) (1989), pp. 491–494.

  128. R. F. Reynolds and A. H. Thompson, “Projective-symmetric spaces,”J. Austral. Math. Soc.,7, No. 1, 48–54 (1967).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  129. W. Roter, “A note infinitesimal projective transformations in recurrent spaces of second order,”Zesz. Nauk. Politechn. Wroclawsk.,197, 87–94 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  130. C. Simonescu, “Varietati Riemann in corepondenta geodezica definite pe un suport compact,” In:Lucr. Sti. Inst. Politech. Brasov. Fac. Mec., Vol. 5 (1961), pp. 15–19.

  131. H. Takeno and M. Ikeda, “Theory of spherically symmetric space-times. VII. Space-times with corresponding geodesics,”J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ.,A17, No. 1, 75–81 (1953).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  132. T. Y. Thomas, “On projective and equiprojective geometries of paths,”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA,11, 198–203 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  133. P. Venzi, “On geodesic mappings on Riemannian and pseudoriemannian manifolds,”Tensor,32, No. 2, 192–198 (1978).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  134. P. Venzi, “Geodätische abbildungen in Riemanscher mannigfaltigkeiten,”Tensor,33, 313–321 (1979

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  135. P. Venzi, “On concircular mappings in Riemannian and pseudo-Riemannian manifolds with symmetry conditions,”Tensor,33, 109–113 (1979).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  136. P. Venzi, “On geodesic mappings in Riemannian and pseudo-Riemannian manifolds,”Tensor,33, 23–28 (1979).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  137. P. Venzi, “Geodätische Abbildungen mit λ ij =Δg ij ,”Tensor,34, No. 2, 230–234 (1979).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  138. P. Venzi, “Onq-projectively recurrent spaces,”Rend. Circ. Math. Palermo,30, No. 3, 421–434 (1981).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  139. P. Venzi, “Über konforme und geodätische Abbildungengen,”Result. Math.,5, No. 2, 184–198 (1982).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  140. P. Venzi, “The metricds 2=F(u)du 2+G(u)dσ 2 and an application to concircular mappings,”Util. Math.,22, 221–233 (1982).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  141. P. Venzi, “Klassifikation der geodätischen Abbildungen mit\(\overline {Ric} - Ric = \Delta g\),”Tensor,37, 137–147 (1982).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  142. P. Venzi, “The geodesic mappings in Riemannian and pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, Stochastic processes in classical and quantum system,”Lect. Notes, Phys.,262, 512–516 (1986).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  143. G. Vranceanu, “Proprietati globale ale spatiilor bui Riemann cu conexiune abina constanta,”Stud. Cerc. Mat. Acad. RPR,14, No. 1, 7–22 (1963).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  144. H. L. Vries, “Über Riemannsche Raume die infinitesimale konforme Transformationen gestätten,”Math. Z.,60, No. 3, 328–347 (1954).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  145. W. J. Westlake, “Hermitian spaces in geodesic correspondence,”Proc. Am. Math. Soc.,5, No. 2, 301–303 (1954).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  146. H. Weyl,Zur Infinitesimalgeometrie Einordnung der Projectiven und der Konformen Auffassung Göttinger Nachtr. (1921).

  147. K. Yano,Concircular Geometry, I–IV. (Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo) Vol. 16 (1940).

  148. K. Yano,Differential Geometry on Complex and Almost Complex Spaces, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  149. K. Yano, “Sur la correspondence projective entre deux espaces pseudohermitens,”C. R., Acad. Sci.,239, 1346–1348 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  150. K. Yano and S. Bochner,Curvature and Betti Numbers, Princeton, New Jersey (1953).

  151. K. Yano and T. Nagano, “Some theorems on projective and conformal transformations,”Koninkl. Nederl. Akad. Wet.,A60, No. 4, 451–458 (1957).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. J. Mikeš
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Translated from Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki, Seriya Sovremennaya Matematika i Ee Prilozheniya. Tematicheskie Obzory. Vol. 11, Geometry-2, 1994.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mikeš, J. Geodesic mappings of affine-connected and Riemannian spaces. J Math Sci 78, 311–333 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02365193

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02365193

Keywords

Search

Navigation